Literature DB >> 29556141

Extended localization and adaptive dose calculation using HU corrected cone beam CT: Phantom study.

K Mohamathu Rafic1, S Amalan1, B S Timothy Peace1, B Paul Ravindran1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The practicability of computing dose calculation on cone beam CT (CBCT) has been widely investigated. In most clinical scenarios, the craniocaudal scanning length of CBCT is found to be inadequate for localization. This study aims to explore extended tomographic localization and adaptive dose calculation strategies using Hounsfield unit (HU) corrected CBCT image sets.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Planning CT (pCT) images of the Rando phantom (T12-to-midthigh) were acquired with pelvic-protocol using Biograph CT-scanner. Similarly, half-fan CBCT were acquired with fixed parameters using Clinac2100C/D linear accelerator integrated with an on-board imager with 2-longitudinal positions of the table. For extended localization and dose calculation, two stitching strategies viz., one with "penumbral-overlap" (S1) and the other with "no-overlap" (S2) and a local HU-correction technique were performed using custom-developed MATLAB scripts. Fluence modulated treatment plans computed on pCT were mapped with stitched CBCT and the dosimetric analyses such as dose-profile comparison, 3D-gamma (γ) evaluation and dose-volume histogram (DVH) comparison were performed.
RESULTS: Localizing scanning length of CBCT was extended by up to 15 cm and 16 cm in S1 and S2 strategies, respectively. Treatment plan mapping resulted in minor variations in the volumes of delineated structures and the beam centre co-ordinates. While the former showed maximum variations of -1.4% and -1.6%, the latter showed maximum of 1.4 mm and 2.7 mm differences in anteroposterior direction in S1 and S2 protocols, respectively. Dosimetric evaluations viz., dose profile and DVH comparisons were found to be in agreement with one another. In addition, γ-evaluation results showed superior pass-rates (≥98.5%) for both 3%/3 mm dose-difference (DD) and distance-to-agreement (DTA) and 2%/2 mm DD/DTA criteria with desirable dosimetric accuracy.
CONCLUSION: Cone beam tomographic stitching and local HU-correction strategies developed to facilitate extended localization and dose calculation enables routine adaptive re-planning while circumventing the need for repeated pCT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adaptive radiotherapy; Cone beam computed tomography; Dose calculation; Hounsfied unit; Registration; Rigid

Year:  2018        PMID: 29556141      PMCID: PMC5856675          DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2018.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother        ISSN: 1507-1367


  16 in total

1.  Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: initial performance characterization.

Authors:  D A Jaffray; J H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  A performance comparison of flat-panel imager-based MV and kV cone-beam CT.

Authors:  B A Groh; J H Siewerdsen; D G Drake; J W Wong; D A Jaffray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Flat-panel cone-beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy.

Authors:  David A Jaffray; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen; John W Wong; Alvaro A Martinez
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 4.  Linac-integrated kV-cone beam CT: technical features and first applications.

Authors:  Uwe Oelfke; Thomas Tücking; Simeon Nill; Annete Seeber; Bernd Hesse; Peter Huber; Christoph Thilmann
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.482

5.  Cone beam computerized tomography: the effect of calibration of the Hounsfield unit number to electron density on dose calculation accuracy for adaptive radiation therapy.

Authors:  Joan Hatton; Boyd McCurdy; Peter B Greer
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Automated algorithm for CBCT-based dose calculations of prostate radiotherapy with bilateral hip prostheses.

Authors:  Turki Almatani; Richard P Hugtenburg; Ryan D Lewis; Susan E Barley; Mark A Edwards
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  A radiographic and tomographic imaging system integrated into a medical linear accelerator for localization of bone and soft-tissue targets.

Authors:  D A Jaffray; D G Drake; M Moreau; A A Martinez; J W Wong
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1999-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  A study on adaptive IMRT treatment planning using kV cone-beam CT.

Authors:  George X Ding; Dennis M Duggan; Charles W Coffey; Matthew Deeley; Dennis E Hallahan; Anthony Cmelak; Arnold Malcolm
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 6.280

9.  Cone beam computed tomography number errors and consequences for radiotherapy planning: an investigation of correction methods.

Authors:  Gavin G Poludniowski; Philip M Evans; Steve Webb
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  A comparison of the quality assurance of four dosimetric tools for intensity modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Jaeman Son; Taesung Baek; Boram Lee; Dongho Shin; Sung Yong Park; Jeonghoon Park; Young Kyung Lim; Se Byeong Lee; Jooyoung Kim; Myonggeun Yoon
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 2.991

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Registration methods in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Paweł Czajkowski; Tomasz Piotrowski
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2018-10-10

2.  A new strategy for craniospinal axis localization and adaptive dosimetric evaluation using cone beam CT.

Authors:  Kather Hussain Mohamathu Rafic; Christopher Sujith; Balakrishnan Rajesh; Ebenezer Suman Babu S; Peace Balasingh Timothy; B Selvamani; Paul B Ravindran
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2019-12-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.