Literature DB >> 29288067

Nationwide trends in the utilization of and payments for hysterectomy in the United States among commercially insured women.

Daniel M Morgan1, Neil S Kamdar2, Carolyn W Swenson2, Emily K Kobernik2, Anne G Sammarco2, Brahmajee Nallamothu3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparotomy followed by inpatient hospitalization has traditionally been the most common surgical care for hysterectomy. The financial implications of the increased use of laparoscopy and outpatient hysterectomy are unknown.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to quantify the increasing use of laparoscopy and outpatient hysterectomy and to describe the financial implications among women with commercially based insurance in the United States. STUDY
DESIGN: Hysterectomies between 2010 and 2013 were identified in the Health Care Cost Institute, a national data set with inpatient and outpatient private insurance claims for more than 25 million women. Surgical approach was categorized with procedure codes as abdominal, laparoscopic, laparoscopic assisted vaginal, or vaginal. Payments were adjusted to 2013 US dollars to account for change because of inflation.
RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2013, there were 386,226 women who underwent hysterectomy. The rate of utilization decreased 12.4%, from 39.9 to 35.0 hysterectomies per 10,000 women. The largest absolute decreases were observed among women younger than 55 years and among those with uterine fibroids, abnormal uterine bleeding, and endometriosis. The proportion of laparoscopic hysterectomies increased from 26.1% to 43.4%, with concomitant decreases in abdominal (38.6% to 28.3%), laparoscopic assisted vaginal (20.2 to 16.7%), and vaginal (15.1% to 11.5%) hysterectomies. There was also a shift from inpatient to outpatient surgery. In 2010, the inpatient and outpatient rates of hysterectomy were 26.6 and 13.3 per 10,000 women, respectively. By 2013, the rates were 15.4 and 19.6 per 10,000 women. In each year of analysis, the average reimbursement for outpatient procedures was 44-46% less than for similar inpatient procedures. Offsetting the lower utilization of hysterectomy and lower reimbursement for outpatient surgery were increases in average inpatient and outpatient hysterectomy reimbursement of 19.4% and 19.8%, respectively. Total payments for hysterectomy decreased 6.3%, from $823.4 million to $771.3 million.
CONCLUSION: Between 2010 and 2013, laparoscopy emerged as the most common surgical approach for hysterectomy, and outpatient hysterectomy became more common than inpatient among women with commercially based insurance. While average reimbursement per case increased, overall payments for hysterectomy are decreasing because of decreased utilization and dramatic differences in how hysterectomy is performed.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hysterectomy; laparoscopy; reimbursement; trends

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29288067      PMCID: PMC5931386          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  13 in total

1.  Regulatory Warnings and Use of Surgical Mesh in Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

Authors:  Art Sedrakyan; Bilal Chughtai; Jialin Mao
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 21.873

2.  Hysterectomy surveillance--United States, 1980-1993.

Authors:  L A Lepine; S D Hillis; P A Marchbanks; L M Koonin; B Morrow; B A Kieke; L S Wilcox
Journal:  MMWR CDC Surveill Summ       Date:  1997-08-08

3.  Determining Optimal Route of Hysterectomy for Benign Indications: Clinical Decision Tree Algorithm.

Authors:  Jennifer J Schmitt; Daniel A Carranza Leon; John A Occhino; Amy L Weaver; Sean C Dowdy; Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez; Kalyan S Pasupathy; John B Gebhart
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Outpatient vaginal hysterectomy: optimizing perioperative management for same-day discharge.

Authors:  Mark A Zakaria; Barbara S Levy
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 5.  Obesity and Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Eileen Shaw; Megan Farris; Jessica McNeil; Christine Friedenreich
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  2016

6.  Predictors of 30-day readmission and impact of same-day discharge in laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Authors:  Ashley J Jennings; Ryan J Spencer; Erin Medlin; Laurel W Rice; Shitanshu Uppal
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  The impact of alternative treatment for abnormal uterine bleeding on hysterectomy rates in a tertiary referral center.

Authors:  Heleen van Dongen; Amy G van de Merwe; Cornelis D de Kroon; Frank Willem Jansen
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 4.137

8.  Nationwide trends in the performance of inpatient hysterectomy in the United States.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Thomas J Herzog; Jennifer Tsui; Cande V Ananth; Sharyn N Lewin; Yu-Shiang Lu; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Inpatient Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in the United States: Trends and Factors Associated With Approach Selection.

Authors:  Vrunda Bhavsar Desai; Xiaoyue M Guo; Linda Fan; Jason D Wright; Xiao Xu
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 4.137

10.  Feasibility and safety of outpatient total laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Authors:  Sarah Maheux-Lacroix; Madeleine Lemyre; Vanessa Couture; Gabrielle Bernier; Philippe Y Laberge
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  27 in total

1.  Adnexectomy at the time of vaginal hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Emily A Slopnick; David D Sheyn; Graham C Chapman; Sangeeta T Mahajan; Sharif El-Nashar; Adonis K Hijaz
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Deranged chromatin drives uterine fibroid tumours.

Authors:  Zehra Ordulu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Savings with expanding use of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device and fewer benign hysterectomies.

Authors:  Daniel M Morgan; Neil S Kamdar; Vanessa K Dalton; Carolyn W Swenson; Michelle H Moniz; Brahmajee Nallamothu
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Trends and predictors of hysterectomy prevalence among women in the United States.

Authors:  Summer V Harvey; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Rebecca Landy; Nicolas Wentzensen; Megan A Clarke
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 10.693

5.  Impact of Obesity on Clinical and Financial Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy for Benign Conditions.

Authors:  Margot Le Neveu; Abdelrahman AlAshqar; Jaden Kohn; Anastasia Tambovtseva; Karen C Wang; Mostafa A Borahay
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2022-05-20

6.  Association of Oophorectomy and Fat and Lean Body Mass: Evidence from a Population-Based Sample of U.S. Women.

Authors:  Pritesh S Karia; Corinne E Joshu; Kala Visvanathan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Historical and projected hysterectomy rates in the USA: Implications for future observed cervical cancer rates and evaluating prevention interventions.

Authors:  Kate T Simms; Susan Yuill; James Killen; Megan A Smith; Shalini Kulasingam; Inge M C M de Kok; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Emily A Burger; Catherine Regan; Jane J Kim; Karen Canfell
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-07-26       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Moving Beyond Reflexive and Prophylactic Gynecologic Surgery.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Stewart; Stacey A Missmer; Walter A Rocca
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 11.104

9.  Two-Layer Compared With One-Layer Vaginal Cuff Closure at the Time of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy to Reduce Complications.

Authors:  Ann Peters; Riyas Ali; Shana Miles; Christine E Foley; Alexandra Buffie; Kristine Ruppert; Suketu M Mansuria
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 7.623

10.  Impact of a National Private Health Insurer's Prior Authorization Policy on Utilization of Vaginal Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Carolyn W Swenson; Neil S Kamdar; Kristian Seiler; Daniel M Morgan
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 1.913

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.