Literature DB >> 29520566

Effective-dose estimation in interventional radiological procedures.

Maria D Falco1,2, Salvatore Masala3, Matteo Stefanini4, Paolo Bagalà4, Daniele Morosetti4, Eros Calabria4, Alessia Tonnetti5, Gianluca Verona-Rinati5.   

Abstract

Interventional radiology is based on minimally invasive procedures that allow diagnosis and percutaneous treatment of diseases in almost all organ systems. Such procedures have many benefits, but they also contribute significantly to collective radiation dose. In this regard, effective dose (E) is a convenient quantity to estimate patients' stochastic radiation risk. However, E cannot be accurately evaluated immediately. In the present study, we aimed to estimate the E value in 15 selected interventional procedures. The estimation was based on dose area product (DAP) measurements and used case-specific conversion coefficients. The E values ranged from 3.3 to 69.9 mSv, depending on the kind of procedure. This wide range was mainly due to the broad variation in DAP values, which in turn depend on the details of how the procedures are performed. This suggests that to ensure valid comparative studies and universal reference levels, all interventional procedures should be well classified.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conversion coefficients; Dose area product; Effective dose; Radiological interventional procedures

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29520566     DOI: 10.1007/s12194-018-0446-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol        ISSN: 1865-0333


  25 in total

1.  Effective doses in angiography and interventional radiology: calculation of conversion coefficients for angiography of the lower limbs.

Authors:  L Struelens; F Vanhavere; H Bosmans; R Van Loon
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

3.  Radiation exposure to patients and radiologists during interventional procedures.

Authors:  E Molyvda-Athanasopoulou; M Karlatira; A Gotzamani-Psarrakou; Ch Koulouris; A Siountas
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 0.972

4.  Calculation of conversion factors for effective dose for various interventional radiology procedures.

Authors:  Gaetano Compagnone; Emanuela Giampalma; Sara Domenichelli; Matteo Renzulli; Rita Golfieri
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Patient and staff dosimetry in vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Niki T Fitousi; Efstathios P Efstathopoulos; Harry B Delis; Sofia Kottou; Alexis D Kelekis; George S Panayiotakis
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Comparison of effective doses obtained from dose-area product and air kerma measurements in interventional radiology.

Authors:  D Bor; T Sancak; T Olgar; Y Elcim; A Adanali; U Sanlidilek; S Akyar
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 7.  Fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures: a review of radiation effects on patients' skin and hair.

Authors:  Stephen Balter; John W Hopewell; Donald L Miller; Louis K Wagner; Michael J Zelefsky
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Patient dosimetry approaches in interventional cardiology and literature dose data review.

Authors:  R Padovani; E Quai
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 0.972

9.  Fluoroscopically guided percutaneous vertebroplasty: assessment of radiation doses and implementation of procedural routines to reduce operator exposure.

Authors:  A von Wrangel; A Cederblad; M Rodriguez-Catarino
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.990

10.  Radiation dose in neuroangiography using image noise reduction technology: a population study based on 614 patients.

Authors:  Michael Söderman; Maria Mauti; Sjirk Boon; Artur Omar; María Marteinsdóttir; Tommy Andersson; Staffan Holmin; Bart Hoornaert
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 2.804

View more
  4 in total

1.  Proposal of a new method to prove that unnecessary information is not drawn on the image using statistical analysis.

Authors:  Takaaki Isayama; Sadamitsu Nishihara; Hideki Otsuka
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2019-03-11

2.  Pitfalls in interventional X-ray organ dose assessment-combined experimental and computational phantom study: application to prostatic artery embolization.

Authors:  Philipp Roser; Annette Birkhold; Xia Zhong; Philipp Ochs; Elizaveta Stepina; Markus Kowarschik; Rebecca Fahrig; Andreas Maier
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2019-08-03       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Radiation dose reference card for interventional radiology procedures: Experience in a tertiary referral centre.

Authors:  Anna Varghese; Shyamkumar N Keshava; Vinu Moses; George Koshy; Suraj Mammen; Munawwar Ahmed; Roshan S Livingstone
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2019-10-30

4.  XDose: toward online cross-validation of experimental and computational X-ray dose estimation.

Authors:  Philipp Roser; Annette Birkhold; Alexander Preuhs; Philipp Ochs; Elizaveta Stepina; Norbert Strobel; Markus Kowarschik; Rebecca Fahrig; Andreas Maier
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 2.924

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.