Literature DB >> 31385349

Cingulo-opercular adaptive control for younger and older adults during a challenging gap detection task.

Kenneth I Vaden1, Mark A Eckert1, Judy R Dubno1, Kelly C Harris1.   

Abstract

Cingulo-opercular activity is hypothesized to reflect an adaptive control function that optimizes task performance through adjustments in attention and behavior, and outcome monitoring. While auditory perceptual task performance appears to benefit from elevated activity in cingulo-opercular regions of frontal cortex before stimuli are presented, this association appears reduced for older adults compared to younger adults. However, adaptive control function may be limited by difficult task conditions for older adults. An fMRI study was used to characterize adaptive control differences while 15 younger (average age = 24 years) and 15 older adults (average age = 68 years) performed a gap detection in noise task designed to limit age-related differences. During the fMRI study, participants listened to a noise recording and indicated with a button-press whether it contained a gap. Stimuli were presented between sparse fMRI scans (TR = 8.6 s) and BOLD measurements were collected during separate listening and behavioral response intervals. Age-related performance differences were limited by presenting gaps in noise with durations calibrated at or above each participant's detection threshold. Cingulo-opercular BOLD increased significantly throughout listening and behavioral response intervals, relative to a resting baseline. Correct behavioral responses were significantly more likely on trials with elevated pre-stimulus cingulo-opercular BOLD, consistent with an adaptive control framework. Cingulo-opercular adaptive control estimates appeared higher for participants with better gap sensitivity and lower response bias, irrespective of age, which suggests that this mechanism can benefit performance across the lifespan under conditions that limit age-related performance differences.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptive control; aging; attention; fMRI; gap detection in noise

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31385349      PMCID: PMC7000297          DOI: 10.1002/jnr.24506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Res        ISSN: 0360-4012            Impact factor:   4.164


  60 in total

1.  Calculation of signal detection theory measures.

Authors:  H Stanislaw; N Todorov
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  1999-02

2.  Aging: a switch from automatic to controlled processing of sounds?

Authors:  Claude Alain; Kelly L McDonald; Jodi M Ostroff; Bruce Schneider
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2004-03

3.  Distinct brain networks for adaptive and stable task control in humans.

Authors:  Nico U F Dosenbach; Damien A Fair; Francis M Miezin; Alexander L Cohen; Kristin K Wenger; Ronny A T Dosenbach; Michael D Fox; Abraham Z Snyder; Justin L Vincent; Marcus E Raichle; Bradley L Schlaggar; Steven E Petersen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Is Listening in Noise Worth It? The Neurobiology of Speech Recognition in Challenging Listening Conditions.

Authors:  Mark A Eckert; Susan Teubner-Rhodes; Kenneth I Vaden
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Ongoing brain activity fluctuations directly account for intertrial and indirectly for intersubject variability in Stroop task performance.

Authors:  Clio P Coste; Sepideh Sadaghiani; Karl J Friston; Andreas Kleinschmidt
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Human evoked cortical activity to silent gaps in noise: effects of age, attention, and cortical processing speed.

Authors:  Kelly C Harris; Sara Wilson; Mark A Eckert; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Cingulo-opercular activity affects incidental memory encoding for speech in noise.

Authors:  Kenneth I Vaden; Susan Teubner-Rhodes; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Task-Related Vigilance During Word Recognition in Noise for Older Adults with Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Stefanie E Kuchinsky; Kenneth I Vaden; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Stephanie L Cute; Larry E Humes; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.645

9.  A method for removal of global effects from fMRI time series.

Authors:  Paul M Macey; Katherine E Macey; Rajesh Kumar; Ronald M Harper
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Phonological repetition-suppression in bilateral superior temporal sulci.

Authors:  Kenneth I Vaden; L Tugan Muftuler; Gregory Hickok
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  5 in total

1.  Unique patterns of hearing loss and cognition in older adults' neural responses to cues for speech recognition difficulty.

Authors:  Mark A Eckert; Susan Teubner-Rhodes; Kenneth I Vaden; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Carolyn M McClaskey; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-10-10       Impact factor: 3.748

2.  Cognitive and neural predictors of speech comprehension in noisy backgrounds in older adults.

Authors:  Megan C Fitzhugh; Sydney Y Schaefer; Leslie C Baxter; Corianne Rogalsky
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-04       Impact factor: 2.331

3.  Gender-related differences in frontal-parietal modular segregation and altered effective connectivity in internet gaming disorder.

Authors:  Ningning Zeng; Min Wang; Hui Zheng; Jialin Zhang; Haohao Dong; Marc N Potenza; Guang-Heng Dong
Journal:  J Behav Addict       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 6.756

4.  Temporal selectivity declines in the aging human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Julia Erb; Lea-Maria Schmitt; Jonas Obleser
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Evidence for cortical adjustments to perceptual decision criteria during word recognition in noise.

Authors:  Kenneth I Vaden; Susan Teubner-Rhodes; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2022-03-06       Impact factor: 7.400

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.