Literature DB >> 16001277

Duration estimation and the phonological loop: articulatory suppression and irrelevant sounds.

Vicky Franssen1, André Vandierendonck, Alain Van Hiel.   

Abstract

Clock-based theories of time estimation propose that clock pulses are accumulated in working memory. Although these theories do not constrain the form of the memory trace, evidence reported in the literature suggests that active manipulation of a verbal trace may be involved. Four experiments are reported in which participants reproduced or verbally estimated short durations (up to a few seconds) either in a single-task condition or in a condition with a phonological load. Experiments 1, 2 and 4 showed that both interval reproduction and verbal estimation were impaired under concurrent articulatory suppression in comparison to a timing only control condition. Neither irrelevant speech (Experiments 1-3) nor irrelevant tones and music (Experiment 3) impaired timing performance. These findings are taken to show that time estimation is mediated by phonological working memory and the involvement of an active articulatory rehearsal process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16001277     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-005-0217-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  25 in total

1.  Dissociation between activation and attention effects in time estimation: implications for internal clock models.

Authors:  B Burle; L Casini
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Time estimation: does the reference memory mediate the effect of knowledge of results?

Authors:  Vicky Franssen; André Vandierendonck
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2002-03

3.  Interference from short-term memory processing on encoding and reproducing brief durations.

Authors:  C Fortin; R Rousseau
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1998

4.  Effects of attention manipulation on judgments of duration and of intensity in the visual modality.

Authors:  L Casini; F Macar
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-11

5.  Switching or gating? The attentional challenge in cognitive models of psychological time.

Authors:  H Lejeune
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.777

6.  Further learning effects of knowledge of results upon time estimation.

Authors:  A Montare
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1988-04

7.  Temporal interval production and processing in working memory.

Authors:  C Fortin; R Breton
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-02

8.  Is judgment of random time intervals biased and capacity-limited?

Authors:  A Vandierendonck
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2000

9.  Disruption of verbal STM by irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, and manual tapping: do they have a common source?

Authors:  Janet D Larsen; Alan Baddeley
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2003-11

Review 10.  Feeling the heat: body temperature and the rate of subjective time, revisited.

Authors:  J H Wearden; I S Penton-Voak
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  1995-05
View more
  5 in total

1.  Modality-independent role of the primary auditory cortex in time estimation.

Authors:  Ryota Kanai; Harriet Lloyd; Domenica Bueti; Vincent Walsh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Short-term memory for auditory and visual durations: evidence for selective interference effects.

Authors:  Anne-Claire Rattat; Delphine Picard
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-03-04

3.  Reducing the tendency for chronometric counting in duration discrimination tasks.

Authors:  Martin Riemer; Paula Vieweg; Hedderik van Rijn; Thomas Wolbers
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  The sensory representation of time.

Authors:  Domenica Bueti
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-08

5.  Neural oscillations associated with auditory duration maintenance in working memory.

Authors:  Xiaolin Yu; Youguo Chen; Junjie Qiu; Xiang Li; Xiting Huang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.