Literature DB >> 32140087

A new strategy for craniospinal axis localization and adaptive dosimetric evaluation using cone beam CT.

Kather Hussain Mohamathu Rafic1, Christopher Sujith1, Balakrishnan Rajesh1, Ebenezer Suman Babu S1, Peace Balasingh Timothy1, B Selvamani1, Paul B Ravindran1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Computational complexities encountered in craniospinal irradiation (CSI) have been widely investigated with different planning strategies. However, localization of the entire craniospinal axis (CSA) and evaluation of adaptive treatment plans have traditionally been ignored in CSI treatment. In this study, a new strategy for CSI with comprehensive CSA localization and adaptive plan evaluation has been demonstrated using cone beam CT with extended longitudinal field-of-view (CBCTeLFOV).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multi-scan CBCT images were acquired with fixed longitudinal table translations (with 1 cm cone-beam overlap) and then fused into a single DICOM-set using the custom software coded in MatLab™. A novel approach for validation of CBCTeLFOV was demonstrated by combined geometry of Catphan-504 and Catphan-604 phantoms. To simulate actual treatment scenarios, at first, the end-to-end workflow of CSI with VMAT was investigated using an anthropomorphic phantom and then applied for two patients (based on random selection).
RESULTS: The fused CBCTeLFOV images were in excellent agreement with planning CT (pCT). The custom developed software effectively manages spatial misalignments arising out of the uncertainties in treatment/setup geometry. Although the structures mapped from pCT to CBCTeLFOV showed minimal variations, a maximum spatial displacement of up to 1.2 cm (and the mean of 0.8 ± 0.3 cm) was recorded in phantom study. Adaptive plan evaluation of patient paradigms showed the likelihood of under-dosing the craniospinal target.
CONCLUSION: Our protocol serves as a guide for precise localization of entire CSA and to ensure adequate dose to the large and complex targets. It can also be adapted for other complex treatment techniques such as total-marrow-irradiation and total-lymphoid-irradiation.
© 2019 Greater Poland Cancer Centre. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adaptive radiotherapy; Cone beam CT; Craniospinal irradiation; Volumetric modulated arc therapy

Year:  2019        PMID: 32140087      PMCID: PMC7052077          DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2019.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother        ISSN: 1507-1367


  26 in total

1.  A modified technique for craniospinal irradiation in children designed to reduce acute and late radiation toxicity.

Authors:  Claire Phillips; David Willis; Jim Cramb; Franc Chicas-Angulo; Maree Sexton
Journal:  Australas Radiol       Date:  2004-06

2.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc.

Authors:  Karl Otto
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Development and evaluation of multiple isocentric volumetric modulated arc therapy technique for craniospinal axis radiotherapy planning.

Authors:  Young K Lee; Corrinne J Brooks; James L Bedford; Alan P Warrington; Frank H Saran
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Prospective study on dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy and 3DCRT for craniospinal irradiation - A single institution experience.

Authors:  Anna Bandurska-Luque; Tomasz Piotrowski; Agnieszka Skrobała; Adam Ryczkowski; Krystyna Adamska; Joanna Kaźmierska
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2015-01-18

5.  Reducing the dosimetric impact of positional errors in field junctions for craniospinal irradiation using VMAT.

Authors:  Andrej Strojnik; Ignasi Méndez; Primož Peterlin
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2016-03-28

6.  Evaluation of localization errors for craniospinal axis irradiation delivery using volume modulated arc therapy and proposal of a technique to minimize such errors.

Authors:  Pamela Myers; Sotirios Stathakis; Panayiotis Mavroidis; Carlos Esquivel; Niko Papanikolaou
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 6.280

7.  Plan quality and robustness in field junction region for craniospinal irradiation with VMAT.

Authors:  Keqiang Wang; Huipeng Meng; Jie Chen; Wenxue Zhang; Yuanming Feng
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 2.685

8.  Craniospinal irradiation with spinal IMRT to improve target homogeneity.

Authors:  Atmaram Pai Panandiker; Holly Ning; Anna Likhacheva; Karen Ullman; Barbara Arora; John Ondos; Shervin Karimpour; Roger Packer; Robert Miller; Deborah Citrin
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  A single-gradient junction technique to replace multiple-junction shifts for craniospinal irradiation treatment.

Authors:  Austin Hadley; George X Ding
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 1.482

10.  Practical dose delivery verification of craniospinal IMRT.

Authors:  Young K Lee; Anthony T Kim; Peiying Zhao; Aliaksandr Karotki
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.