The side chain of Q295 of glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase from human liver ( hlGPDH) lies in a flexible loop, that folds over the phosphodianion of substrate dihydroxyacetone phosphate (DHAP). Q295 interacts with the side-chain cation from R269, which is ion-paired to the substrate phosphodianion. Kinetic parameters kcat/ Km (M-1 s-1) and kcat/ KGA KHPi (M-2 s-1) were determined, respectively, for catalysis of the reduction of DHAP and for dianion activation of catalysis of reduction of glycolaldehyde (GA) catalyzed by wild-type, Q295G, Q295S, Q295A, and Q295N mutants of hlGPDH. These mutations result in up to a 150-fold decrease in ( kcat/ Km)DHAP and up to a 2.7 kcal/mol decrease in the intrinsic phosphodianion binding energy. The data define a linear correlation with slope 1.1, between the intrinsic phosphodianion binding energy and the intrinsic phosphite dianion binding energy for activation of hlGPDH-catalyzed reduction of GA, that demonstrates a role for Q295 in optimizing this dianion binding energy. The R269A mutation of wild-type GPDH results in a 9.1 kcal/mol destabilization of the transition state for reduction of DHAP, but the same R269A mutation of N270A and Q295A mutants result in smaller 5.9 and 4.9 kcal/mol transition-state destabilization. Similarly, the N270A or Q295A mutations of R269A GPDH each result in large falloffs in the efficiency of rescue of the R269A mutant by guanidine cation. We conclude that N270, which interacts for the substrate phosphodianion and Q295, which interacts with the guanidine side chain of R269, function to optimize the apparent transition-state stabilization provided by the cationic side chain of R269.
The side chain of Q295 of glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase from human liver ( hlGPDH) lies in a flexible loop, that folds over the phosphodianion of substrate dihydroxyacetone phosphate (DHAP). Q295 interacts with the side-chain cation from R269, which is ion-paired to the substrate phosphodianion. Kinetic parameters kcat/ Km (M-1 s-1) and kcat/ KGA KHPi (M-2 s-1) were determined, respectively, for catalysis of the reduction of DHAP and for dianion activation of catalysis of reduction of glycolaldehyde (GA) catalyzed by wild-type, Q295G, Q295S, Q295A, and Q295N mutants of hlGPDH. These mutations result in up to a 150-fold decrease in ( kcat/ Km)DHAP and up to a 2.7 kcal/mol decrease in the intrinsic phosphodianion binding energy. The data define a linear correlation with slope 1.1, between the intrinsic phosphodianion binding energy and the intrinsic phosphite dianion binding energy for activation of hlGPDH-catalyzed reduction of GA, that demonstrates a role for Q295 in optimizing this dianion binding energy. The R269A mutation of wild-type GPDH results in a 9.1 kcal/mol destabilization of the transition state for reduction of DHAP, but the same R269A mutation of N270A and Q295A mutants result in smaller 5.9 and 4.9 kcal/mol transition-state destabilization. Similarly, the N270A or Q295A mutations of R269A GPDH each result in large falloffs in the efficiency of rescue of the R269A mutant by guanidine cation. We conclude that N270, which interacts for the substrate phosphodianion and Q295, which interacts with the guanidine side chain of R269, function to optimize the apparent transition-state stabilization provided by the cationic side chain of R269.
We are examining the proposition
that a consideration of transition-state stabilization is sufficient to account for the
rate acceleration of many or most enzymatic reactions.[1−4] The transition states for the decarboxylation catalyzed by orotidine
5′-monophosphate decarboxylase (OMPDC),[5] the proton transfer catalyzed by triosephosphate isomerase (TIM),[6−8] and the hydride transfer catalyzed by glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
(GPDH, Scheme A)[9] are each stabilized by 11–12 kcal/mol
by interactions between the protein and the substrate dianion (Scheme B). This is the intrinsic
phosphodianion binding energy (IBE) that is utilized for catalysis
of these reactions.[3] From 4 to 6 kcal/mol
of this IBE is expressed in the reaction ground state, where it serves
to anchor the substrate to the protein catalyst.[10] In the absence of the anchoring covalent connection between
the dianion and substrate, from 6 to 8 kcal/mol of the dianion IBE
is expressed as stabilization of the transition state for enzyme-catalyzed
reactions of a truncated substrate by 1.0 M phosphite dianion (Scheme B).[10] Similar results have been obtained in studies on the mechanism
of action of β-phosphoglucomutase[11] and 1-deoxy-d-xylulose-5-phosphate reductoisomerase.[12]
Scheme 1
The observation of phosphitedianion activation of GPDH, OMPDC,
and TIM for catalysis of the reactions of their respective truncated
substrates shows that the active sites of these enzymes may be separated
into a catalytic domain, which operates chemically on the bound truncated
substrate, and a phosphodianion activation domain, where dianion binding
interactions are utilized to promote chemistry at the catalytic domain.[2,10] GPDH, OMPDC, and TIM are each activated by binding of a range of
oxydianions [HPO32–, FPO32–, S2O32–,
SO42–, and HOPO32–] to the respective dianion activation sites.[13]We are working to characterize the dianion activation
sites of
TIM, OMPDC, and GPDH from human liver (hlGPDH) and
to determine the common architectural features of these sites that
enable dianion activation of the enzymes that catalyze a chemically
diverse set or reactions. Dianion activation of TIM and OMPDC has
been linked to enzyme conformational changes that are highlighted
by closure of flexible loops over the phosphodianion of enzyme-bound
substrate.[14−19] The results of recent mutagenesis studies on OMPDC and TIM have
provided considerable insight into the mechanism for activation of
these enzymes by dianion driven loop closure.Figure shows
the
unliganded form of hlGPDH and the closed ternary hlGPDH·NAD·DHAP complex.[10] The flexible loop [292-LNGQKL-297] that closes over the phosphodianion
of DHAP at the ternary complex is shaded blue, and the side chain
of R269 is shaded red. This cationic side chain acts to bridge the
flexible enzyme loop to the substrate, through interactions with the
loop amide side chain of Q295 and the phosphodianion of DHAP, which
is shaded green. Closure of the flexible loop over the surface of hlGPDH locks DHAP in a protein cage,[18,22] where the carbonyl group shows a high reactivity toward reduction
by NADH.
Figure 1
Representations, from X-ray crystal structures, of the surface
of the open and closed forms of hlGPDH. (A) The open
form of the unliganded enzyme (PDB entry 1X0V). (B) The closed form of the nonproductive
E·NAD·DHAP ternary complex (PDB entry 1WPQ). In each the flexible
loop [292-LNGQKL-297] is shaded blue, and the guanidine side chain
of R269 is shaded red. The closed structure shows the phosphodianion
at the surface of the protein shaded green and the cofactor shaded
cyan.
Representations, from X-ray crystal structures, of the surface
of the open and closed forms of hlGPDH. (A) The open
form of the unliganded enzyme (PDB entry 1X0V). (B) The closed form of the nonproductive
E·NAD·DHAP ternary complex (PDB entry 1WPQ). In each the flexible
loop [292-LNGQKL-297] is shaded blue, and the guanidine side chain
of R269 is shaded red. The closed structure shows the phosphodianion
at the surface of the protein shaded green and the cofactor shaded
cyan.We have proposed that the flexible
“capping” loop
(Figure ) plays an
important role in the activation of hlGPDH for catalysis,
similar to that for the flexible loops at TIM and OMPDC.[13,23] This proposal leads to the prediction that the amide side chain
from Q295 plays a critical role in ensuring optimal enzyme activation
by dianions. We report here the results of studies of the effect of
site-directed mutations of Q295 on hlGPDH-catalyzed
reactions of the whole substrate DHAP, of the substrate in pieces,[13] and of the enzyme in pieces,[23] which establish a role for the amide side chain of Q295
in optimizing the activating interactions between hlGPDH and the enzyme-bound dianions. We report additional results
of the effect of R269A and N270A mutations on enzyme activity. These
results are consistent with a high degree of cooperativity in the
enzyme conformational change, which organizes the catalytic side chains
at the enzyme active site.
Experimental Section
Materials
Water
was purified using Milli-Q Academic
purification system. Q-Sepharose and Sephacryl S-200 were purchased
from GE Healthcare. Dowex 50WX4-200R (H+ form), nicotinamide
adenine dinucleotide reduced (NADH, disodiumsalt), dihydroxyacetone
phosphatehemimagnesium salt, glycolaldehyde dimer, 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid sodium salt (MES, ≥99.5%),
triethanolamine hydrochloride (TEA, ≥99.5%), ampicillin, kanamycin
sulfate, and d,l-dithiothreitol (DTT) were purchased
from Sigma-Aldrich. Protease inhibitor tablets (Complete brand) and
bovine serum albumin, fraction V (BSA), were purchased from Roche.
Ammonium sulfate (enzyme grade), guanidinium hydrochloride (electrophoresis
grade, min. 99%), sodium hydroxide (1.0 N), and hydrochloric acid
(1.0 N) were purchased from Fisher. Sodium phosphite (dibasic, pentahydrate)
was purchased from Fluka, and its water content was reduced to Na2HPO3·0.4H2O as previously described.[7] Quikchange II Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kits
were purchased from Agilent Technologies, and λDE3 Lysogenization
Kits were purchased from Novagen. All other chemicals were reagent
grade or better and were used without further purification.
Preparation
of Solutions
Solution pH was determined
at 25 °C using an Orion model 720A pH meter equipped with a Radiometer
pHC4006-9 combination electrode that was standardized at pH 4.00,
7.00, and 10.00 at 25 °C. Stock solutions of NADH, prepared by
dissolving the disodium form of the coenzyme in water, were stored
at 4 °C. The concentration of NADH in aqueous solutions was determined
from the absorbance at 340 nm using a value of ε = 6220 M–1 cm–1. Stock solutions of DHAP were
prepared, starting with the hemimagnesium salt, and stirring over
Dowex 50WX4-200R (H+ form) in water for 5–10 min
at 25 °C to give the free acid. The Dowex was removed by filtration,
the pH of the resulting solution was adjusted from ∼2.0 to
7.5 using 1 M NaOH, and the solution was then stored at −20
°C. The concentration of DHAP was determined spectrophotometrically
at 340 nm, as the concentration of NADH oxidized upon quantitative
conversion to glycerol-3-phosphate catalyzed by hlGPDH.Stock solutions of glycolaldehyde dimer (200 mM monomer)
were prepared by dissolving the dimer in water and waiting for 3 days
at room temperature to allow for quantitative breakdown of the dimer
to the monomer.[7] Stock solutions of sodium
phosphite were prepared by dissolving the salt in water and adjusting
the pH to 7.5 with 1 M HCl. At pH 7.5, the dianion:monoanion ratio
for sodium phosphite was 93:7. Stock solutions of guanidinium hydrochloride
were prepared by dissolving the salt in water and adjusting the pH
to 7.5 with 1 M HCl. MES and TEA buffers were prepared by addition
of 1 M NaOH or 1 M HCl and solid NaCl to give the desired pH and final
ionic strength. Stock solutions of Q295 mutant hlGPDH (10–20 mg/mL) were dialyzed exhaustively against 20 mM
TEA buffer at 4 °C. Dilutions of the mutant enzymes were then
prepared in 20 mM TEA buffer (pH 7.5) that contains 10 mM DTT and
0.1 mg/mL BSA. The enzyme concentration was determined from the absorbance
at 280 nm using the extinction coefficient of 18 450 M–1cm–1 and a subunit molecular mass
of 37 500 Da.[24−26]
Cloning and Site-Directed Mutagenesis of
Human Liver Glycerol-3-phosphate
Dehydrogenase
The plasmid pDNR-dual donor vector containing
the gene for wild-type hlGPDH gene insert was purchased
from the Harvard plasmid repository. The insert gene was subcloned
into a bacterial expression vector pET-15b from Novagen and used for
mutagenesis. Site-directed mutagenesis on pET-15b to introduce the
mutations was carried out using the Quickchange II kit from Stratagene.
The primers used to introduce base changes encoding Q295A, Q295G,
Q295S, and Q295N mutations differ from the sequence for the wild-type
gene as follows:wild-type: 5′-GAAAGAGTTGCTGAATGGGQ295A: 5′-GAAAGAGTTGCTGAATGGGQ295G: 5′-GAAAGAGTTGCTGAATGGGQ295S: 5′-GAAAGAGTTGCTGAATGGGQ295N: 5′-GAAAGAGTTGCTGAATGGGThe Q295 mutants were constructed individually
starting
with 20 ng of plasmid pET-15b containing the gene for wild-type hlGPDH that had been purified from Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) cells. This plasmid was added to a PCR mixture containing
5 μL of 10X Pfu Ultra Buffer, 125 ng each of
the forward and reverse mutagenesis primers, 1 μL of 10 mM dNTP
mixture, 2.5 units of Pfu Ultra HF DNA polymerase,
and water to give a final volume of 50 μL. The parameters for
PCR were 45 s at 95 °C followed by 17 cycles of 45 s at 95 °C,
90 s at 55 °C, and 10 min at 68 °C. The R269A and R269A/N270A
mutations were performed by following published procedures.[23] The R269A/Q295A mutant was constructed by following
the same procedure, except that DNA from the R269A mutant plasmid
was used as the template. In both cases, 20 units of the DpnI restriction enzyme was added to the product of the PCR reaction,
and the solutions were incubated at 37 °C for 1 h to degrade
the methylated template DNA. One microliter of each reaction mixture
was transformed into E. coli DH5α cells, and
in each case a single colony was used for mutant plasmid purification.
In each case, the presence of the mutant sequence at the plasmid DNA
was verified by sequencing at the Roswell Park Cancer Institute DNA
Sequencing Facility.
Expression and Purification of Mutants of
Glycerol-3-phosphate
Dehydrogenase
The procedures for the preparation of the R269A[23] and R269A/N270A[27] mutant enzymes were described in earlier work. The GPDH-deficient
glpD1 strain from the E. coli Keio collection was
purchased from the Coli Genetic Stock Center at Yale University. Lysogenization
of this strain was carried out using a λDE3 lysogenization kit
from Novagen. The plasmids coding for single Q295 mutants and the
R269A/Q295A double mutant of hlGPDH were transformed
separately into freshly lysogenized competent E. coli glpD1 (DE3) cells. The cells containing the mutant plasmid were
grown overnight in 200–300 mL of LB medium that contained 100
μg/mL ampicillin and 50 μg/mL kanamycin at 37 °C.
This culture was diluted into 5 L of LB medium (100 μg/mL ampicillin
and 50 μg/mL kanamycin), and grown at 37 °C to OD600 = 0.6, at which point 0.6 mM isopropyl-1-thio-d-galactoside
was added to the culture and the temperature adjusted to 19 °C
to induce protein expression. After 12 h of overexpression, the cells
were harvested and stored in 20 mL of 25 mM MES buffer that contains
150 mM NaCl at pH 6.8.The cell pellets were suspended in 25
mM MES at pH 6.8 in the presence of protease inhibitors (Complete
brand) and lysed using a French press. The lysates were diluted to
40 mL with the same buffer and centrifuged at 18000g for 60 min. The resulting lysates were subject to fractional precipitation
by ammonium sulfate. The mutant enzymes precipitated in the following
fraction, where 100% is a saturated solution of ammonium sulfate:
0–40%, Q295S; 30–40%, Q295G and Q295N; and 40–50%,
Q295A and R269A/Q295A. After 20 min the mixtures were centrifuged
at 23000g for 20 min, and the resulting pellets were
redissolved in 25 mL of 25 mM MES buffer at pH 6.8. The protein solutions
were dialyzed overnight against 25 mM MES buffer pH 6.8 at 4 °C.
The resulting dialysate was loaded onto a Q-Sepharose ion-exchange
column previously equilibrated against 25 mM MES pH 6.8 that contains
30 mM NaCl. The column was eluted with 1.0 L of a linear 30–90
mM gradient of NaCl in the same buffer. The protein concentration
of each column fraction was determined from the UV absorbance at 280
nm, using the extinction coefficient of 18 450 M–1cm–1. The fractions that contained the mutant
protein were pooled, concentrated, and further purified over a Sephacryl
S-200 column, equilibrated with 25 mM MES pH 6.8 that contains 120
mM NaCl, eluting with the same saline buffer solution. Fractions with A280 > 1 were pooled, concentrated, and stored
at −80 °C in 20% glycerol, 25 mM MES buffer at pH 6.8,
and 100 mM NaCl. The Q295 mutants of hlGPDH obtained
by this procedure were judged to be homogeneous by SDS-PAGE electrophoresis.
The following are the final yields of the Q295 mutants of hlGPDH purified from a 5 L bacterial culture: 120 mg, Q295A;
90 mg, Q295G; 140 mg, Q295S; 130 mg, Q295N; and 40 mg, R269A/Q295A.
Mutant hlGPDH-Catalyzed Reduction of DHAP by
NADH
The reduction of DHAP catalyzed by Q295 mutants of hlGPDH was assayed in solutions that contain 20 mM TEA buffer
(pH 7.5), 0.1 mg/mL BSA, 100 or 200 μM NADH, 0.04–15
mM DHAP at I = 0.12 (NaCl), and the following enzyme
concentrations: 4.4 nM, Q295A; 2.6 nM, Q295G; 3.9 nM, Q295S; 4.6 nM,
Q295N; and 20 μM, R269A/Q295A. Initial velocities for each assay
were determined over a 5–10 min reaction time.Assay
mixtures for the R269A/N270A and R269A/Q295A mutant hlGPDH-catalyzed reduction of DHAP by NADH in the presence of guanidinium
cation contained 20 mM TEA buffer (pH 7.5), 0.1 mg/mL BSA, 200 μM
NADH, 0.5–5 mM DHAP, 10–80 mM guanidinium hydrochloride
at I = 0.12 (NaCl) with the following mutant enzyme
concentrations: 20 μM R269A/N270A; and 0.8 μM, R269A/Q295A.
The change in absorbance at 340 nm was monitored, and the initial
velocities for reactions catalyzed by R269A/Q295A and R269A/N270A
mutants were determined over 5–10 and 5–50 min reaction
times, respectively. The kinetic parameter Km for the hlGPDH-catalyzed reactions of DHAP
was determined for the reactive form of DHAP, which is present as
55% of total DHAP.[28]
Mutant hlGPDH-Catalyzed Reduction of Glycolaldehyde
by NADH
The reduction of GA catalyzed by Q295 mutants of hlGPDH was assayed in solutions that contain 10 mM TEA buffer
(pH 7.5), 5–60 mM GA, 200 μM NADH, 0–30 mM phosphitedianion at I = 0.12 (NaCl) with the following enzyme
concentrations: 14 μM, Q295A; 3 μM, Q295G and Q295S; 30
μM, Q295N; and 60 μM, R269A/Q295A. Initial velocities
for the mutant hlGPDH-catalyzed reduction of GA by
NADH were determined over 5–60 min reaction times.The
reduction of GA catalyzed by R269A, R269A/N270A, and R269A/Q295A mutants
of hlGPDH was assayed in solutions that contain 10
mM TEA buffer (pH 7.5), 60 mM GA, 200 μM NADH at I = 0.12 (NaCl) with the following mutant enzyme concentrations: 20
μM, R269A hlGPDH; 40 μM, R269A/N270A;
and 60 μM R269A/Q295A. The change in absorbance at 340 nm was
monitored over a period of 60 min (ΔA340 ≈ 0.010) and compared with the change in absorbance for control
reactions that contain no enzyme (ΔA340 ≤ 0.010). Upper limits for kcat/Km for the mutant hlGPDH-catalyzed reduction of GA by NADH were calculated for hlGPDH-catalyzed reduction of the carbonyl form of substrate
(fcar = 0.06),[7] with the assumption that ΔA340 ≤ 0.005 from this enzyme-catalyzed reaction.
Results
GPDH follows an ordered reaction mechanism with NADH (Kd = 7 μM)[29] binding first,
followed by DHAP.[30] Mutations of R269,
N270, and Q295 near the dianion binding site of DHAP are not expected
to affect the binding of NADH at a distant site.[10] This is consistent with the observation that the Michaelis–Menten
plots of initial velocity data for wild-type, R269A, and N270A hlGPDH-catalyzed reduction of DHAP in the presence of 0.10
and 0.20 mM reducing agent NADH show a good fit to a single set of
kinetic parameters kcat and Km.[13,27]The Q295A and R269A/Q269A mutants of hlGPDH were prepared
by standard methods,[23,27] and their activity at 25 °C,
pH 7.5 (20 mM TEA buffer), and I = 0.12 (NaCl) was
determined by monitoring the reduction of DHAP by NADH. Figure A shows Michaelis–Menten plots of v/[E] against [DHAP] for reduction
of DHAP by NADH (200 μM) catalyzed by Q295G, Q295S, Q295A, and
Q295N mutants of hlGPDH (Scheme A). Figure B shows the Michaelis–Menten plot for reduction
of DHAP by NADH (200 μM) catalyzed by R269A/Q295A hlGPDH. The rate data for Q295 mutants determined for reactions at
0.10 and 0.20 mM NADH show a good fit to the single set of kinetic
parameters kcat and Km. The kinetic parameters obtained from nonlinear least-squares
fits of data for reactions at 0.10 and 0.20 mM NADH to the Michaelis–Menten
equation are reported in Table . Table also
reports kinetic parameters for N270A and R269A/N270A mutants of hlGPDH determined in earlier work.[27]
Figure 2
Michaelis–Menten
plots of v/[E] for reduction
of DHAP by NADH (0.2 mM) catalyzed by Q295 mutants of hlGPDH at 25 °C, pH 7.5 (20 mM TEA buffer), and I = 0.12 (NaCl). (A) ▼, Q295G mutant; ◆, Q295S; ●,
Q295A; and ▲, Q295N. (B) R269A/Q295A mutant.
Table 1
Kinetic Parameters
for Wild-Type and
Mutant hlGPDH-Catalyzed Reduction of Whole Substrate
DHAP and Truncated Substrate Glycolaldehyde by NADH at pH 7.5 and I = 0.12
kcata
Kma
kcat/Kma
(kcat/Km)Eb
intrinsic dianion binding energy c
enzyme
(s–1)
(M)
(M–1 s–1)
(M–1 s–1)
(kcal mol–1)
WTd
240 ± 10
(5.2 ± 0.3) × 10–5
(4.6 ± 0.3) × 106
(5.0 ± 0.6) × 10–2
–10.8
R269Ae
(5.9 ± 0.4) × 10–3
(5.7 ± 0.5) × 10–3
1.0 ± 0.15
≤0.003
Q295G
115 ± 5
(1.5 ± 0.2) × 10–4
(7.5 ± 1.0) × 105
(1.9 ± 0.2) × 10–2
–10.4
Q295S
92 ± 6
(1.7 ± 0.2) × 10–4
(5.4 ± 0.7) × 105
(1.7 ± 0.1) × 10–2
–10.2
Q295A
100 ± 10
(1.6 ± 0.2) × 10–3
(6.3 ± 1.0) × 104
(1.4 ± 0.1) × 10–2
–9.1
Q295N
60 ± 3
(2.0 ± 0.3) × 10–3
(3.0 ± 0.5) × 104
(3.3 ± 0.3) × 10–2
–8.1
R269A/Q295A
(3.7 ± 0.2) × 10–3
(4.9 ± 0.7) × 10–4
7.5 ± 0.2
≤0.003
N270Af
9.0 ± 0.5
(2.5 ± 0.2) × 10–2
360 ± 35
2.0 ± 0.2
R269A/N270Af
(2.8 ± 0.1) × 10–4
(1.5 ± 0.1) × 10–2
(1.7 ± 0.1) × 10–2
≤0.003
Kinetic parameters determined from
the fit of the data to the Michaelis–Menten equation. The quoted
errors are the average of the values determined from at least two
sets of data for hlGPDH-catalyzed reduction of DHAP
by 0.10 and 0.20 mM NADH (Figure ).
Kinetic
parameters for GPDH-catalyzed
reduction of GA by 0.2 mM NADH determined from the fit of data to eq .
The energetic contribution of the
phosphodianion to stabilization of the transition state for GPDH-catalyzed
reduction of DHAP by NADH calculated from the data in this table using eq .[3,10]
Ref (13).
Ref (23).
Ref (27)
Michaelis–Menten
plots of v/[E] for reduction
of DHAP by NADH (0.2 mM) catalyzed by Q295 mutants of hlGPDH at 25 °C, pH 7.5 (20 mM TEA buffer), and I = 0.12 (NaCl). (A) ▼, Q295G mutant; ◆, Q295S; ●,
Q295A; and ▲, Q295N. (B) R269A/Q295A mutant.Kinetic parameters determined from
the fit of the data to the Michaelis–Menten equation. The quoted
errors are the average of the values determined from at least two
sets of data for hlGPDH-catalyzed reduction of DHAP
by 0.10 and 0.20 mM NADH (Figure ).Kinetic
parameters for GPDH-catalyzed
reduction of GA by 0.2 mM NADH determined from the fit of data to eq .The energetic contribution of the
phosphodianion to stabilization of the transition state for GPDH-catalyzed
reduction of DHAP by NADH calculated from the data in this table using eq .[3,10]Ref (13).Ref (23).Ref (27)The Q295 mutants of hlGPDH catalyze
the slow reduction
of the truncated substrate GA by NADH (200 μM) at 25 °C,
pH 7.5 (10 mM TEA buffer), and I = 0.12 (NaCl). The
second-order rate constants (kcat/Km)E determined from the fit of plots of v/[E] against [GA] to a variant of
the Michaelis–Menten equation that treats (kcat/Km)E and Km as variable parameters. (Figure S1, Supporting Information) for the reactions catalyzed
by Q295G, Q295S, Q295A, and Q295N mutants are reported in Table . Figure A shows the dependence of vi/[E] (s–1) on [HPO32–] for the reduction of GA by NADH (200 μM)
catalyzed by the Q295G mutant of hlGPDH. Figure B–D shows
related data for reactions catalyzed by Q295S, Q295A, and Q295N mutants.
The solid lines through the experimental data show the nonlinear least-squares
fits of these data to eq , derived for Scheme , using the kinetic parameters reported in Table .[13]
Figure 3
Dependence
of v/[E] (s–1) on
HPO32– for the reduction of GA by NADH
(0.2 mM) catalyzed by Q295 mutants of hlGPDH at pH
7.5 (10 mM TEA buffer), 25 °C, and I = 0.12
(NaCl) on the concentration of HPO32– for reactions at different fixed concentrations of GA. (A) Q295G
mutant: ●, 3.6 mM GA; ▼, 3.0 mM; ◆, 2.4 mM; ○,
1.8 mM; ■, 1.2 mM; ▲, 0.6 mM. (B) Q295S: ●, 3.6
mM GA; ▼, 3.0 mM; ◆, 2.4 mM; ○, 1.8 mM; ■,
1.2 mM; ▲, 0.6 mM. (C) Q295A: ●, 3.6 mM GA; ◆,
2.4 mM; ■, 1.2 mM; ▲, 0.6 mM. (D) Q295N: ●, 3.6 mM GA; ◆, 2.4 mM; ■,
1.2 mM; ▲, 0.6 mM.
Scheme 2
Table 2
Kinetic
Parameters for Activation
of Wild-Type and hlGPDH by Phosphite Dianion and
Derived Parameters for the Binding of Dianions to [E·S]⧧ (Scheme )a
(kcat)E·Xb
KGAc
KHPid
kcat/KGAKHPi
(K⧧)HPie
RT ln(K⧧)Xf
enzyme
(s–1)
(mM)
(mM)
(M–2 s–1)
(M)
(kcal mol–1)
WT
5.5 ± 0.3
4.9 ± 0.2
70 ± 4
16000 ± 1300
3.3 × 10–6
–7.5
Q295G
1.0 ± 0.12
4.7 ± 0.32
110 ± 15
2100 ± 400
9.0 × 10–6
–6.9
Q295S
1.0 ± 0.12
4.5 ± 0.30
110 ± 15
2100 ± 400
8.0 × 10–6
–6.9
Q295A
0.07 ± 0.013
4.9 ± 0.04
130 ± 27
120 ± 30
1.1 × 10–4
–5.4
Q295N
0.03 ± 0.006
4.9 ± 0.55
100 ± 24
63 ± 15
5.0 × 10–4
–4.5
Reactions catalyzed by hlGPDH at pH
7.5 (10 mM TEA buffer), 25 °C, 0.2 mM NADH, and I = 0.12 (NaCl). The quoted uncertainty in these kinetic
parameters is the standard error determined for the nonlinear least-squares
fits of these data.
First-order
rate constant for turnover
of the Michaelis complex to form product (Scheme ).
Dissociation constant for release
of GA from the binary or ternary enzyme complex (Scheme ).
Dissociation constants for release
of the oxydianion from the binary or ternary enzyme complex (Scheme ).
Dissociation constants for release
of the dianion from the transition-state complex, calculated using eq , derived for Scheme .
Intrinsic dianion binding free energy
calculated from the data in this table using eq .
Dependence
of v/[E] (s–1) on
HPO32– for the reduction of GA by NADH
(0.2 mM) catalyzed by Q295 mutants of hlGPDH at pH
7.5 (10 mM TEA buffer), 25 °C, and I = 0.12
(NaCl) on the concentration of HPO32– for reactions at different fixed concentrations of GA. (A) Q295G
mutant: ●, 3.6 mM GA; ▼, 3.0 mM; ◆, 2.4 mM; ○,
1.8 mM; ■, 1.2 mM; ▲, 0.6 mM. (B) Q295S: ●, 3.6
mM GA; ▼, 3.0 mM; ◆, 2.4 mM; ○, 1.8 mM; ■,
1.2 mM; ▲, 0.6 mM. (C) Q295A: ●, 3.6 mM GA; ◆,
2.4 mM; ■, 1.2 mM; ▲, 0.6 mM. (D) Q295N: ●, 3.6 mM GA; ◆, 2.4 mM; ■,
1.2 mM; ▲, 0.6 mM.Reactions catalyzed by hlGPDH at pH
7.5 (10 mM TEA buffer), 25 °C, 0.2 mM NADH, and I = 0.12 (NaCl). The quoted uncertainty in these kinetic
parameters is the standard error determined for the nonlinear least-squares
fits of these data.First-order
rate constant for turnover
of the Michaelis complex to form product (Scheme ).Dissociation constant for release
of GA from the binary or ternary enzyme complex (Scheme ).Dissociation constants for release
of the oxydianion from the binary or ternary enzyme complex (Scheme ).Dissociation constants for release
of the dianion from the transition-state complex, calculated using eq , derived for Scheme .
Scheme 3
Intrinsic dianion binding free energy
calculated from the data in this table using eq .Figure A
shows
the effect of increasing concentrations of guanidine cation [Gua+] on the second-order rate constant (kcat/Km)obs for R269A/Q295A hlGPDH-catalyzed reduction of DHAP. The values of (kcat/Km)obs for reactions in the presence of different fixed [Gua+] were determined as the slopes of these linear correlations. Figure B shows the effect
of increasing [Gua+] on (kcat/Km)obs. The slope of the
linear correlation is equal to the third-order rate constant (kcat/Km)Gua/Kd = 1400 M–2 s–1. Figure C shows the effect of increasing concentrations of guanidine
cation [Gua+] on the second-order rate constant (kcat/Km)obs for R269A/N270A hlGPDH-catalyzed reduction of DHAP.
The values of (kcat/Km)obs for reactions in the presence of different
fixed [Gua+] were determined as the slopes of these linear
correlations. Figure D shows the effect of increasing [Gua+] on (kcat/Km)obs. The
slope of the linear correlation at [Gua+] is equal to the
third-order rate constant (kcat/Km)Gua/Kd = 3.5 M–2 s–1.
Figure 4
Effect of increasing
[Gua+] on R269A/Q295A and R269A/N270A
mutant hlGPDH-catalyzed reduction of DHAP by NADH
for reactions at pH 7.5 (20 mM TEA buffer), 25 °C, saturating
[NADH] = 0.2 mM, and I = 0.12 (NaCl). Top, for R269A/Q295A hlGPDH: (A) The increase in v/[E] (s–1), with increasing [DHAP], for reactions at different
fixed [Gua+]: ●, 80 mM Gua+; ▼,
60 mM Gua+; ◆, 40 mM Gua+; ▲,
20 mM Gua+. (B) The effect of increasing [Gua+] on the values of (kcat/Km)obs from panel A. (C) The increase in v/[E] (s–1), with increasing [DHAP], for reactions at different
fixed [Gua+]: ●, 80 mM Gua+; ▼,
60 mM Gua+; ■, 40 mM Gua+; ▲,
20 mM Gua+; ◆, 10 mM Gua. (D) The effect of increasing
[Gua+] on the values of (kcat/Km)obs from panel C.
Effect of increasing
[Gua+] on R269A/Q295A and R269A/N270A
mutant hlGPDH-catalyzed reduction of DHAP by NADH
for reactions at pH 7.5 (20 mM TEA buffer), 25 °C, saturating
[NADH] = 0.2 mM, and I = 0.12 (NaCl). Top, for R269A/Q295A hlGPDH: (A) The increase in v/[E] (s–1), with increasing [DHAP], for reactions at different
fixed [Gua+]: ●, 80 mM Gua+; ▼,
60 mM Gua+; ◆, 40 mM Gua+; ▲,
20 mM Gua+. (B) The effect of increasing [Gua+] on the values of (kcat/Km)obs from panel A. (C) The increase in v/[E] (s–1), with increasing [DHAP], for reactions at different
fixed [Gua+]: ●, 80 mM Gua+; ▼,
60 mM Gua+; ■, 40 mM Gua+; ▲,
20 mM Gua+; ◆, 10 mM Gua. (D) The effect of increasing
[Gua+] on the values of (kcat/Km)obs from panel C.
Discussion
The Q295 mutations result in up to a 150-fold decrease in (kcat/Km)DHAP for hlGPDH-catalyzed reduction of DHAP (Q295N),
but no more than a 3-fold decrease in (kcat/Km)GA for hlGPDH-catalyzed reduction of GA (Table ). The preferential effect of these mutations on (kcat/Km)DHAP shows that they cause a decrease in the intrinsic phosphodianion
binding energy (IBE, (ΔG⧧)Pi) utilized in the stabilization of the transition state
for hydride transfer (eq ).[3] The Q295 mutations likewise result
in only small (<2-fold) changes in the KHPi and KGA for dianion activated, hlGPDH-catalyzed reduction of the substrate piece glycolaldehyde,
but in large decreases in the third-order rate constant (kcat)E·X/KGAKHPi (M–2 s–1) dianion activation (Table ). This reflects the large effect of Q295 mutations on the
intrinsic phosphite dianion binding energy ((ΔG⧧)HPi, Scheme ), which may be calculated from the kinetic
parameters in Table using eq . We conclude
that Q295 promotes catalysis by optimizing transition-state stabilization
from interactions with the enzyme-bound phosphodianion of substrate
or with phosphite dianion.The logarithmic plot
(Figure S2) of
second-order rate constants (kcat/Km)DHAP for wild-type and mutant hlGPDH-catalyzed reduction of the whole substrate DHAP,
against the corresponding third-order rate constants (kcat)E·X/KGAKHPi for dianion activated hlGPDH-catalyzed reduction of GA, is linear with a slope of 1.1. This
linear correlation provides strong evidence that the whole and truncated
substrates for hlGPDH, which differ only by the covalent
connection at the former, proceed through similar transition states
that show similar changes in stability with changing side chain at
residue 295. Similar linear free-energy correlations, with slopes
of 1.0, of data for reactions catalyzed by wild-type and mutant enzymes
have been observed for triosephosphate isomerase- and orotidine 5′-monophosphate
decarboxylase-catalyzed reactions of whole and phosphodianion-truncated
substrates.[31−33]Figure shows
a
related linear correlation, also with slope of 1.1, between the intrinsic
phosphodianion binding energy (ΔG⧧)Pi (eq ) that is utilized for stabilization of the transition state for hlGPDH-catalyzed reduction of the whole substrate DHAP,
and the intrinsic phosphite dianion binding energy (ΔG⧧)HPi (eq ) that is utilized in stabilization of the
transition state for phosphite dianion-activated hlGPDH-catalyzed reduction of GA. This plot is similar to the direct
logarithmic plot of second- and third-order rate constants, since
mutations of Q295 cause only small changes in the second-order rate
constant (kcat/km)GA for catalysis of the reaction of phosphodianion
truncated substrate, which is used in the calculation of both (ΔG⧧)Pi (eq ) and (ΔG⧧)HPi (eq ).
Figure 5
Linear correlation, with slope of 1.1 ± 0.02, between
the
intrinsic phosphite dianion binding energy (ΔG⧧)HPi expressed at the transition state
for the reduction of the truncated substrate glycolaldehyde by NADH,
and the intrinsic phosphodianion binding energy (ΔG⧧)Pi expressed at the transition state
for the reduction of DHAP by NADH catalyzed by wild-type and Q295
mutants of hlGPDH.
Linear correlation, with slope of 1.1 ± 0.02, between
the
intrinsic phosphite dianion binding energy (ΔG⧧)HPi expressed at the transition state
for the reduction of the truncated substrate glycolaldehyde by NADH,
and the intrinsic phosphodianion binding energy (ΔG⧧)Pi expressed at the transition state
for the reduction of DHAP by NADH catalyzed by wild-type and Q295
mutants of hlGPDH.The near-unit slope from Figure shows that mutations
of Q295 result in nearly identical
falloffs in the intrinsic dianion binding energy utilized in the stabilization
of the transition states for the hlGPDH-catalyzed
reactions of the whole and the truncated substrates, so that this
side chain promotes optimal stabilization of these different transition
states through interactions with bound dianions. Q295 does not interact
directly with the phosphodianion, but sits in a flexible loop that
folds over the dianion.[10] The loop, in
turn, is anchored to the phosphodianion by interactions with the cationic
side chain of R269, which is ion-paired with the phosphodianion (Figure ). The network of
interactions that runs from Q295 to the substrate phosphodianion functions
to hold the flexible loop close to the substrate phosphodianion. We
propose that Q295 mutations of hlGPDH give rise to
a reorientation of this loop from its optimal “gripper”
conformation, that results in a reduction in the intrinsic dianion
binding energy.
Figure 6
Representation of the X-ray crystal structure (PDB entry 1WPQ) of the nonproductive
ternary Michaelis complex between wild-type hlGPDH,
DHAP, and NAD. The distances separating the amino acid side chains
(Arg-269, Asn-270, and Gln-295) from their neighboring side chains
and the substrate phosphodianion DHAP are also listed above.
Representation of the X-ray crystal structure (PDB entry 1WPQ) of the nonproductive
ternary Michaelis complex between wild-type hlGPDH,
DHAP, and NAD. The distances separating the amino acid side chains
(Arg-269, Asn-270, and Gln-295) from their neighboring side chains
and the substrate phosphodianionDHAP are also listed above.The Q295 mutations lead to ≤35-fold increases
in the Michaelis
constant Km, but a much smaller decrease
in kcat for hlGPDH-catalyzed
reduction of DHAP (Table ). This shows that the protein-dianion interactions, which
activate wild-type hlGPDH for catalysis of reduction
of DHAP, are expressed at the Michaelis complex for the bound DHAP.
These results may be rationalized by Scheme , where the binding energy of the substrate
phosphodianion is utilized to drive a conformational change (Figure ) that converts hlGPDH from the inactive open form (Eo = Eo·NADH) to the active closed form (Ec·DHAP).[2,10] Our results are consistent with
a value of Kc′ ≫ 1.0 for
the reaction catalyzed by the wild-type enzyme, so that the dianion
interactions are fully formed at the Michaelis complex. In this case,
a weakening of dianion interactions that result in a decrease in Kc′ will result in an increase in (Km)obs but no change in (kcat)obs (eqs and 5). A scheme similar to
that shown by Scheme was proposed to rationalize kinetic data reported for the decarboxylation
of orotidine 5′-monophosphate by wild-type OMPDC and a series
of mutants, with every possible single, double, and triple substitution
of side chains Q215 (Q215A), Y217 (Y217F), and R235 (R235A) that interact
the phosphodianion side chain of OMP.[33]
Scheme 4
Role of N270 and Q295 in Activation of hlGPDH
for Catalysis of Hydride Transfer
The amide side chains of
N270 and Q295 interact, respectively, with the substrate phosphodianion
and the cationic side chain of R269 (Figure ). The former interaction has the effect
of immobilizing the substrate phosphodianion, while the later has
the effect of immobilizing the cationic side chain of R269. These
interactions act to restrict the motion of the interacting cation
and phosphodianion at the enzyme active site. The following observations
provide strong evidence that such “preorganization” [34,35] of this ion pair has the effect of optimizing the strength of intermolecular
ionic interactions.(1) R269A mutation of wild-type hlGPDH results in a large (4.6 × 106)-fold
decrease in kcat/Km for reduction of DHAP by the binary E·NADH complex,
which corresponds to a 9.1 kcal/mol destabilization of the transition
state for hlGPDH-catalyzed hydride transfer. By comparison,
the R269A mutation of the Q295A mutant enzyme results in a smaller
4.9 kcal/mol transition-state destabilization (Figure A). These results are consistent with the
conclusion that the loss of the interaction between R269 and Q295
at the Q295A mutant results in a (9.1 – 4.9) = 4.2 kcal/mol
decrease in the stabilizing interaction between the cationic R269
side chain and the transition state for hlGPDH-catalyzed
hydride transfer.
Figure 7
Comparison of the effect of the R269A mutation on the
stability
of the transition state for wild-type hlGPDH-catalyzed
reduction of DHAP (9.1 kcal/mol) with the effect of the same mutation
on hlGPDH previously mutated at Q295 (A, 4.9 kcal/mol)
and at N270 (B, 5.9 kcal/mol). These differences in the effect of
an R269A mutation reflect the effect of the Q295A or N270A mutations
on the interaction between the cationic side chain of R269 and the
anionic transition state (see text).
Comparison of the effect of the R269A mutation on the
stability
of the transition state for wild-type hlGPDH-catalyzed
reduction of DHAP (9.1 kcal/mol) with the effect of the same mutation
on hlGPDH previously mutated at Q295 (A, 4.9 kcal/mol)
and at N270 (B, 5.9 kcal/mol). These differences in the effect of
an R269A mutation reflect the effect of the Q295A or N270A mutations
on the interaction between the cationic side chain of R269 and the
anionic transition state (see text).(2) The R269A mutation at N270A mutant hlGPDH
likewise results in a 5.9 kcal/mol transition-state destabilization
that is smaller than the 9.1 kcal/mol effect of the R269A mutation
of wild-type hlGPDH (Figure B). This is consistent with the conclusion
that the loss of the interaction between R269 and N270 at the N270A
mutant results in a (9.1 – 5.9) = 3.2 kcal/mol decrease in
the stabilizing interaction between the cationic side chain for R269
and the transition state for hlGPDH-catalyzed hydride
transfer. This and the previous result complement one another and
provide strong support for the conclusion that the side chains of
N270 and Q295 act to optimize the stabilizing interactions
between the guanidine side chain of R269 and the transition state
for hlGPDH-catalyzed reduction of DHAP by NADH.(3) The addition of Gua+ results in rescue of the activity
of R269A mutants for the reduction of DHAP.[23,36,37] This rescue is characterized experimentally
as the slope of a linear plot of observed second-order rate constants
(kcat/Km)obs for mutant hlGPDH-catalyzed reduction
of DHAP against the concentration of the Gua+ activator.
The slope of the plot for rescue of the R269A mutant is the third-order
rate constant [(kcat/Km)Gua/Kd] = 80 000
M–2 s–1.[23] The smaller [(kcat/Km)Gua/Kd] = 1400
M–2 s–1 (Figure B) and 3.5 M–2 s–1 (Figure D) determined
for the rescue of R269A/Q295A and R269A/N270A mutants by Gua+, respectively, show that N270A and Q295A mutations result in a falloff
in the efficiency of Gua+ rescue of R269A mutants.(4) The stabilizing interaction
between Gua+ and the
transition state for hydride transfer from NADH to DHAP, (ΔG⧧act)Gua, has been
quantified using eq derived for Scheme , where kcat/Km is the second-order rate constant for the unactivated mutant enzyme-catalyzed
reaction (Table ).
These results are illustrated graphically by Figure , where −(ΔG⧧T)R269 is the effect of
the R269A mutation on the reactivity of the whole substrate, −ΔG⧧Gua is the transition-state
stabilization recovered upon addition of 1.0 M Gua+, and
ΔG⧧S is the advantage
from the covalent connection of guanidine cation to the whole enzyme.[38] Substitution of the kinetic parameters for reactions
catalyzed by R269A, R269A/Q295A, and R269A/N270A mutants of hlGPDH into eq gives values of 6.7, 3.2, and 3.1 kcal/mol for stabilization of
the respective transition states by interaction with Gua+ (Figure ). We conclude
that the Q295A and N270A mutations result in a 6.7 – 3.2 =
3.5 kcal/mol and 6.7 – 3.1 = 3.6 kcal/mol weakening in the
interaction between exogenous Gua+ and the transition state
for reduction of DHAP catalyzed by R269A mutants of hlGPDH. By comparison, the same mutations result in 3.2 kcal/mol (Q295A, Figure A) and 4.2 kcal/mol
(N270A, Figure B)
reductions in the stabilizing interaction between the cationic side
chain for R269 and the transition state for hlGPDH-catalyzed
hydride transfer to DHAP.
Scheme 5
Figure 8
Diagrams that
show the effect of R269A mutations on the stability
of the transition states for wild-type and mutant hlGPDH-catalyzed reduction of DHAP (−(ΔG⧧T)R269), the partitioning
of this whole transition-state stabilization into the stabilization
recovered upon addition of 1.0 M Gua+ (−ΔG⧧Gua), and the advantage obtained
by connection of the guanidine cation to the whole enzyme (ΔG⧧S).[38]
Diagrams that
show the effect of R269A mutations on the stability
of the transition states for wild-type and mutant hlGPDH-catalyzed reduction of DHAP (−(ΔG⧧T)R269), the partitioning
of this whole transition-state stabilization into the stabilization
recovered upon addition of 1.0 M Gua+ (−ΔG⧧Gua), and the advantage obtained
by connection of the guanidine cation to the whole enzyme (ΔG⧧S).[38](5) The R269A mutant of hlGPDH, guanidine
cation,
and phosphite dianion assemble spontaneously to form a functioning
catalysis of the reduction of GA by NADH.[39] The surprising observation of this fourth-order enzyme-catalyzed
reaction reflects the efficient activation of hydride transfer from
binding of the guanidine cation–phosphite dianion pair to the
R269A mutant enzyme. The binding of this ion pair is assisted by the
interactions of the guanidine cation with the amide side chain of
Q295, and of phosphite dianion with the amide side of N270 (Figure ). We propose that
the function of this network of interactions is to stabilize an active
closed form of hlGPDH.[22]
Conclusions and Speculations
The sum of the effect
of R269A (9.1 kcal/mol), N270A (5.6 kcal/mol),
and Q295A (3.0 kcal/mol) on the stability of the transition state
for wild-type hlGPDH-catalyzed reduction of DHAP
(18.0 kcal/mol) is much larger than expected for the total interactions
between the transition state and the excised side chains. In particular,
the side chain of Q295 does not interact directly with this transition
state. We conclude that single mutations result in both the loss of
the interaction from the excised side chain and a weakening in the
stabilizing interactions with other participating side chains. The
side chains of Q295A and N270A interact, respectively, with the side
chain of R269 and the substrate phosphodianion:[23]Figure shows that these interactions are required for the observation of
the large 9.1 kcal/mol effect of the R269A mutation on transition-state
stability.It was previously assumed, for the sake of Occam’s
razor,
that the 9.1 kcal/mol effect of the R269A mutation is due entirely
to the loss of electrostatic interactions between the side-chain cation
or R269 and the highly anionic transition state for hydride transfer,
in which case these electrostatic interactions provide a 2.8 kcal/mol
stabilization of the Michaelis complex (effect of mutation on Km) and strengthen by 6.3 kcal/mol on proceeding
to the transition state for hydride transfer (kcat effect). One explanation for the tightening of these electrostatic
interactions on proceeding from the Michaelis complex to the transition
state is that this reflects the buildup of additional negative charge
at the carbonyl oxygen that occurs with transfer of a hydride anion
to the carbonyl carbon of DHAP. We are skeptical of this explanation,
because the large 5.7 Å distance (Figure ) between the side-chain cation and the carbonyl
oxygen does not favor a strong interaction between these sites. We
suggest two possible complicating events that would favor the observation
of a large effect of the R269A mutation on the stability of the transition
state for hydride transfer:(1) Figure shows
the nonproductive hlGPDH·NAD·DHAP complex.
The cationic side chain may lie closer to the C-2 carbonyl at the
productive hlGPDH·NADH·DHAP compared with
the 5.7 Å separation observed at the nonproductive hlGPDH·NAD·DHAP complex.(2) The C-2 carbonyl oxygen
of DHAP at the nonproductive hlGPDH·NAD·DHAP
complex lies nearer the cationic
side chains of K120 (3.5 Å) and K204 (3.8 Å) than to the
cationic side chain of R269 (ca. 6 Å). The optimal electrostatic
stabilization of the transition state for hydride transfer by interactions
from the K120 and K204 side chain will weaken if the R269A mutation
results in a loosening in the “tight” structure of the
ternary hlGPDH·NADH·DHAP complex and an
increase in the separation between these side chains and the C-2 carbonyl
oxygen. This proposal is consistent with the strong imperative for
electrophilic assistance to hydride transfer to the carbonyl carbon,[40,41] and with the notion that the conformational change of hlGPDH acts to organize catalytic active site side chains so that they
provide optimal transition-state stabilization.[34,42] This is similar to a previous proposal to rationalize the large
8.0 kcal/mol effect of the K12G mutation of the stability of the transition
state for the isomerization reaction catalyzed by triosephosphate
isomerase.[8,43]We suggest that the ligand-driven
conformational change of GPDH
involves a network of side chains that includes those from R269, N270,
and Q295, and possibly from K120 and K204, which lie close to the
carbonyl group of DHAP. This conformational change is driven largely
by the interactions between the substrate phosphodianion and the cationic
side chain of R269. However, the effect of the conformational change
on the stability of the transition state for hlGPDH-catalyzed
hydride transfer will include interactions from side chains that are
moved into a position to stabilize this transition state. If correct,
then the complications that arise from this model will need to be
dealt with when interpreting the effects of mutations of K120 and
K204, and possibly other amino acids, on the stability of the transition
state for hlGPDH-catalyzed hydride transfer.
Authors: Lawrence M Goldman; Tina L Amyes; Bogdana Goryanova; John A Gerlt; John P Richard Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2014-07-02 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Archie C Reyes; Xiang Zhai; Kelsey T Morgan; Christopher J Reinhardt; Tina L Amyes; John P Richard Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2015-01-20 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Lisa S Mydy; Judith R Cristobal; Roberto D Katigbak; Paul Bauer; Archie C Reyes; Shina Caroline Lynn Kamerlin; John P Richard; Andrew M Gulick Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2019-01-31 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Anil R Mhashal; Adrian Romero-Rivera; Lisa S Mydy; Judith R Cristobal; Andrew M Gulick; John P Richard; Shina C L Kamerlin Journal: ACS Catal Date: 2020-09-03 Impact factor: 13.084