Literature DB >> 31479953

Afferent-efferent connectivity between auditory brainstem and cortex accounts for poorer speech-in-noise comprehension in older adults.

Gavin M Bidelman1, Caitlin N Price2, Dawei Shen3, Stephen R Arnott3, Claude Alain4.   

Abstract

Speech-in-noise (SIN) comprehension deficits in older adults have been linked to changes in both subcortical and cortical auditory evoked responses. However, older adults' difficulty understanding SIN may also be related to an imbalance in signal transmission (i.e., functional connectivity) between brainstem and auditory cortices. By modeling high-density scalp recordings of speech-evoked responses with sources in brainstem (BS) and bilateral primary auditory cortices (PAC), we show that beyond attenuating neural activity, hearing loss in older adults compromises the transmission of speech information between subcortical and early cortical hubs of the speech network. We found that the strength of afferent BS→PAC neural signaling (but not the reverse efferent flow; PAC→BS) varied with mild declines in hearing acuity and this "bottom-up" functional connectivity robustly predicted older adults' performance in a SIN identification task. Connectivity was also a better predictor of SIN processing than unitary subcortical or cortical responses alone. Our neuroimaging findings suggest that in older adults (i) mild hearing loss differentially reduces neural output at several stages of auditory processing (PAC > BS), (ii) subcortical-cortical connectivity is more sensitive to peripheral hearing loss than top-down (cortical-subcortical) control, and (iii) reduced functional connectivity in afferent auditory pathways plays a significant role in SIN comprehension problems.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging; Auditory cortex; Auditory evoked potentials; Frequency-following response (FFR); Functional connectivity; Neural speech processing; Source waveform analysis

Year:  2019        PMID: 31479953      PMCID: PMC6778515          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2019.107795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  112 in total

1.  The correction of ocular artifacts: a topographic perspective.

Authors:  T W Picton; P van Roon; M L Armilio; P Berg; N Ille; M Scherg
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing speech in noise.

Authors:  Penny Anderson Gosselin; Jean-Pierre Gagné
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Enhanced attention-dependent activity in the auditory cortex of older musicians.

Authors:  Benjamin Rich Zendel; Claude Alain
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 4.673

4.  Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  J R Dubno; A B Schaefer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Corticofugal regulation of auditory sensitivity in the bat inferior colliculus.

Authors:  P H Jen; Q C Chen; X D Sun
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Age-related hearing loss increases full-brain connectivity while reversing directed signaling within the dorsal-ventral pathway for speech.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Md Sultan Mahmud; Mohammed Yeasin; Dawei Shen; Stephen R Arnott; Claude Alain
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 3.270

7.  A neural basis of speech-in-noise perception in older adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Han-Gyol Yi; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Coordinated plasticity in brainstem and auditory cortex contributes to enhanced categorical speech perception in musicians.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Michael W Weiss; Sylvain Moreno; Claude Alain
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Evidence of degraded representation of speech in noise, in the aging midbrain and cortex.

Authors:  Alessandro Presacco; Jonathan Z Simon; Samira Anderson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Aging alters the perception and physiological representation of frequency: evidence from human frequency-following response recordings.

Authors:  Christopher G Clinard; Kelly L Tremblay; Ananthanarayan R Krishnan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  8 in total

1.  Age-related hearing loss increases full-brain connectivity while reversing directed signaling within the dorsal-ventral pathway for speech.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Md Sultan Mahmud; Mohammed Yeasin; Dawei Shen; Stephen R Arnott; Claude Alain
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 3.270

2.  Speech Understanding Oppositely Affects Acoustic and Linguistic Neural Tracking in a Speech Rate Manipulation Paradigm.

Authors:  Eline Verschueren; Marlies Gillis; Lien Decruy; Jonas Vanthornhout; Tom Francart
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 6.709

Review 3.  Diverse functions of the auditory cortico-collicular pathway.

Authors:  Alexandria M H Lesicko; Maria N Geffen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2022-03-20       Impact factor: 3.672

4.  Subcortical rather than cortical sources of the frequency-following response (FFR) relate to speech-in-noise perception in normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Sara Momtaz
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Rapid Perceptual Learning: A Potential Source of Individual Differences in Speech Perception Under Adverse Conditions?

Authors:  Tali Rotman; Limor Lavie; Karen Banai
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  Rapid Enhancement of Subcortical Neural Responses to Sine-Wave Speech.

Authors:  Fan-Yin Cheng; Can Xu; Lisa Gold; Spencer Smith
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined With Listening to Preferred Music Alters Cortical Speech Processing in Older Adults.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Ricky Chow; Alix Noly-Gandon; Jennifer D Ryan; Karen L Bell; Rose Rizzi; Claude Alain
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 5.152

8.  Decoding Hearing-Related Changes in Older Adults' Spatiotemporal Neural Processing of Speech Using Machine Learning.

Authors:  Md Sultan Mahmud; Faruk Ahmed; Rakib Al-Fahad; Kazi Ashraf Moinuddin; Mohammed Yeasin; Claude Alain; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 4.677

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.