Literature DB >> 16601097

Sparse time-frequency representations.

Timothy J Gardner1, Marcelo O Magnasco.   

Abstract

Auditory neurons preserve exquisite temporal information about sound features, but we do not know how the brain uses this information to process the rapidly changing sounds of the natural world. Simple arguments for effective use of temporal information led us to consider the reassignment class of time-frequency representations as a model of auditory processing. Reassigned time-frequency representations can track isolated simple signals with accuracy unlimited by the time-frequency uncertainty principle, but lack of a general theory has hampered their application to complex sounds. We describe the reassigned representations for white noise and show that even spectrally dense signals produce sparse reassignments: the representation collapses onto a thin set of lines arranged in a froth-like pattern. Preserving phase information allows reconstruction of the original signal. We define a notion of "consensus," based on stability of reassignment to time-scale changes, which produces sharp spectral estimates for a wide class of complex mixed signals. As the only currently known class of time-frequency representations that is always "in focus" this methodology has general utility in signal analysis. It may also help explain the remarkable acuity of auditory perception. Many details of complex sounds that are virtually undetectable in standard sonograms are readily perceptible and visible in reassignment.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16601097      PMCID: PMC1431718          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0601707103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  22 in total

1.  Thalamocortical synapses: sparse but stentorian.

Authors:  A Zador
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Cross-spectral methods for processing speech.

Authors:  D J Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The birth of a quasiparticle in silicon observed in time-frequency space.

Authors:  Muneaki Hase; Masahiro Kitajima; Anca Monia Constantinescu; Hrvoje Petek
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-11-06       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Yeyi clicks: acoustic description and analysis.

Authors:  Sean A Fulop; Peter Ladefoged; Fang Liu; Rainer Vossen
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  2003 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.759

5.  United time-frequency spectroscopy for dynamics and global structure.

Authors:  Adela Marian; Matthew C Stowe; John R Lawall; Daniel Felinto; Jun Ye
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-11-18       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  A duplex theory of pitch perception.

Authors:  J C R LICKLIDER
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1951-04-15

7.  Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images.

Authors:  B A Olshausen; D J Field
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-06-13       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Neural correlates of the pitch of complex tones. I. Pitch and pitch salience.

Authors:  P A Cariani; B Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  A pulse ribbon model of monaural phase perception.

Authors:  R D Patterson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Acoustic parameters underlying the responses of song-specific neurons in the white-crowned sparrow.

Authors:  D Margoliash
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  12 in total

1.  Decoding spike timing: the differential reverse-correlation method.

Authors:  Gasper Tkacik; Marcelo O Magnasco
Journal:  Biosystems       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Comparison of time-frequency methods for analyzing stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Milan Biswal; Srikanta K Mishra
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  A bird's eye view of neural circuit formation.

Authors:  Bence P Olveczky; Timothy J Gardner
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Neural processing of short-term recurrence in songbird vocal communication.

Authors:  Gabriël J L Beckers; Manfred Gahr
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Pitch- and spectral-based dynamic time warping methods for comparing field recordings of harmonic avian vocalizations.

Authors:  C Daniel Meliza; Sara C Keen; Dustin R Rubenstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Long-range order in canary song.

Authors:  Jeffrey E Markowitz; Elizabeth Ivie; Laura Kligler; Timothy J Gardner
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Degraded time-frequency acuity to time-reversed notes.

Authors:  Jacob N Oppenheim; Pavel Isakov; Marcelo O Magnasco
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Learning the microstructure of successful behavior.

Authors:  Jonathan D Charlesworth; Evren C Tumer; Timothy L Warren; Michael S Brainard
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of word processing in the human brain.

Authors:  Ryan T Canolty; Maryam Soltani; Sarang S Dalal; Erik Edwards; Nina F Dronkers; Srikantan S Nagarajan; Heidi E Kirsch; Nicholas M Barbaro; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Adaptive multimode signal reconstruction from time-frequency representations.

Authors:  Sylvain Meignen; Thomas Oberlin; Philippe Depalle; Patrick Flandrin; Stephen McLaughlin
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.