This study investigates the validity of monitoring nose movement, using an infrared stereoscopic camera system (HDMM), to evaluate intracranial movement during treatment with the Icon™-model Gamma Knife®. METHODS: The HDMM was validated by comparison against known displacements. Next, an anthropomorphic phantom was rotated to register nose displacements on the HDMM, which were compared to the displacements of seven intracranial locations determined by cone-beam CT (CBCT). Similarly, CBCT-calculated intracranial displacements were compared against HDMM-reported nose displacements for patients. RESULTS: HDMM-indicated displacements were accurate within 0.06mm mean. In the phantom, CBCT-calculated nose displacements agreed within 0.05mm (mean) of HDMM-reported nose displacements. In 16 instances intracranial displacements exceeded nose displacements; at the most extreme by 73% (2.76mm versus 1.59mm). Overall, intracranial anatomy displaced by 43% (mean) less than the nose. Patient data included no intracranial target displacements exceeding nose displacements. CONCLUSIONS: Intracranial phantom and patient anatomy displaced by approximately half that of the nose, suggesting nose movement is generally a suitable surrogate for intracranial movement. The study constitutes the presentation of a simple, robust method that can be applied to determine the relationship between nose tip and intracranial motion in real patients undergoing frameless treatments on Icon™.
This study investigates the validity of monitoring nose movement, using an infrared stereoscopic camera system (HDMM), to evaluate intracranial movement during treatment with the Icon™-model Gamma Knife®. METHODS: The HDMM was validated by comparison against known displacements. Next, an anthropomorphic phantom was rotated to register nose displacements on the HDMM, which were compared to the displacements of seven intracranial locations determined by cone-beam CT (CBCT). Similarly, CBCT-calculated intracranial displacements were compared against HDMM-reported nose displacements for patients. RESULTS: HDMM-indicated displacements were accurate within 0.06mm mean. In the phantom, CBCT-calculated nose displacements agreed within 0.05mm (mean) of HDMM-reported nose displacements. In 16 instances intracranial displacements exceeded nose displacements; at the most extreme by 73% (2.76mm versus 1.59mm). Overall, intracranial anatomy displaced by 43% (mean) less than the nose. Patient data included no intracranial target displacements exceeding nose displacements. CONCLUSIONS: Intracranial phantom and patient anatomy displaced by approximately half that of the nose, suggesting nose movement is generally a suitable surrogate for intracranial movement. The study constitutes the presentation of a simple, robust method that can be applied to determine the relationship between nose tip and intracranial motion in real patients undergoing frameless treatments on Icon™.
Authors: Markus Stock; Kristina Kontrisova; Karin Dieckmann; Joachim Bogner; Richard Poetter; Dietmar Georg Journal: Med Phys Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Kathryn E Mittauer; Rohan Deraniyagala; Jonathan G Li; Bo Lu; Chihray Liu; Sanjiv S Samant; Judith L Lightsey; Guanghua Yan Journal: Med Phys Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Faisal T Sayer; Jonathan H Sherman; Chun-Po Yen; David J Schlesinger; Ronald Kersh; Jason P Sheehan Journal: World Neurosurg Date: 2011 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.104
Authors: Jonathan W Lischalk; Eric Oermann; Sean P Collins; Mani N Nair; Vikram V Nayar; Richa Bhasin; Jean-Marc Voyadzis; Sonali Rudra; Keith Unger; Brian T Collins Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2015-10-26 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Garrett C Baltz; Tina Briere; Dershan Luo; Rebecca M Howell; Shane Krafft; Eun Young Han Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Date: 2020-06-30 Impact factor: 2.102
Authors: Danushka S Seneviratne; Laura A Vallow; Austin Hadley; Timothy D Malouff; William C Stross; Steven Herchko; Deanna H Pafundi; Daniel M Trifiletti; Jennifer L Peterson Journal: J Radiosurg SBRT Date: 2020
Authors: Nels C Knutson; Brad J Hawkins; Douglas Bollinger; S Murty Goddu; James A Kavanaugh; Lakshmi Santanam; Timothy J Mitchell; Jacqueline E Zoberi; Christina Tsien; Jiayi Huang; Clifford G Robinson; Stephanie M Perkins; Joshua L Dowling; Michael R Chicoine; Keith M Rich; Gavin P Dunn; Sasa Mutic Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Date: 2019-05-04 Impact factor: 2.102
Authors: Jacob S Buatti; John M Buatti; Sridhar Yaddanapudi; Edward C Pennington; Dongxu Wang; Brandie Gross; Joël J St-Aubin; Daniel E Hyer; Mark C Smith; Ryan T Flynn Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Date: 2020-11-18 Impact factor: 2.102