Literature DB >> 23478342

Both the cutaneous sensation and phosphene perception are modulated in a frequency-specific manner during transcranial alternating current stimulation.

Zs Turi1, G G Ambrus, K Janacsek, K Emmert, L Hahn, W Paulus, A Antal.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is a non-invasive stimulation technique for shaping neuroplastic processes and possibly entraining ongoing neural oscillations in humans. Despite the growing number of studies using tACS, we know little about the procedural sensations caused by stimulation. In order to fill this gap, we explored the cutaneous sensation and phosphene perception during tACS.
METHODS: Twenty healthy participants took part in a randomized, single-blinded, sham-controlled study, where volunteers received short duration stimulation at 1.0 mA intensity between 2 to 250 Hz using the standard left motor cortex-contralateral supraorbital montage. We recorded the perception onset latency and the strength of the sensations assessed by visual rating scale as dependent variables.
RESULTS: We found that tACS evoked both cutaneous sensation and phosphene perception in a frequency-dependent manner. Our results show that the most perceptible procedural sensations were induced in the beta and gamma frequency range, especially at 20 Hz, whereas minimal procedural sensations were indicated in the ripple range (140 and 250 Hz).
CONCLUSIONS: We believe that our results provide a relevant insight into the procedural sensations caused by oscillatory currents, and will offer a basis for developing more sophisticated stimulation protocols and study designs for future investigations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23478342     DOI: 10.3233/RNN-120297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci        ISSN: 0922-6028            Impact factor:   2.406


  34 in total

Review 1.  Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines.

Authors:  A Antal; I Alekseichuk; M Bikson; J Brockmöller; A R Brunoni; R Chen; L G Cohen; G Dowthwaite; J Ellrich; A Flöel; F Fregni; M S George; R Hamilton; J Haueisen; C S Herrmann; F C Hummel; J P Lefaucheur; D Liebetanz; C K Loo; C D McCaig; C Miniussi; P C Miranda; V Moliadze; M A Nitsche; R Nowak; F Padberg; A Pascual-Leone; W Poppendieck; A Priori; S Rossi; P M Rossini; J Rothwell; M A Rueger; G Ruffini; K Schellhorn; H R Siebner; Y Ugawa; A Wexler; U Ziemann; M Hallett; W Paulus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Transcranial alternating current stimulation entrains single-neuron activity in the primate brain.

Authors:  Matthew R Krause; Pedro G Vieira; Bennett A Csorba; Praveen K Pilly; Christopher C Pack
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Targeting alpha-band oscillations in a cortical model with amplitude-modulated high-frequency transcranial electric stimulation.

Authors:  Ehsan Negahbani; Florian H Kasten; Christoph S Herrmann; Flavio Fröhlich
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation of the Primary Motor Cortex after Skill Acquisition Improves Motor Memory Retention in Humans: A Double-Blinded Sham-Controlled Study.

Authors:  Tomofumi Yamaguchi; Christian Svane; Christian Riis Forman; Mikkel Malling Beck; Svend Sparre Geertsen; Jesper Lundbye-Jensen; Jens Bo Nielsen
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2020-08-06

5.  Functional role of frontal alpha oscillations in creativity.

Authors:  Caroline Lustenberger; Michael R Boyle; A Alban Foulser; Juliann M Mellin; Flavio Fröhlich
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 6.  A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools.

Authors:  A J Woods; A Antal; M Bikson; P S Boggio; A R Brunoni; P Celnik; L G Cohen; F Fregni; C S Herrmann; E S Kappenman; H Knotkova; D Liebetanz; C Miniussi; P C Miranda; W Paulus; A Priori; D Reato; C Stagg; N Wenderoth; M A Nitsche
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Tolerability of Repeated Application of Transcranial Electrical Stimulation with Limited Outputs to Healthy Subjects.

Authors:  Bhaskar Paneri; Devin Adair; Chris Thomas; Niranjan Khadka; Vaishali Patel; William J Tyler; Lucas Parra; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 8.  Guiding transcranial brain stimulation by EEG/MEG to interact with ongoing brain activity and associated functions: A position paper.

Authors:  Gregor Thut; Til Ole Bergmann; Flavio Fröhlich; Surjo R Soekadar; John-Stuart Brittain; Antoni Valero-Cabré; Alexander T Sack; Carlo Miniussi; Andrea Antal; Hartwig Roman Siebner; Ulf Ziemann; Christoph S Herrmann
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-01-29       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Cutaneous sensation of electrical stimulation waveforms.

Authors:  Gavin Hsu; Forouzan Farahani; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 8.955

10.  Addiction history moderates the effect of prefrontal 10-Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation on habitual action selection.

Authors:  Theresa H McKim; Samantha J Dove; Donita L Robinson; Flavio Fröhlich; Charlotte A Boettiger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.