Literature DB >> 30816558

Electrophysiology equipment for reliable study of kHz electrical stimulation.

Mohamad FallahRad1, Adantchede Louis Zannou1, Niranjan Khadka1, Steven A Prescott2,3, Stéphanie Ratté2,3, Tianhe Zhang4, Rosana Esteller4, Brad Hershey4, Marom Bikson1.   

Abstract

Characterizing the cellular targets of kHz (1-10 kHz) electrical stimulation remains a pressing topic in neuromodulation because expanding interest in clinical application of kHz stimulation has surpassed mechanistic understanding. The presumed cellular targets of brain stimulation do not respond to kHz frequencies according to conventional electrophysiology theory. Specifically, the low-pass characteristics of cell membranes are predicted to render kHz stimulation inert, especially given the use of limited-duty-cycle biphasic pulses. Precisely because kHz frequencies are considered supra-physiological, conventional instruments designed for neurophysiological studies such as stimulators, amplifiers and recording microelectrodes do not operate reliably at these high rates. Moreover, for pulsed waveforms, the signal frequency content is well above the pulse repetition rate. Thus, the very tools used to characterize the effects of kHz electrical stimulation may themselves be confounding factors. We illustrate custom equipment design that supports reliable electrophysiological recording during kHz-rate stimulation. Given the increased importance of kHz stimulation in clinical domains and compelling possibilities that mechanisms of actions may reflect yet undiscovered neurophysiological phenomena, attention to suitable performance of electrophysiological equipment is pivotal.
© 2019 The Authors. The Journal of Physiology © 2019 The Physiological Society.

Keywords:  Electrophysiology; Kilohertz Stimulation; Microelectrodes; Stimulation Isolators

Year:  2019        PMID: 30816558      PMCID: PMC6462489          DOI: 10.1113/JP277654

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  25 in total

1.  Stimulus artifact removal using a software-based two-stage peak detection algorithm.

Authors:  D T O'Keeffe; G M Lyons; A E Donnelly; C A Byrne
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2001-08-30       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Nerve conduction block utilising high-frequency alternating current.

Authors:  K L Kilgore; N Bhadra
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 3.  Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols.

Authors:  Daniel R Merrill; Marom Bikson; John G R Jefferys
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 4.  Electrical stimulation using kilohertz-frequency alternating current.

Authors:  Alex R Ward
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2008-12-18

5.  Modulation of activity and conduction in single dorsal column axons by kilohertz-frequency spinal cord stimulation.

Authors:  Nathan D Crosby; John J Janik; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Experimental and theoretical characterization of the voltage distribution generated by deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Svjetlana Miocinovic; Scott F Lempka; Gary S Russo; Christopher B Maks; Christopher R Butson; Ken E Sakaie; Jerrold L Vitek; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 5.330

7.  Direct current contamination of kilohertz frequency alternating current waveforms.

Authors:  Manfred Franke; Niloy Bhadra; Narendra Bhadra; Kevin Kilgore
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 2.390

8.  Selective modulation of interhemispheric functional connectivity by HD-tACS shapes perception.

Authors:  Randolph F Helfrich; Hannah Knepper; Guido Nolte; Daniel Strüber; Stefan Rach; Christoph S Herrmann; Till R Schneider; Andreas K Engel
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  High-Frequency (1 kHz) Spinal Cord Stimulation-Is Pulse Shape Crucial for the Efficacy? A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Zhiyang Song; Björn A Meyerson; Bengt Linderoth
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2015-09-06

10.  Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation with Sawtooth Waves: Simultaneous Stimulation and EEG Recording.

Authors:  James Dowsett; Christoph S Herrmann
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  3 in total

1.  Limited Sensitivity of Hippocampal Synaptic Function or Network Oscillations to Unmodulated Kilohertz Electric Fields.

Authors:  Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Mark Jackson; Greg Kronberg; Tianhe Zhang; Rosana Esteller; Brad Hershey; Marom Bikson
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2020-12-16

2.  Quantitative comparisons of block thresholds and onset responses for charge-balanced kilohertz frequency waveforms.

Authors:  Edgar Peña; Nicole A Pelot; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Temporal interference stimulation targets deep brain regions by modulating neural oscillations.

Authors:  Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Greg Kronberg; Davide Reato; Lucas C Parra; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 9.184

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.