Literature DB >> 29536592

Listening under difficult conditions: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.

Claude Alain1,2, Yi Du3, Lori J Bernstein4,5, Thijs Barten1, Karen Banai6.   

Abstract

The brain networks supporting speech identification and comprehension under difficult listening conditions are not well specified. The networks hypothesized to underlie effortful listening include regions responsible for executive control. We conducted meta-analyses of auditory neuroimaging studies to determine whether a common activation pattern of the frontal lobe supports effortful listening under different speech manipulations. Fifty-three functional neuroimaging studies investigating speech perception were divided into three independent Activation Likelihood Estimate analyses based on the type of speech manipulation paradigm used: Speech-in-noise (SIN, 16 studies, involving 224 participants); spectrally degraded speech using filtering techniques (15 studies involving 270 participants); and linguistic complexity (i.e., levels of syntactic, lexical and semantic intricacy/density, 22 studies, involving 348 participants). Meta-analysis of the SIN studies revealed higher effort was associated with activation in left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), left inferior parietal lobule, and right insula. Studies using spectrally degraded speech demonstrated increased activation of the insula bilaterally and the left superior temporal gyrus (STG). Studies manipulating linguistic complexity showed activation in the left IFG, right middle frontal gyrus, left middle temporal gyrus and bilateral STG. Planned contrasts revealed left IFG activation in linguistic complexity studies, which differed from activation patterns observed in SIN or spectral degradation studies. Although there were no significant overlap in prefrontal activation across these three speech manipulation paradigms, SIN and spectral degradation showed overlapping regions in left and right insula. These findings provide evidence that there is regional specialization within the left IFG and differential executive networks underlie effortful listening.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory; listening effort; prefrontal cortex; speech

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29536592      PMCID: PMC6866419          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  111 in total

1.  Aging gracefully: compensatory brain activity in high-performing older adults.

Authors:  Roberto Cabeza; Nicole D Anderson; Jill K Locantore; Anthony R McIntosh
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Behavioral and fMRI evidence that cognitive ability modulates the effect of semantic context on speech intelligibility.

Authors:  Adriana A Zekveld; Mary Rudner; Ingrid S Johnsrude; Dirk J Heslenfeld; Jerker Rönnberg
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing speech in noise.

Authors:  Penny Anderson Gosselin; Jean-Pierre Gagné
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  When sentences live up to your expectations.

Authors:  Johannes Tuennerhoff; Uta Noppeney
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Hearing two things at once: neurophysiological indices of speech segregation and identification.

Authors:  Claude Alain; Karen Reinke; Yu He; Chenghua Wang; Nancy Lobaugh
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Dissociable neural imprints of perception and grammar in auditory functional imaging.

Authors:  Björn Herrmann; Jonas Obleser; Christian Kalberlah; John-Dylan Haynes; Angela D Friederici
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Exploring the roles of spectral detail and intonation contour in speech intelligibility: an FMRI study.

Authors:  Jeong S Kyong; Sophie K Scott; Stuart Rosen; Timothy B Howe; Zarinah K Agnew; Carolyn McGettigan
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Hearing Impairment and Cognitive Energy: The Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL).

Authors:  M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Sophia E Kramer; Mark A Eckert; Brent Edwards; Benjamin W Y Hornsby; Larry E Humes; Ulrike Lemke; Thomas Lunner; Mohan Matthen; Carol L Mackersie; Graham Naylor; Natalie A Phillips; Michael Richter; Mary Rudner; Mitchell S Sommers; Kelly L Tremblay; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  "What" and "where" in the human auditory system.

Authors:  C Alain; S R Arnott; S Hevenor; S Graham; C L Grady
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-25       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Perception of words and pitch patterns in song and speech.

Authors:  Julia Merrill; Daniela Sammler; Marc Bangert; Dirk Goldhahn; Gabriele Lohmann; Robert Turner; Angela D Friederici
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-03-19
View more
  28 in total

1.  Acoustic noise and vision differentially warp the auditory categorization of speech.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Lauren Sigley; Gwyneth A Lewis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Age-related hearing loss increases full-brain connectivity while reversing directed signaling within the dorsal-ventral pathway for speech.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Md Sultan Mahmud; Mohammed Yeasin; Dawei Shen; Stephen R Arnott; Claude Alain
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 3.270

3.  Negative polarity in quantifiers evokes greater activation in language-related regions compared to negative polarity in adjectives.

Authors:  Galit Agmon; Jonathan S Bain; Isabelle Deschamps
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-03-07       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The Effect of Positive Psychology Intervention on EFL Learners' Listening Comprehension.

Authors:  Parisa Abdolrezapour; Nasim Ghanbari
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2021-04-28

5.  Afferent-efferent connectivity between auditory brainstem and cortex accounts for poorer speech-in-noise comprehension in older adults.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Caitlin N Price; Dawei Shen; Stephen R Arnott; Claude Alain
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Listening under difficult conditions: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.

Authors:  Claude Alain; Yi Du; Lori J Bernstein; Thijs Barten; Karen Banai
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Plasticity in auditory categorization is supported by differential engagement of the auditory-linguistic network.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Breya Walker
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-07-13       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Late-onset depression is associated to age-related central auditory processing disorder in an older population in Southern Italy.

Authors:  Madia Lozupone; Rodolfo Sardone; Rossella Donghia; Francesca D'Urso; Carla Piccininni; Petronilla Battista; Ilaria Di Gioia; Emanuela Resta; Fabio Castellana; Luisa Lampignano; Roberta Zupo; Ilaria Bortone; Vito Guerra; Chiara Griseta; Davide Seripa; Vincenzo Solfrizzi; Gianluigi Giannelli; Nicola Quaranta; Giancarlo Logroscino; Antonello Bellomo; Francesco Panza
Journal:  Geroscience       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 7.713

9.  Neural networks for sentence comprehension and production: An ALE-based meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Matthew Walenski; Eduardo Europa; David Caplan; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Cingulo-opercular adaptive control for younger and older adults during a challenging gap detection task.

Authors:  Kenneth I Vaden; Mark A Eckert; Judy R Dubno; Kelly C Harris
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 4.164

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.