Literature DB >> 29427848

Targeting alpha-band oscillations in a cortical model with amplitude-modulated high-frequency transcranial electric stimulation.

Ehsan Negahbani1, Florian H Kasten2, Christoph S Herrmann3, Flavio Fröhlich4.   

Abstract

Non-invasive brain stimulation to target specific network activity patterns, e.g. transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), has become an essential tool to understand the causal role of neuronal oscillations in cognition and behavior. However, conventional sinusoidal tACS limits the ability to record neuronal activity during stimulation and lacks spatial focality. One particularly promising new tACS stimulation paradigm uses amplitude-modulated (AM) high-frequency waveforms (AM-tACS) with a slow signal envelope that may overcome the limitations. Moreover. AM-tACS using high-frequency carrier signals is more tolerable than conventional tACS, e.g. in terms of skin irritation and occurrence of phosphenes, when applied at the same current intensities (e.g. 1-2 mA). Yet, the fundamental mechanism of neuronal target-engagement by AM-tACS waveforms has remained unknown. We used a computational model of cortex to investigate how AM-tACS modulates endogenous oscillations and compared the target engagement mechanism to the case of conventional (unmodulated) low-frequency tACS. Analysis of stimulation amplitude and frequency indicated that cortical oscillations were phase-locked to the envelope of the AM stimulation signal, which thus exhibits the same target engagement mechanism as conventional (unmodulated) low frequency tACS. However, in the computational model substantially higher current intensities were needed for AM-tACS than for low-frequency (unmodulated) tACS waveforms to achieve pronounced phase synchronization. Our analysis of the carrier frequency suggests that there might be a trade-off between the use of high-frequency carriers and the stimulation amplitude required for successful entrainment. Together, our computational simulations support the use of slow-envelope high frequency carrier AM waveforms as a tool for noninvasive modulation of brain oscillations. More empirical data will be needed to identify the optimal stimulation parameters and to evaluate tolerability and safety of both, AM- and conventional tACS.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amplitude modulation; Brain stimulation; Computer simulation; Target engagement; Transcranial alternating current stimulation; tACS

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29427848      PMCID: PMC5911251          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  57 in total

Review 1.  Interneurons of the neocortical inhibitory system.

Authors:  Henry Markram; Maria Toledo-Rodriguez; Yun Wang; Anirudh Gupta; Gilad Silberberg; Caizhi Wu
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Single-column thalamocortical network model exhibiting gamma oscillations, sleep spindles, and epileptogenic bursts.

Authors:  Roger D Traub; Diego Contreras; Mark O Cunningham; Hilary Murray; Fiona E N LeBeau; Anita Roopun; Andrea Bibbig; W Bryan Wilent; Michael J Higley; Miles A Whittington
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-11-03       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Frequency-dependent enhancement of fluid intelligence induced by transcranial oscillatory potentials.

Authors:  Emiliano Santarnecchi; Nicola Riccardo Polizzotto; Marco Godone; Fabio Giovannelli; Matteo Feurra; Laura Matzen; Alessandro Rossi; Simone Rossi
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 4.  Animal models of transcranial direct current stimulation: Methods and mechanisms.

Authors:  Mark P Jackson; Asif Rahman; Belen Lafon; Gregory Kronberg; Doris Ling; Lucas C Parra; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Both the cutaneous sensation and phosphene perception are modulated in a frequency-specific manner during transcranial alternating current stimulation.

Authors:  Zs Turi; G G Ambrus; K Janacsek; K Emmert; L Hahn; W Paulus; A Antal
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.406

6.  POTENTIAL, IMPEDANCE, AND RECTIFICATION IN MEMBRANES.

Authors:  D E Goldman
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1943-09-20       Impact factor: 4.086

7.  Safety of 5 kHz tACS.

Authors:  Leila Chaieb; Andrea Antal; Alberto Pisoni; Catarina Saiote; Alexander Opitz; Géza Gergely Ambrus; Niels Focke; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 8.  EEG alpha oscillations: the inhibition-timing hypothesis.

Authors:  Wolfgang Klimesch; Paul Sauseng; Simon Hanslmayr
Journal:  Brain Res Rev       Date:  2006-08-01

9.  Alpha Power Increase After Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation at Alpha Frequency (α-tACS) Reflects Plastic Changes Rather Than Entrainment.

Authors:  Alexandra Vossen; Joachim Gross; Gregor Thut
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 8.955

10.  Computing the Local Field Potential (LFP) from Integrate-and-Fire Network Models.

Authors:  Alberto Mazzoni; Henrik Lindén; Hermann Cuntz; Anders Lansner; Stefano Panzeri; Gaute T Einevoll
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  19 in total

1.  Electrophysiology equipment for reliable study of kHz electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Mohamad FallahRad; Adantchede Louis Zannou; Niranjan Khadka; Steven A Prescott; Stéphanie Ratté; Tianhe Zhang; Rosana Esteller; Brad Hershey; Marom Bikson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 2.  Transcranial electrical stimulation nomenclature.

Authors:  Marom Bikson; Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Devin Adair; Greg Kronberg; William J Tyler; Andrea Antal; Abhishek Datta; Bernhard A Sabel; Michael A Nitsche; Colleen Loo; Dylan Edwards; Hamed Ekhtiari; Helena Knotkova; Adam J Woods; Benjamin M Hampstead; Bashar W Badran; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 3.  Current challenges: the ups and downs of tACS.

Authors:  Nicholas S Bland; Martin V Sale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Evidence of Neuroplastic Changes after Transcranial Magnetic, Electric, and Deep Brain Stimulation.

Authors:  Julius Kricheldorff; Katharina Göke; Maximilian Kiebs; Florian H Kasten; Christoph S Herrmann; Karsten Witt; Rene Hurlemann
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-07-15

5.  Parametric study of transcranial alternating current stimulation for brain alpha power modulation.

Authors:  Beatrice P De Koninck; Samuel Guay; Hélène Blais; Louis De Beaumont
Journal:  Brain Commun       Date:  2021-02-03

Review 6.  Targeting neural oscillations with transcranial alternating current stimulation.

Authors:  Justin Riddle; Flavio Frohlich
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 3.610

7.  Causal role of cross-frequency coupling in distinct components of cognitive control.

Authors:  Justin Riddle; Amber McFerren; Flavio Frohlich
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 10.885

8.  Transcranial alternating current stimulation entrains alpha oscillations by preferential phase synchronization of fast-spiking cortical neurons to stimulation waveform.

Authors:  Wei A Huang; Iain M Stitt; Ehsan Negahbani; D J Passey; Sangtae Ahn; Marshall Davey; Moritz Dannhauer; Thien T Doan; Anna C Hoover; Angel V Peterchev; Susanne Radtke-Schuller; Flavio Fröhlich
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Facilitated Event-Related Power Modulations during Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) Revealed by Concurrent tACS-MEG.

Authors:  Florian H Kasten; Burkhard Maess; Christoph S Herrmann
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2018-07-25

10.  Individually customized transcranial temporal interference stimulation for focused modulation of deep brain structures: a simulation study with different head models.

Authors:  Sangjun Lee; Chany Lee; Jimin Park; Chang-Hwan Im
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.