Literature DB >> 22559619

Calculation of conversion factors for effective dose for various interventional radiology procedures.

Gaetano Compagnone1, Emanuela Giampalma, Sara Domenichelli, Matteo Renzulli, Rita Golfieri.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To provide dose-area-product (DAP) to effective dose (E) conversion factors for complete interventional procedures, based on in-the-field clinical measurements of DAP values and using tabulated E/DAP conversion factors for single projections available from the literature.
METHODS: Nine types of interventional procedures were performed on 84 patients with two angiographic systems. Different calibration curves (with and without patient table attenuation) were calculated for each DAP meter. Clinical and dosimetric parameters were recorded in-the-field for each projection and for all patients, and a conversion factor linking DAP and effective doses was derived for each complete procedure making use of published, Monte Carlo calculated conversion factors for single static projections.
RESULTS: Fluoroscopy time and DAP values for the lowest-dose procedure (biliary drainage) were approximately 3-fold and 13-fold lower, respectively, than those for the highest-dose examination (transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, TIPS). Median E/DAP conversion factors from 0.12 (abdominal percutaneous transluminal angioplasty) to 0.25 (Nephrostomy) mSvGy(-1) cm(-2) were obtained and good correlations between E and DAP were found for all procedures, with R(2) coefficients ranging from 0.80 (abdominal angiography) to 0.99 (biliary stent insertion, Nephrostomy and TIPS). The DAP values obtained in this study showed general consistency with the values provided in the literature and median E values ranged from 4.0 mSv (biliary drainage) to 49.6 mSv (TIPS).
CONCLUSIONS: Values of E/DAP conversion factors were derived for each procedure from a comprehensive analysis of projection and dosimetric data: they could provide a good evaluation for the stochastic effects. These results can be obtained by means of a close cooperation between different interventional professionals involved in patient care and dose optimization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22559619     DOI: 10.1118/1.3702457

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  20 in total

1.  Summary of the Italian inter-society recommendations for radiation protection optimization in interventional radiology.

Authors:  Gaetano Compagnone; Renato Padovani; Maria Antonietta D'Avanzo; Sveva Grande; Francesco Campanella; Antonella Rosi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Effective-dose estimation in interventional radiological procedures.

Authors:  Maria D Falco; Salvatore Masala; Matteo Stefanini; Paolo Bagalà; Daniele Morosetti; Eros Calabria; Alessia Tonnetti; Gianluca Verona-Rinati
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2018-03-08

3.  Factors influencing cumulative radiation dose from percutaneous intra-abdominal abscess drainage in the setting of inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Thomas J An; Azadeh Tabari; Michael S Gee; Colin J McCarthy
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-11-25

Review 4.  Morphological, dynamic and functional characteristics of liver pseudolesions and benign lesions.

Authors:  Matteo Renzulli; Nicolò Brandi; Giulia Argalia; Stefano Brocchi; Andrea Farolfi; Stefano Fanti; Rita Golfieri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Segmental Distribution of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Cirrhotic Livers.

Authors:  Matteo Renzulli; Nicolò Brandi; Anna Pecorelli; Luigi Vincenzo Pastore; Alessandro Granito; Giuseppe Martinese; Francesco Tovoli; Mario Simonetti; Elton Dajti; Antonio Colecchia; Rita Golfieri
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-29

6.  Does multiparametric US improve diagnostic accuracy in the characterization of small testicular masses?

Authors:  Alfonso Reginelli; Alfredo D'Andrea; Alfredo Clemente; Andrea Izzo; Fabrizio Urraro; Fernando Scala; Valerio Nardone; Cesare Guida; Michele Scialpi; Salvatore Cappabianca
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-09

7.  Delayed enhancement in differential diagnosis of salivary gland neoplasm.

Authors:  Alfonso Reginelli; Alfredo Clemente; Matteo Renzulli; Nicola Maggialetti; Mario Santagata; Giuseppe Colella; Valerio Nardone; Rita Golfieri; Luca Brunese; Salvatore Cappabianca
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-09

8.  Investigations of organ and effective doses of abdominal cone-beam computed tomography during transarterial chemoembolization using Monte Carlo simulation.

Authors:  Yi-Shuan Hwang; Hui-Yu Tsai; Yu-Ying Lin; Kar-Wai Lui
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 1.930

9.  Conversion coefficients for the estimation of effective dose in cone-beam CT.

Authors:  Dong-Soo Kim; Oyuntugs Rashsuren; Eun-Kyung Kim
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2014-03-19

10.  Evaluation of the Benefits of TACE Combined with Sorafenib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Based on Untreatable TACE (unTACEable) Progression.

Authors:  Xinhua Zou; Wenzhe Fan; Miao Xue; Jiaping Li
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.