Literature DB >> 16784292

Computation of methodology-independent ionic solvation free energies from molecular simulations. II. The hydration free energy of the sodium cation.

Mika A Kastenholz1, Philippe H Hünenberger.   

Abstract

The raw ionic solvation free energies computed from atomistic (explicit-solvent) simulations are extremely sensitive to the boundary conditions (finite or periodic system, system shape, and size) and treatment of electrostatic interactions (Coulombic, lattice sum, or cutoff based) used during these simulations. In the present article, it is shown that correction terms can be derived for the effect of (A) an incorrect solvent polarization around the ion due to the use of an approximate (not strictly Coulombic) electrostatic scheme; (B) the finite size or artificial periodicity of the simulated system; (C) an improper summation scheme to evaluate the potential at the ion site and the possible presence of a liquid-vacuum interface in the simulated system. Taking the hydration free energy of the sodium cation as a test case, it is shown that the raw solvation free energies obtained using seven different types of boundary conditions and electrostatic schemes commonly used in explicit-solvent simulations (for a total of 72 simulations differing in the corresponding simulation parameters) can be corrected so as to obtain a consistent value for this quantity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16784292     DOI: 10.1063/1.2201698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  51 in total

Review 1.  Prediction of protein-ligand binding affinity by free energy simulations: assumptions, pitfalls and expectations.

Authors:  Julien Michel; Jonathan W Essex
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Mapping the importance of four factors in creating monovalent ion selectivity in biological molecules.

Authors:  Michael Thomas; Dylan Jayatilaka; Ben Corry
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Copper Oxidation/Reduction in Water and Protein: Studies with DFTB3/MM and VALBOND Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Authors:  Haiyun Jin; Puja Goyal; Akshaya Kumar Das; Michael Gaus; Markus Meuwly; Qiang Cui
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  Pairwise-additive force fields for selected aqueous monovalent ions from adaptive force matching.

Authors:  Jicun Li; Feng Wang
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  On the relative stabilities of the alkali cations 222 cryptates in the gas phase and in water-methanol solution.

Authors:  Elisa S Leite; Sidney R Santana; Philippe H Hünenberger; Luiz C G Freitas; Ricardo L Longo
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2007-07-14       Impact factor: 1.810

6.  Removing systematic errors in interionic potentials of mean force computed in molecular simulations using reaction-field-based electrostatics.

Authors:  Andrij Baumketner
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Calculating the binding free energies of charged species based on explicit-solvent simulations employing lattice-sum methods: an accurate correction scheme for electrostatic finite-size effects.

Authors:  Gabriel J Rocklin; David L Mobley; Ken A Dill; Philippe H Hünenberger
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Lead optimization mapper: automating free energy calculations for lead optimization.

Authors:  Shuai Liu; Yujie Wu; Teng Lin; Robert Abel; Jonathan P Redmann; Christopher M Summa; Vivian R Jaber; Nathan M Lim; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Polarizable Force Field for Molecular Ions Based on the Classical Drude Oscillator.

Authors:  Fang-Yu Lin; Pedro E M Lopes; Edward Harder; Benoît Roux; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 4.956

10.  QM/MM free energy simulations: recent progress and challenges.

Authors:  Xiya Lu; Dong Fang; Shingo Ito; Yuko Okamoto; Victor Ovchinnikov; Qiang Cui
Journal:  Mol Simul       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 2.178

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.