Literature DB >> 33764050

Estimating the Roles of Protonation and Electronic Polarization in Absolute Binding Affinity Simulations.

Edward King, Ruxi Qi1, Han Li, Ray Luo, Erick Aitchison.   

Abstract

Accurate prediction of binding free energies is critical to streamlining the drug development and protein design process. With the advent of GPU acceleration, absolute alchemical methods, which simulate the removal of ligand electrostatics and van der Waals interactions with the protein, have become routinely accessible and provide a physically rigorous approach that enables full consideration of flexibility and solvent interaction. However, standard explicit solvent simulations are unable to model protonation or electronic polarization changes upon ligand transfer from water to the protein interior, leading to inaccurate prediction of binding affinities for charged molecules. Here, we perform extensive simulation totaling ∼540 μs to benchmark the impact of modeling conditions on predictive accuracy for absolute alchemical simulations. Binding to urokinase plasminogen activator (UPA), a protein frequently overexpressed in metastatic tumors, is evaluated for a set of 10 inhibitors with extended flexibility, highly charged character, and titratable properties. We demonstrate that the alchemical simulations can be adapted to utilize the MBAR/PBSA method to improve the accuracy upon incorporating electronic polarization, highlighting the importance of polarization in alchemical simulations of binding affinities. Comparison of binding energy prediction at various protonation states indicates that proper electrostatic setup is also crucial in binding affinity prediction of charged systems, prompting us to propose an alternative binding mode with protonated ligand phenol and Hid-46 at the binding site, a testable hypothesis for future experimental validation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33764050      PMCID: PMC8254375          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  108 in total

1.  Ligand-receptor docking with the Mining Minima optimizer.

Authors:  L David; R Luo; M K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Free energy calculations for theophylline binding to an RNA aptamer: Comparison of MM-PBSA and thermodynamic integration methods.

Authors:  Hiroaki Gouda; Irwin D Kuntz; David A Case; Peter A Kollman
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.505

3.  Routine Microsecond Molecular Dynamics Simulations with AMBER on GPUs. 2. Explicit Solvent Particle Mesh Ewald.

Authors:  Romelia Salomon-Ferrer; Andreas W Götz; Duncan Poole; Scott Le Grand; Ross C Walker
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 6.006

4.  Ligand configurational entropy and protein binding.

Authors:  Chia-en A Chang; Wei Chen; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Balancing solvation and intramolecular interactions: toward a consistent generalized Born force field.

Authors:  Jianhan Chen; Wonpil Im; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 6.  Theory of electrostatic interactions in macromolecules.

Authors:  M K Gilson
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 7.  Electrostatic effects in macromolecules: fundamental concepts and practical modeling.

Authors:  A Warshel; A Papazyan
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 6.809

8.  Guidelines for the analysis of free energy calculations.

Authors:  Pavel V Klimovich; Michael R Shirts; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Modeling Polarization in Proteins and Protein-ligand Complexes: Methods and Preliminary Results.

Authors:  Richard A Friesner
Journal:  Adv Protein Chem       Date:  2005

10.  Calculating protein-ligand binding affinities with MMPBSA: Method and error analysis.

Authors:  Changhao Wang; Peter H Nguyen; Kevin Pham; Danielle Huynh; Thanh-Binh Nancy Le; Hongli Wang; Pengyu Ren; Ray Luo
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.376

View more
  1 in total

1.  Identifying the Hot Spot Residues of the SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease Using MM-PBSA and Multiple Force Fields.

Authors:  Jinyoung Byun; Juyong Lee
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-31
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.