Literature DB >> 27355771

Hearing Impairment and Cognitive Energy: The Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL).

M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller1, Sophia E Kramer, Mark A Eckert, Brent Edwards, Benjamin W Y Hornsby, Larry E Humes, Ulrike Lemke, Thomas Lunner, Mohan Matthen, Carol L Mackersie, Graham Naylor, Natalie A Phillips, Michael Richter, Mary Rudner, Mitchell S Sommers, Kelly L Tremblay, Arthur Wingfield.   

Abstract

The Fifth Eriksholm Workshop on "Hearing Impairment and Cognitive Energy" was convened to develop a consensus among interdisciplinary experts about what is known on the topic, gaps in knowledge, the use of terminology, priorities for future research, and implications for practice. The general term cognitive energy was chosen to facilitate the broadest possible discussion of the topic. It goes back to who described the effects of attention on perception; he used the term psychic energy for the notion that limited mental resources can be flexibly allocated among perceptual and mental activities. The workshop focused on three main areas: (1) theories, models, concepts, definitions, and frameworks; (2) methods and measures; and (3) knowledge translation. We defined effort as the deliberate allocation of mental resources to overcome obstacles in goal pursuit when carrying out a task, with listening effort applying more specifically when tasks involve listening. We adapted Kahneman's seminal (1973) Capacity Model of Attention to listening and proposed a heuristically useful Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL). Our FUEL incorporates the well-known relationship between cognitive demand and the supply of cognitive capacity that is the foundation of cognitive theories of attention. Our FUEL also incorporates a motivation dimension based on complementary theories of motivational intensity, adaptive gain control, and optimal performance, fatigue, and pleasure. Using a three-dimensional illustration, we highlight how listening effort depends not only on hearing difficulties and task demands but also on the listener's motivation to expend mental effort in the challenging situations of everyday life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27355771     DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  196 in total

Review 1.  [Speech comprehension and cognitive performance in acoustically difficult situations].

Authors:  H Meister
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Top-down or bottom up: decreased stimulus salience increases responses to predictable stimuli of auditory thalamic neurons.

Authors:  Srinivasa P Kommajosyula; Rui Cai; Edward Bartlett; Donald M Caspary
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2019-04-21       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Evidence for enhanced neural tracking of the speech envelope underlying age-related speech-in-noise difficulties.

Authors:  Lien Decruy; Jonas Vanthornhout; Tom Francart
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Variations Within Normal Hearing Acuity and Speech Comprehension: An Exploratory Study.

Authors:  Nicole D Ayasse; Lana R Penn; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 1.493

5.  The effect of fundamental frequency contour similarity on multi-talker listening in older and younger adults.

Authors:  Peter A Wasiuk; Mathieu Lavandier; Emily Buss; Jacob Oleson; Lauren Calandruccio
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Pupillometry shows the effort of auditory attention switching.

Authors:  Daniel R McCloy; Bonnie K Lau; Eric Larson; Katherine A I Pratt; Adrian K C Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Talking points: A modulating circle reduces listening effort without improving speech recognition.

Authors:  Julia F Strand; Violet A Brown; Dennis L Barbour
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

8.  Benefit of binaural listening as revealed by speech intelligibility and listening effort.

Authors:  Jan Rennies; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 9.  Hearing Loss: Why Does It Matter for Nursing Homes?

Authors:  Ellen M McCreedy; Barbara E Weinstein; Joshua Chodosh; Jan Blustein
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.669

10.  Listening Effort Measured in Adults with Normal Hearing and Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Ann E Perreau; Yu-Hsiang Wu; Bailey Tatge; Diana Irwin; Daniel Corts
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.