Literature DB >> 19590116

Cone beam computerized tomography: the effect of calibration of the Hounsfield unit number to electron density on dose calculation accuracy for adaptive radiation therapy.

Joan Hatton1, Boyd McCurdy, Peter B Greer.   

Abstract

The availability of cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) images at the time of treatment has opened possibilities for dose calculations representing the delivered dose for adaptive radiation therapy. A significant component in the accuracy of dose calculation is the calibration of the Hounsfield unit (HU) number to electron density (ED). The aim of this work is to assess the impact of HU to ED calibration phantom insert composition and phantom volume on dose calculation accuracy for CBCT. CBCT HU to ED calibration curves for different commercial phantoms were measured and compared. The effect of the scattering volume of the phantom on the HU to ED calibration was examined as a function of phantom length and radial diameter. The resulting calibration curves were used at the treatment planning system to calculate doses for geometrically simple phantoms and a pelvic anatomical phantom to compare against measured doses. Three-dimensional dose distributions for the pelvis phantom were calculated using the HU to ED curves and compared using Chi comparisons. The HU to ED calibration curves for the commercial phantoms diverge at densities greater than that of water, depending on the elemental composition of the phantom insert. The effect of adding scatter material longitudinally, increasing the phantom length from 5 cm to 26 cm, was found to be up to 260 HU numbers for the high-density insert. The change in the HU value, by increasing the diameter of the phantom from 18 to 40 cm, was found to be up to 1200 HU for the high-density insert. The effect of phantom diameter on the HU to ED curve can lead to dose differences for 6 MV and 18 MV x-rays under bone inhomogeneities of up to 20% in extreme cases. These results show significant dosimetric differences when using a calibration phantom with materials which are not tissue equivalent. More importantly, the amount of scattering material used with the HU to ED calibration phantom has a significant effect on the dosimetric accuracy, particularly in the radial direction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19590116     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/15/N01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  44 in total

1.  Hounsfield units variations: impact on CT-density based conversion tables and their effects on dose distribution.

Authors:  B Zurl; R Tiefling; P Winkler; P Kindl; K S Kapp
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Joint CT/CBCT deformable registration and CBCT enhancement for cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Yifei Lou; Tianye Niu; Xun Jia; Patricio A Vela; Lei Zhu; Allen R Tannenbaum
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 8.545

Review 3.  CBCT-based bone quality assessment: are Hounsfield units applicable?

Authors:  R Pauwels; R Jacobs; S R Singer; M Mupparapu
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Intensity modulated proton therapy.

Authors:  H M Kooy; C Grassberger
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Validation of a deformable image registration technique for cone beam CT-based dose verification.

Authors:  M Moteabbed; G C Sharp; Y Wang; A Trofimov; J A Efstathiou; H-M Lu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Can CT scan protocols used for radiotherapy treatment planning be adjusted to optimize image quality and patient dose? A systematic review.

Authors:  Anne T Davis; Antony L Palmer; Andrew Nisbet
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  An evaluation of techniques for dose calculation on cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Valentina Giacometti; Raymond B King; Christina E Agnew; Denise M Irvine; Suneil Jain; Alan R Hounsell; Conor K McGarry
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Deformable registration of CT and cone-beam CT with local intensity matching.

Authors:  Seyoun Park; William Plishker; Harry Quon; John Wong; Raj Shekhar; Junghoon Lee
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Practically acquired and modified cone-beam computed tomography images for accurate dose calculation in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Chih-Chung Hu; Wen-Tao Huang; Chiao-Ling Tsai; Jian-Kuen Wu; Hsiao-Ling Chao; Guo-Ming Huang; Chun-Wei Wang; Chien-Jang Wu; Jason Chia-Hsien Cheng
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 3.621

10.  Transmission characteristics of a two dimensional antiscatter grid prototype for CBCT.

Authors:  Cem Altunbas; Brian Kavanagh; Timur Alexeev; Moyed Miften
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.