Literature DB >> 35884734

Evidence of Neuroplastic Changes after Transcranial Magnetic, Electric, and Deep Brain Stimulation.

Julius Kricheldorff1, Katharina Göke2,3, Maximilian Kiebs2, Florian H Kasten4, Christoph S Herrmann4,5, Karsten Witt1,5, Rene Hurlemann2,5,6.   

Abstract

Electric and magnetic stimulation of the human brain can be used to excite or inhibit neurons. Numerous methods have been designed over the years for this purpose with various advantages and disadvantages that are the topic of this review. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is the most direct and focal application of electric impulses to brain tissue. Electrodes are placed in the brain in order to modulate neural activity and to correct parameters of pathological oscillation in brain circuits such as their amplitude or frequency. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive alternative with the stimulator generating a magnetic field in a coil over the scalp that induces an electric field in the brain which, in turn, interacts with ongoing brain activity. Depending upon stimulation parameters, excitation and inhibition can be achieved. Transcranial electric stimulation (tES) applies electric fields to the scalp that spread along the skull in order to reach the brain, thus, limiting current strength to avoid skin sensations and cranial muscle pain. Therefore, tES can only modulate brain activity and is considered subthreshold, i.e., it does not directly elicit neuronal action potentials. In this review, we collect hints for neuroplastic changes such as modulation of behavior, the electric activity of the brain, or the evolution of clinical signs and symptoms in response to stimulation. Possible mechanisms are discussed, and future paradigms are suggested.

Entities:  

Keywords:  deep brain stimulation (DBS); electroencephalography (EEG); neuroplasticity; transcranial electric stimulation (tES); transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)

Year:  2022        PMID: 35884734      PMCID: PMC9313265          DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12070929

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Sci        ISSN: 2076-3425


  254 in total

1.  Motor cortex excitability following short trains of repetitive magnetic stimuli.

Authors:  N Modugno; Y Nakamura; C D MacKinnon; S R Filipovic; S Bestmann; A Berardelli; J C Rothwell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Long-lasting increase in corticospinal excitability after 1800 pulses of subthreshold 5 Hz repetitive TMS to the primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Alexander Peinemann; Bibiana Reimer; Christian Löer; Angelo Quartarone; Alexander Münchau; Bastian Conrad; Hartwig Roman Siebner
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Entrainment of prefrontal beta oscillations induces an endogenous echo and impairs memory formation.

Authors:  Simon Hanslmayr; Jonas Matuschek; Marie-Christin Fellner
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 4.  Stress and excitatory synapses: from health to disease.

Authors:  W Timmermans; H Xiong; C C Hoogenraad; H J Krugers
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  After-effects of 10 Hz tACS over the prefrontal cortex on phonological word decisions.

Authors:  Vera Moliadze; Leon Sierau; Ekaterina Lyzhko; Tristan Stenner; Michael Werchowski; Michael Siniatchkin; Gesa Hartwigsen
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 8.955

6.  Neuromodulation effects of deep brain stimulation on beta rhythm: A longitudinal local field potential study.

Authors:  Yue Chen; Chen Gong; Ye Tian; Natasza Orlov; Jianguo Zhang; Yi Guo; Shujun Xu; Changqing Jiang; Hongwei Hao; Wolf-Julian Neumann; Andrea A Kühn; Hesheng Liu; Luming Li
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 8.955

7.  Pallidal deep brain stimulation modulates cortical excitability and plasticity.

Authors:  Zhen Ni; Sang Jin Kim; Nicolas Phielipp; Soumya Ghosh; Kaviraja Udupa; Carolyn A Gunraj; Utpal Saha; Mojgan Hodaie; Suneil K Kalia; Andres M Lozano; Darrin J Lee; Elena Moro; Alfonso Fasano; Mark Hallett; Anthony E Lang; Robert Chen
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 10.422

Review 8.  Bilateral deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  M C Rodriguez-Oroz; A Gorospe; J Guridi; E Ramos; G Linazasoro; M Rodriguez-Palmero; J A Obeso
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Subthalamic nucleus stimulation increases brain derived neurotrophic factor in the nigrostriatal system and primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Anne L Spieles-Engemann; Kathy Steece-Collier; Michael M Behbehani; Timothy J Collier; Susan L Wohlgenant; Christopher J Kemp; Allyson Cole-Strauss; Nathan D Levine; Sara E Gombash; Valerie B Thompson; Jack W Lipton; Caryl E Sortwell
Journal:  J Parkinsons Dis       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 5.568

View more
  1 in total

1.  Brain Stimulation and Neuroplasticity-Series II.

Authors:  Ulrich Palm; Samar S Ayache; Moussa A Chalah
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-08-16
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.