Literature DB >> 32185087

Intracranial motion during frameless Gamma-Knife stereotactic radiosurgery.

Danushka S Seneviratne1, Laura A Vallow1, Austin Hadley2, Timothy D Malouff1, William C Stross1, Steven Herchko1, Deanna H Pafundi1, Daniel M Trifiletti1, Jennifer L Peterson1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE/
OBJECTIVES: The Gamma-Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) (Elekta AB, Stockholm) platform delivers highly conformal and precise radiation; however, intracranial displacement during treatment allows for the potential of a marginal target-miss. Frameless (mask-based) GKRS using the Gamma Knife Icon system monitors nasal tip motion as a surrogate for intracranial motion by tracking an infrared marker using a high-definition motion management (HDMM) system. To date, there is limited data available regarding the incidence and severity of motion and factors that impact intrafraction motion when treating with frameless GKRS. MATERIALS/
METHODS: A retrospective study was performed to evaluate patients with brain tumors who were treated with frameless GKRS using the Gamma Knife Icon between May and December 2018. All patients underwent mask-based immobilization using a thermoplastic mask. Data on patient demographics, mask type, use of bite block, and number of treatments received, use of anxiolytics, treatment time, and whether a physics clearance check was performed prior to treatment were collected. For each treatment session, average displacement (mm), maximum displacement (mm) and total treatment time (min) were recorded and logistic regression analyses were performed.
RESULTS: Data was collected for 89 consecutive treatments (38 patients). Of these, an anxiolytic was used in 61 treatments and a physics clearance check was performed for 45 treatments. The median average and maximum displacement was 0.60 mm and 1.22 mm, respectively. An average displacement greater than 0.60 mm was seen with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG) > 1, male gender, and malignant tumors (p < 0.05). Anxiolytic use prior to treatment was associated with a significant reduction in average displacement (p < 0.05). Significantly greater odds of observing a maximum displacement over 1.22 mm was seen with patients with ECOG > 1, male gender, and increased treatment time (p < 0.05). Age > 65 and anxiolytic use were associated with a significant reduction in maximum displacement (p < 0.05). Performance of clearance checks and use of bite block use did not impact average or maximum patient displacement.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to evaluate patient and treatment-related factors that influence intrafraction motion during GKRS with mask-based immobilization through HDMM tracking. Increased intracranial displacement during frameless GKRS was associated with higher ECOG, male gender, increased treatment time and malignant tumors, while anxiolytics were shown to mitigate excessive motion. Radiosurgery teams should consider these patient factors when treating patients with mask immobilization.
© 2020 Old City Publishing, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Frameless; intracranial displacement; intrafraction motion; mask-based Gamma-Knife

Year:  2020        PMID: 32185087      PMCID: PMC7065895     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT


  14 in total

1.  Stereotactic radiosurgery of the brain using the first United States 201 cobalt-60 source gamma knife.

Authors:  L D Lunsford; J Flickinger; G Lindner; A Maitz
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  Single versus Multifraction Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Large Brain Metastases: An International Meta-analysis of 24 Trials.

Authors:  Eric J Lehrer; Jennifer L Peterson; Nicholas G Zaorsky; Paul D Brown; Arjun Sahgal; Veronica L Chiang; Samuel T Chao; Jason P Sheehan; Daniel M Trifiletti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Stereotactic Shifts During Frame-Based Image-Guided Stereotactic Radiosurgery: Clinical Measurements.

Authors:  Sunil W Dutta; Roman O Kowalchuk; Daniel M Trifiletti; M Sean Peach; Jason P Sheehan; James M Larner; David Schlesinger
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Performance of a novel repositioning head frame for gamma knife perfexion and image-guided linac-based intracranial stereotactic radiotherapy.

Authors:  Mark Ruschin; Nazanin Nayebi; Per Carlsson; Kevin Brown; Messeret Tamerou; Winnie Li; Normand Laperriere; Arjun Sahgal; Young-Bin Cho; Cynthia Ménard; David Jaffray
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-04-10       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Stereotaxis and tomography. A technical note.

Authors:  L Leksell; B Jernberg
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 2.216

6.  Assessment of motion error for frame-based and noninvasive mask-based fixation using the Leksell Gamma Knife Icon radiosurgery system.

Authors:  Arthur Carminucci; Ke Nie; Joseph Weiner; Eric Hargreaves; Shabbar F Danish
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Inter- and intrafraction patient positioning uncertainties for intracranial radiotherapy: a study of four frameless, thermoplastic mask-based immobilization strategies using daily cone-beam CT.

Authors:  Erik Tryggestad; Matthew Christian; Eric Ford; Carmen Kut; Yi Le; Giuseppe Sanguineti; Danny Y Song; Lawrence Kleinberg
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  National trends in radiotherapy for brain metastases at time of diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Daniel M Trifiletti; Jason P Sheehan; Surbhi Grover; Sunil W Dutta; Chad G Rusthoven; Brian D Kavanagh; Arjun Sahgal; Timothy N Showalter
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 1.961

9.  Assessment of image co-registration accuracy for frameless gamma knife surgery.

Authors:  Hyun-Tai Chung; Jeong Hun Kim; Jin Wook Kim; Sun Ha Paek; Dong Gyu Kim; Kook Jin Chun; Tae Hoon Kim; Yong Kyun Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Frameless Fractionated Gamma Knife Radiosurgery with ICON™ for Large Metastatic Brain Tumors.

Authors:  Hye Ran Park; Kwang-Woo Park; Jae Meen Lee; Jung Hoon Kim; Sang Soon Jeong; Jin Wook Kim; Hyun-Tai Chung; Dong Gyu Kim; Sun Ha Paek
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 2.153

View more
  3 in total

1.  Predictors of Treatment Interruption During Frameless Gamma Knife Icon Stereotactic Radiosurgery.

Authors:  Rodney E Wegner; Linda Xu; Zachary Horne; Alexander Yu; Matthew Goss; Yun Liang; Jason Sohn; Stephen M Karlovits
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-07-01

2.  Single Fraction Frameless Stereotactic Radiosurgery on the Gamma Knife Icon for Patients With Brain Metastases: Time to Abandon the Frame?

Authors:  Rodney E Wegner; Zachary D Horne; Yun Liang; Matthew Goss; Alexander Yu; Jonathan Pace; Richard W Williamson; Jody Leonardo; Stephen M Karlovits; Russel Fuhrer
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-06-06

3.  Predictors of Significant Patient Movement During Frameless Radiosurgery with the Gamma Knife® Icon™ Cone-Beam CT.

Authors:  William N Duggar; Bart Morris; Rui He; Claus Chunli Yang
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-01-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.