Literature DB >> 33682044

Negative polarity in quantifiers evokes greater activation in language-related regions compared to negative polarity in adjectives.

Galit Agmon1,2, Jonathan S Bain3, Isabelle Deschamps4.   

Abstract

The processing of sentences with negative quantifiers (e.g., few) is more costly than of sentences that contain their positive counterparts (e.g., many). While this polarity effect is robust and reliably replicable, its neurological bases are not well understood. In this study, we use functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) paradigm for 30 participants to assess the polarity effect in sentences with polar quantifiers, and compare it with the polarity effect of polar adjectives. Both in quantifiers and in adjectives, the polarity effect manifests in the anterior insula bilaterally. The polarity effect in quantifiers, however, shows greater activation in the left hemisphere than it does for adjectives. In particular, left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and left superior temporal sulcus (STS) show increased activation for polarity in quantifiers than in adjectives, which is the evidence for the specific involvement of the language network in this type of polarity processing. Using the polarity effect in adjectives as a control, we provide further evidence for the linguistic complexity that negative quantifiers implicate on processing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adjectives; Antonyms; Language; Negation; Polarity; Quantifiers; fMRI

Year:  2021        PMID: 33682044     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-021-06067-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  24 in total

1.  How the brain learns how few are "many": An fMRI study of the flexibility of quantifier semantics.

Authors:  Stefan Heim; Corey T McMillan; Robin Clark; Laura Baehr; Kylie Ternes; Christopher Olm; Nam Eun Min; Murray Grossman
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-10-17       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Neural basis for generalized quantifier comprehension.

Authors:  Corey T McMillan; Robin Clark; Peachie Moore; Christian Devita; Murray Grossman
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Evaluating arcuate fasciculus laterality measurements across dataset and tractography pipelines.

Authors:  Jonathan S Bain; Jason D Yeatman; Roey Schurr; Ariel Rokem; Aviv A Mezer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages.

Authors:  R W Cox
Journal:  Comput Biomed Res       Date:  1996-06

5.  The processing of polar quantifiers, and numerosity perception.

Authors:  Isabelle Deschamps; Galit Agmon; Yonatan Loewenstein; Yosef Grodzinsky
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-07-02

6.  Distinctive neural signatures for negative sentences in Hindi: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Uttam Kumar; Prakash Padakannaya; Ramesh K Mishra; C L Khetrapal
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.978

7.  Listening under difficult conditions: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.

Authors:  Claude Alain; Yi Du; Lori J Bernstein; Thijs Barten; Karen Banai
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Time course of fMRI-activation in language and spatial networks during sentence comprehension.

Authors:  P A Carpenter; M A Just; T A Keller; W F Eddy; K R Thulborn
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Perisylvian Functional Connectivity during Processing of Sentential Negation.

Authors:  Jörg Bahlmann; Jutta L Mueller; Michiru Makuuchi; Angela D Friederici
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-05-31

10.  "Few" or "Many"? An Adaptation Level Theory Account for Flexibility in Quantifier Processing.

Authors:  Stefan Heim; Natalja Peiseler; Natalia Bekemeier
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-03-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.