Literature DB >> 33879451

Association of Oophorectomy and Fat and Lean Body Mass: Evidence from a Population-Based Sample of U.S. Women.

Pritesh S Karia1, Corinne E Joshu1,2,3, Kala Visvanathan4,2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bilateral oophorectomy during a nonmalignant hysterectomy is frequently performed for ovarian cancer prevention in premenopausal women. Oophorectomy before menopause leads to an abrupt decline in ovarian hormones that could adversely affect body composition. We examined the relationship between oophorectomy and whole-body composition.
METHODS: Our study population included cancer-free women 35 to 70 years old from the 1999-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, a representative sample of the U.S. POPULATION: A total of 4,209 women with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scans were identified, including 445 with hysterectomy, 552 with hysterectomy and oophorectomy, and 3,212 with no surgery. Linear regression was used to estimate the difference in total and regional (trunk, arms, and legs) fat and lean body mass by surgery status.
RESULTS: In multivariable models, hysterectomy with and without oophorectomy was associated with higher total fat mass [mean percent difference (β); βoophorectomy: 1.61%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.00-2.28; βhysterectomy: 0.88%; 95% CI, 0.12-1.58] and lower total lean mass [βoophorectomy: -1.48%; 95% CI, -2.67, -1.15; βhysterectomy: -0.87%; 95% CI, -1.50, -0.24) compared with no surgery. Results were stronger in women with a normal body mass index (BMI) and those <45 years at surgery. All body regions were significantly affected for women with oophorectomy, whereas only the trunk was affected for women with hysterectomy alone.
CONCLUSIONS: Hysterectomy with oophorectomy, particularly in young women, may be associated with systemic changes in fat and lean body mass irrespective of BMI. IMPACT: Our results support prospective evaluation of body composition in women undergoing hysterectomy with oophorectomy at a young age. ©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33879451      PMCID: PMC8258842          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-1849

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  54 in total

Review 1.  Estrogen, menopause, and the aging brain: how basic neuroscience can inform hormone therapy in women.

Authors:  John H Morrison; Roberta D Brinton; Peter J Schmidt; Andrea C Gore
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Association of risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with cancer risk and mortality.

Authors:  Susan M Domchek; Tara M Friebel; Christian F Singer; D Gareth Evans; Henry T Lynch; Claudine Isaacs; Judy E Garber; Susan L Neuhausen; Ellen Matloff; Rosalind Eeles; Gabriella Pichert; Laura Van t'veer; Nadine Tung; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Fergus J Couch; Wendy S Rubinstein; Patricia A Ganz; Mary B Daly; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Gail Tomlinson; Joellen Schildkraut; Joanne L Blum; Timothy R Rebbeck
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Nationwide trends in the utilization of and payments for hysterectomy in the United States among commercially insured women.

Authors:  Daniel M Morgan; Neil S Kamdar; Carolyn W Swenson; Emily K Kobernik; Anne G Sammarco; Brahmajee Nallamothu
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  From menarche to menopause: trends among US Women born from 1912 to 1969.

Authors:  Hazel B Nichols; Amy Trentham-Dietz; John M Hampton; Linda Titus-Ernstoff; Kathleen M Egan; Walter C Willett; Polly A Newcomb
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Low relative skeletal muscle mass (sarcopenia) in older persons is associated with functional impairment and physical disability.

Authors:  Ian Janssen; Steven B Heymsfield; Robert Ross
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Increased cardiovascular mortality after early bilateral oophorectomy.

Authors:  Cathleen M Rivera; Brandon R Grossardt; Deborah J Rhodes; Robert D Brown; Véronique L Roger; L Joseph Melton; Walter A Rocca
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Factors associated with undergoing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy for benign conditions.

Authors:  Vanessa L Jacoby; Eric Vittinghoff; Sanae Nakagawa; Rebecca Jackson; Holly E Richter; John Chan; Miriam Kuppermann
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Cancer risk in relation to body fat distribution, evaluated by DXA-scans, in postmenopausal women - the Prospective Epidemiological Risk Factor (PERF) study.

Authors:  Line Mærsk Staunstrup; Henning Bay Nielsen; Bente Klarlund Pedersen; Morten Karsdal; Joseph Patrick Michele Blair; Jesper Frank Christensen; Cecilie Liv Bager
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Body mass index following natural menopause and hysterectomy with and without bilateral oophorectomy.

Authors:  C J Gibson; R C Thurston; S R El Khoudary; K Sutton-Tyrrell; K A Matthews
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 5.095

10.  Association of Age at Menopause With Incident Heart Failure: A Prospective Cohort Study and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Duke Appiah; Pamela J Schreiner; Ellen W Demerath; Laura R Loehr; Patricia P Chang; Aaron R Folsom
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.