Literature DB >> 22728131

Behavioral and fMRI evidence that cognitive ability modulates the effect of semantic context on speech intelligibility.

Adriana A Zekveld1, Mary Rudner, Ingrid S Johnsrude, Dirk J Heslenfeld, Jerker Rönnberg.   

Abstract

Text cues facilitate the perception of spoken sentences to which they are semantically related (Zekveld, Rudner, et al., 2011). In this study, semantically related and unrelated cues preceding sentences evoked more activation in middle temporal gyrus (MTG) and inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) than nonword cues, regardless of acoustic quality (speech in noise or speech in quiet). Larger verbal working memory (WM) capacity (reading span) was associated with greater intelligibility benefit obtained from related cues, with less speech-related activation in the left superior temporal gyrus and left anterior IFG, and with more activation in right medial frontal cortex for related versus unrelated cues. Better ability to comprehend masked text was associated with greater ability to disregard unrelated cues, and with more activation in left angular gyrus (AG). We conclude that individual differences in cognitive abilities are related to activation in a speech-sensitive network including left MTG, IFG and AG during cued speech perception.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22728131     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  32 in total

Review 1.  Is Listening in Noise Worth It? The Neurobiology of Speech Recognition in Challenging Listening Conditions.

Authors:  Mark A Eckert; Susan Teubner-Rhodes; Kenneth I Vaden
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  An fMRI study investigating effects of conceptually related sentences on the perception of degraded speech.

Authors:  Sara Guediche; Megan Reilly; Carolina Santiago; Patryk Laurent; Sheila E Blumstein
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  Listening under difficult conditions: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.

Authors:  Claude Alain; Yi Du; Lori J Bernstein; Thijs Barten; Karen Banai
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  The Effect of Aging and Priming on Same/Different Judgments Between Text and Partially Masked Speech.

Authors:  Richard L Freyman; Jenna Terpening; Angela C Costanzi; Karen S Helfer
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Making Sense of Sentences: Top-Down Processing of Speech by Adult Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Jessa Reed
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4) gene modulates the influence of informational masking on speech recognition.

Authors:  Zilong Xie; W Todd Maddox; Valerie S Knopik; John E McGeary; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 7.  The neural processing of masked speech.

Authors:  Sophie K Scott; Carolyn McGettigan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 8.  How linguistic closure and verbal working memory relate to speech recognition in noise--a review.

Authors:  Jana Besser; Thomas Koelewijn; Adriana A Zekveld; Sophia E Kramer; Joost M Festen
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2013-08-13

9.  Tracking Cognitive Spare Capacity During Speech Perception With EEG/ERP: Effects of Cognitive Load and Sentence Predictability.

Authors:  Cynthia R Hunter
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Effects of temporal order and intentionality on reflective attention to words in noise.

Authors:  T M Vanessa Chan; Bradley R Buchsbaum; Claude Alain
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-03-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.