Literature DB >> 19107818

Comparison of navigation accuracy in THA between the mini-anterior and -posterior approaches.

Takehito Hananouchi1, Masaki Takao, Takashi Nishii, Hidenobu Miki, Daiki Iwana, Hideki Yoshikawa, Nobuhiko Sugano.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The accuracy of a CT-based hip navigation might depend on surgical approaches, resulting in varying accuracy of implant alignment.
METHODS: We performed primary cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) with mini-incision surgery (MIS) to 40 well-matched patients (anterior or posterior approaches, 20 hips each), using navigation with surface registration. We investigated cup alignment using postoperative computed tomography (CT) and compared the navigation accuracy between the two approaches, i.e. the difference between intra-operative and postoperative alignments of the cup.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two approaches. The mean navigation accuracies in abduction and anteversion were 2.0 degrees (SD 1.4 degrees) and 2.7 degrees (SD 1.9 degrees), respectively, in the anterior approach, and 2.4 degrees (SD 2.0 degrees) and 2.0 degrees (SD 1.4 degrees), respectively, in the posterior approach. All cup alignments were within 10 degrees of the target orientation.
CONCLUSIONS: This CT-based navigation for MIS-THA provides navigation accuracy without significant differences between the two approaches and with favourable alignment of the cup.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19107818     DOI: 10.1002/rcs.226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Robot        ISSN: 1478-5951            Impact factor:   2.547


  7 in total

1.  Tailor-made Surgical Guide Reduces Incidence of Outliers of Cup Placement.

Authors:  Takehito Hananouchi; Masanobu Saito; Tsuyoshi Koyama; Nobuhiko Sugano; Hideki Yoshikawa
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Effect of improved navigation performance on the accuracy of implant placement in total hip arthroplasty with a CT-based navigation system.

Authors:  Ichiro Nakahara; Takayuki Kyo; Yasuo Kuroda; Hidenobu Miki
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 1.731

3.  Factors related to disagreement in implant size between preoperative CT-based planning and the actual implants used intraoperatively for total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Takeshi Ogawa; Masaki Takao; Takashi Sakai; Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Image-Less THA Cup Navigation in Clinical Routine Setup: Individual Adjustments, Accuracy, Precision, and Robustness.

Authors:  Corinne A Zurmühle; Benjamin Zickmantel; Matthias Christen; Bernhard Christen; Guoyan Zheng; Joseph M Schwab; Moritz Tannast; Simon D Steppacher
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 2.948

Review 5.  Factors influencing the outcomes of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Filippo Migliorini; Andrea Pintore; Joerg Eschweiler; Francesco Oliva; Frank Hildebrand; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 2.677

Review 6.  Direct anterior total hip arthroplasty: Literature review of variations in surgical technique.

Authors:  Keith P Connolly; Atul F Kamath
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-01-18

7.  Nerve palsy, dislocation and revision rate among the approaches for total hip arthroplasty: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Authors:  F Migliorini; A Trivellas; J Eschweiler; A Driessen; F Lessi; M Tingart; P Aretini
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2020-05-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.