Literature DB >> 29357243

A GPU-Accelerated Parameter Interpolation Thermodynamic Integration Free Energy Method.

Timothy J Giese1, Darrin M York1.   

Abstract

There has been a resurgence of interest in free energy methods motivated by the performance enhancements offered by molecular dynamics (MD) software written for specialized hardware, such as graphics processing units (GPUs). In this work, we exploit the properties of a parameter-interpolated thermodynamic integration (PI-TI) method to connect states by their molecular mechanical (MM) parameter values. This pathway is shown to be better behaved for Mg2+Ca2+ transformations than traditional linear alchemical pathways (with and without soft-core potentials). The PI-TI method has the practical advantage that no modification of the MD code is required to propagate the dynamics, and unlike with linear alchemical mixing, only one electrostatic evaluation is needed (e.g., single call to particle-mesh Ewald) leading to better performance. In the case of AMBER, this enables all the performance benefits of GPU-acceleration to be realized, in addition to unlocking the full spectrum of features available within the MD software, such as Hamiltonian replica exchange (HREM). The TI derivative evaluation can be accomplished efficiently in a post-processing step by reanalyzing the statistically independent trajectory frames in parallel for high throughput. We also show how one can evaluate the particle mesh Ewald contribution to the TI derivative evaluation without needing to perform two reciprocal space calculations. We apply the PI-TI method with HREM on GPUs in AMBER to predict p Ka values in double stranded RNA molecules and make comparison with experiments. Convergence to under 0.25 units for these systems required 100 ns or more of sampling per window and coupling of windows with HREM. We find that MM charges derived from ab initio QM/MM fragment calculations improve the agreement between calculation and experimental results.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 29357243      PMCID: PMC5849537          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b01175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  80 in total

1.  Ion solvation thermodynamics from simulation with a polarizable force field.

Authors:  Alan Grossfield; Pengyu Ren; Jay W Ponder
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2003-12-17       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  Equilibrium free energies from nonequilibrium measurements using maximum-likelihood methods.

Authors:  Michael R Shirts; Eric Bair; Giles Hooker; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2003-10-02       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  Soft-core potentials in thermodynamic integration: comparing one- and two-step transformations.

Authors:  Thomas Steinbrecher; InSuk Joung; David A Case
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  The GROMOS software for biomolecular simulation: GROMOS05.

Authors:  Markus Christen; Philippe H Hünenberger; Dirk Bakowies; Riccardo Baron; Roland Bürgi; Daan P Geerke; Tim N Heinz; Mika A Kastenholz; Vincent Kräutler; Chris Oostenbrink; Christine Peter; Daniel Trzesniak; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 5.  Molecular modeling of organic and biomolecular systems using BOSS and MCPRO.

Authors:  William L Jorgensen; Julian Tirado-Rives
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.376

6.  Computation of methodology-independent ionic solvation free energies from molecular simulations. II. The hydration free energy of the sodium cation.

Authors:  Mika A Kastenholz; Philippe H Hünenberger
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2006-06-14       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Beyond Born-Mayer: Improved Models for Short-Range Repulsion in ab Initio Force Fields.

Authors:  Mary J Van Vleet; Alston J Misquitta; Anthony J Stone; J R Schmidt
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  Sites and thermodynamic quantities associated with proton and metal ion interaction with ribonucleic acid, deoxyribonucleic acid, and their constituent bases, nucleosides, and nucleotides.

Authors:  R M Izatt; J J Christensen; J H Rytting
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  1971-10       Impact factor: 60.622

9.  pKa shifting in double-stranded RNA is highly dependent upon nearest neighbors and bulge positioning.

Authors:  Jennifer L Wilcox; Philip C Bevilacqua
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Identifying ligand binding sites and poses using GPU-accelerated Hamiltonian replica exchange molecular dynamics.

Authors:  Kai Wang; John D Chodera; Yanzhi Yang; Michael R Shirts
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.686

View more
  13 in total

1.  Cleaning Up Mechanistic Debris Generated by Twister Ribozymes Using Computational RNA Enzymology.

Authors:  Colin S Gaines; Timothy J Giese; Darrin M York
Journal:  ACS Catal       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 13.084

2.  GPU-Accelerated Molecular Dynamics and Free Energy Methods in Amber18: Performance Enhancements and New Features.

Authors:  Tai-Sung Lee; David S Cerutti; Dan Mermelstein; Charles Lin; Scott LeGrand; Timothy J Giese; Adrian Roitberg; David A Case; Ross C Walker; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 4.956

3.  Alchemical Binding Free Energy Calculations in AMBER20: Advances and Best Practices for Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Tai-Sung Lee; Bryce K Allen; Timothy J Giese; Zhenyu Guo; Pengfei Li; Charles Lin; T Dwight McGee; David A Pearlman; Brian K Radak; Yujun Tao; Hsu-Chun Tsai; Huafeng Xu; Woody Sherman; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  Validation of Free Energy Methods in AMBER.

Authors:  Hsu-Chun Tsai; Yujun Tao; Tai-Sung Lee; Kenneth M Merz; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Computing Relative Binding Affinity of Ligands to Receptor: An Effective Hybrid Single-Dual-Topology Free-Energy Perturbation Approach in NAMD.

Authors:  Wei Jiang; Christophe Chipot; Benoît Roux
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Modified Hamiltonian in FEP Calculations for Reducing the Computational Cost of Electrostatic Interactions.

Authors:  Hiraku Oshima; Yuji Sugita
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 6.162

7.  Development of a Robust Indirect Approach for MM → QM Free Energy Calculations That Combines Force-Matched Reference Potential and Bennett's Acceptance Ratio Methods.

Authors:  Timothy J Giese; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  Force matching as a stepping stone to QM/MM CB[8] host/guest binding free energies: a SAMPL6 cautionary tale.

Authors:  Phillip S Hudson; Kyungreem Han; H Lee Woodcock; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Estimating the Roles of Protonation and Electronic Polarization in Absolute Binding Affinity Simulations.

Authors:  Edward King; Ruxi Qi; Han Li; Ray Luo; Erick Aitchison
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 6.006

10.  Variational Method for Networkwide Analysis of Relative Ligand Binding Free Energies with Loop Closure and Experimental Constraints.

Authors:  Timothy J Giese; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 6.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.