Literature DB >> 19363715

Fluoroscopically guided percutaneous vertebroplasty: assessment of radiation doses and implementation of procedural routines to reduce operator exposure.

A von Wrangel1, A Cederblad, M Rodriguez-Catarino.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) is a fluoroscopically guided procedure for the treatment of painful vertebral compression fractures and metastases. Routine legal personal dosimetry repeatedly showed dosimeter doses exceeding 1 mSv/month for the only radiologist performing PVP at our hospital. Based on the nature of the procedure, this raised concern about potentially high doses to the eyes and fingers.
PURPOSE: To assess radiation doses to the operator, and to evaluate possibilities for dose reduction.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Measurements of scattered radiation in simulated thoracic and lumbar PVP procedures were performed using two anatomical phantoms--thorax and lower trunk--and a radiation survey meter. The standard position of the operator was determined as being 50 cm from the irradiated area of the phantom. The protection ability of lead-free gloves was evaluated during the simulations. Operator doses to fingers and eyes during 10 clinical PVP procedures performed by a single operator were measured, and the annual dose was calculated. Routine personal dosimetry was performed using thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) badges beneath the lead apron, and doses to fingers and eyes were measured with small TLD tablets.
RESULTS: During simulations, the measured operator dose rate arising from lateral fluoroscopy at the thorax and lumbar level was reduced by a factor of 4-5 when the X-ray tube was moved from the operator's side of the patient to the opposite side. Wearing protective gloves reduced radiation dose to the hands by 30-40%. The mean doses arising from the 10 clinical PVP procedures to the right and left hands, using protection gloves, were 2.0 mSv and 4.8 mSv, respectively. The mean dose to the eyes was 0.23 mSv. The mean effective dose to the patients was 12 mSv.
CONCLUSION: Placing the X-ray tube on the side of the patient opposite to the operator and the use of radiation protection gloves significantly reduces radiation exposure to the operator. In phantom simulations, the dose was reduced by a factor of 4-5. Knowledge of fluoroscopy equipment, radiation physics, and protection is essential in order to reduce exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19363715     DOI: 10.1080/02841850902855391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  7 in total

1.  Mobile C-arm cone-beam CT for guidance of spine surgery: image quality, radiation dose, and integration with interventional guidance.

Authors:  S Schafer; S Nithiananthan; D J Mirota; A Uneri; J W Stayman; W Zbijewski; C Schmidgunst; G Kleinszig; A J Khanna; J H Siewerdsena
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Is lead shielding of patients necessary during fluoroscopic procedures? A study based on kyphoplasty.

Authors:  Joshua R Smith; Rebecca M Marsh; Michael S Silosky
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Effective-dose estimation in interventional radiological procedures.

Authors:  Maria D Falco; Salvatore Masala; Matteo Stefanini; Paolo Bagalà; Daniele Morosetti; Eros Calabria; Alessia Tonnetti; Gianluca Verona-Rinati
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2018-03-08

Review 4.  Does less invasive spine surgery result in increased radiation exposure? A systematic review.

Authors:  Elizabeth Yu; Safdar N Khan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Patient skin dose measurements using a cable free system MOSFETs based in fluoroscopically guided percutaneous vertebroplasty, percutaneous disc decompression, radiofrequency medial branch neurolysis, and endovascular critical limb ischemia.

Authors:  Maria D Falco; Salvatore Masala; Matteo Stefanini; Roberto Fiori; Roberto Gandini; Paolo Bagalà; Daniele Morosetti; Eros Calabria; Alessia Tonnetti; Gianluca Verona-Rinati; Riccardo Santoni; Giovanni Simonetti
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Investigation of X-ray permeability of surgical gloves coated with different contrast agents.

Authors:  Mustafa Kayan; Selçuk Yaşar; Mustafa Saygın; Ömer Yılmaz; Aykut Recep Aktaş; Fatmanur Kayan; Yasin Türker; Gürsel Çetinkaya
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 1.596

7.  Time to take the gloves off: the use of radiation reduction gloves can greatly increase patient dose.

Authors:  Alexander S Pasciak; A Kyle Jones
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.