Literature DB >> 27461069

Automated algorithm for CBCT-based dose calculations of prostate radiotherapy with bilateral hip prostheses.

Turki Almatani1, Richard P Hugtenburg1,2, Ryan D Lewis2, Susan E Barley3, Mark A Edwards2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cone beam CT (CBCT) images contain more scatter than a conventional CT image and therefore provide inaccurate Hounsfield units (HUs). Consequently, CBCT images cannot be used directly for radiotherapy dose calculation. The aim of this study is to enable dose calculations to be performed with the use of CBCT images taken during radiotherapy and evaluate the necessity of replanning.
METHODS: A patient with prostate cancer with bilateral metallic prosthetic hip replacements was imaged using both CT and CBCT. The multilevel threshold (MLT) algorithm was used to categorize pixel values in the CBCT images into segments of homogeneous HU. The variation in HU with position in the CBCT images was taken into consideration. This segmentation method relies on the operator dividing the CBCT data into a set of volumes where the variation in the relationship between pixel values and HUs is small. An automated MLT algorithm was developed to reduce the operator time associated with the process. An intensity-modulated radiation therapy plan was generated from CT images of the patient. The plan was then copied to the segmented CBCT (sCBCT) data sets with identical settings, and the doses were recalculated and compared.
RESULTS: Gamma evaluation showed that the percentage of points in the rectum with γ < 1 (3%/3 mm) were 98.7% and 97.7% in the sCBCT using MLT and the automated MLT algorithms, respectively. Compared with the planning CT (pCT) plan, the MLT algorithm showed -0.46% dose difference with 8 h operator time while the automated MLT algorithm showed -1.3%, which are both considered to be clinically acceptable, when using collapsed cone algorithm.
CONCLUSION: The segmentation of CBCT images using the method in this study can be used for dose calculation. For a patient with prostate cancer with bilateral hip prostheses and the associated issues with CT imaging, the MLT algorithms achieved a sufficient dose calculation accuracy that is clinically acceptable. The automated MLT algorithm reduced the operator time associated with implementing the MLT algorithm to achieve clinically acceptable accuracy. This saved time makes the automated MLT algorithm superior and easier to implement in the clinical setting. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The MLT algorithm has been extended to the complex example of a patient with bilateral hip prostheses, which with the introduction of automation is feasible for use in adaptive radiotherapy, as an alternative to obtaining a new pCT and reoutlining the structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27461069      PMCID: PMC5124811          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  17 in total

1.  Flat-panel cone-beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy.

Authors:  David A Jaffray; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen; John W Wong; Alvaro A Martinez
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 2.  Conformity index: a review.

Authors:  Loïc Feuvret; Georges Noël; Jean-Jacques Mazeron; Pierre Bey
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Deformable image registration for contour propagation from CT to cone-beam CT scans in radiotherapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Maria Thor; Jørgen B B Petersen; Lise Bentzen; Morten Høyer; Ludvig Paul Muren
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.089

4.  Feasibility of CBCT-based dose calculation: comparative analysis of HU adjustment techniques.

Authors:  Irina Fotina; Johannes Hopfgartner; Markus Stock; Thomas Steininger; Carola Lütgendorf-Caucig; Dietmar Georg
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 6.280

5.  A new strategy for online adaptive prostate radiotherapy based on cone-beam CT.

Authors:  Ramesh Boggula; Friedlieb Lorenz; Yasser Abo-Madyan; Frank Lohr; Dirk Wolff; Judit Boda-Heggemann; Juergen Hesser; Frederik Wenz; Hansjoerg Wertz
Journal:  Z Med Phys       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 4.820

6.  Image quality and stability of image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) devices: A comparative study.

Authors:  Markus Stock; Marlies Pasler; Wolfgang Birkfellner; Peter Homolka; Richard Poetter; Dietmar Georg
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 6.280

7.  Correction of conebeam CT values using a planning CT for derivation of the "dose of the day".

Authors:  Mathilda van Zijtveld; Maarten Dirkx; Ben Heijmen
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 6.280

8.  Cone beam computed tomography number errors and consequences for radiotherapy planning: an investigation of correction methods.

Authors:  Gavin G Poludniowski; Philip M Evans; Steve Webb
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  A comparison of the quality assurance of four dosimetric tools for intensity modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Jaeman Son; Taesung Baek; Boram Lee; Dongho Shin; Sung Yong Park; Jeonghoon Park; Young Kyung Lim; Se Byeong Lee; Jooyoung Kim; Myonggeun Yoon
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 2.991

10.  Comparison of CT number calibration techniques for CBCT-based dose calculation.

Authors:  Alex Dunlop; Dualta McQuaid; Simeon Nill; Julia Murray; Gavin Poludniowski; Vibeke N Hansen; Shreerang Bhide; Christopher Nutting; Kevin Harrington; Kate Newbold; Uwe Oelfke
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.621

View more
  7 in total

1.  Pelvic multi-organ segmentation on cone-beam CT for prostate adaptive radiotherapy.

Authors:  Yabo Fu; Yang Lei; Tonghe Wang; Sibo Tian; Pretesh Patel; Ashesh B Jani; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  An evaluation of techniques for dose calculation on cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Valentina Giacometti; Raymond B King; Christina E Agnew; Denise M Irvine; Suneil Jain; Alan R Hounsell; Conor K McGarry
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Extended localization and adaptive dose calculation using HU corrected cone beam CT: Phantom study.

Authors:  K Mohamathu Rafic; S Amalan; B S Timothy Peace; B Paul Ravindran
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2018-02-24

4.  Assessing the impact of choosing different deformable registration algorithms on cone-beam CT enhancement by histogram matching.

Authors:  Halima Saadia Kidar; Hacene Azizi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Geometric and Dosimetric Evaluation of Deep Learning-Based Automatic Delineation on CBCT-Synthesized CT and Planning CT for Breast Cancer Adaptive Radiotherapy: A Multi-Institutional Study.

Authors:  Zhenhui Dai; Yiwen Zhang; Lin Zhu; Junwen Tan; Geng Yang; Bailin Zhang; Chunya Cai; Huaizhi Jin; Haoyu Meng; Xiang Tan; Wanwei Jian; Wei Yang; Xuetao Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Cone Beam CT (CBCT) Based Synthetic CT Generation Using Deep Learning Methods for Dose Calculation of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Xudong Xue; Yi Ding; Jun Shi; Xiaoyu Hao; Xiangbin Li; Dan Li; Yuan Wu; Hong An; Man Jiang; Wei Wei; Xiao Wang
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec

7.  Feasibility evaluation of kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography dose calculation following scatter correction: investigations of phantom and representative tumor sites.

Authors:  Huipeng Meng; Xiangjuan Meng; Qingtao Qiu; Yanlong Zhang; Xin Ming; Qifeng Li; Keqiang Wang; Ruohui Zhang; Jinghao Duan
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 1.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.