Literature DB >> 34259464

Two-Layer Compared With One-Layer Vaginal Cuff Closure at the Time of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy to Reduce Complications.

Ann Peters1, Riyas Ali, Shana Miles, Christine E Foley, Alexandra Buffie, Kristine Ruppert, Suketu M Mansuria.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore whether two-layer laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure at the time of laparoscopic hysterectomy is associated with a lower rate of postoperative complications compared with a standard one-layer cuff closure.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of total laparoscopic hysterectomies performed by fellowship-trained minimally invasive gynecologic surgeons between 2011 and 2017 was performed. Surgeons sutured the vaginal cuff laparoscopically, either in a two- or one-layer closure. The primary outcome was a composite of total postoperative complications, including all medical and surgical complications within 30 days and vaginal cuff complications within 180 days. Factors known to influence laparoscopic vaginal cuff complications including age, postmenopausal status, body mass index, tobacco use, and immunosuppressant medications were examined and controlled for, while surgeon skill, colpotomy technique, and suture material remained standardized. We conducted statistical analyses including χ2, Fisher exact test, logistic regression, and post hoc power calculations.
RESULTS: Of the 2,973 women who underwent total laparoscopic hysterectomies, 40.8% (n=1,213) of vaginal cuffs were closed with a two-layer closure and 59.2% (n=1,760) with a one-layer technique. Two-layer vaginal cuff closure was associated with decreased numbers of total postoperative complications (3.5% vs 5.7%; P<.01). The primary difference stemmed from lower vaginal cuff complications within 180 days (0.9% vs 2.6%; P<.01); no differences in 30-day medical and surgical postoperative complications were observed between the two groups (2.6% vs 3.1%; P=.77). No patients in the two-layer vaginal cuff closure cohort experienced a vaginal cuff dehiscence or mucosal separation compared with 1.0% in the one-layer group (P<.01). Compared with a one-layer closure, a two-layer closure was protective from postoperative complications (adjusted odds ratio 0.38, 95% CI 0.19-0.74).
CONCLUSION: Although postoperative complications with laparoscopic hysterectomies are rare, two-layer laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure is associated with lower total postoperative complications compared with a one-layer closure. The difference was primary driven by cuff complications.
Copyright © 2021 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34259464      PMCID: PMC9534582          DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004428

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.623


  24 in total

1.  Vaginal cuff dehiscence after different modes of hysterectomy.

Authors:  Hye-Chun Hur; Nicole Donnellan; Suketu Mansuria; Rachel E Barber; Richard Guido; Ted Lee
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 2.  Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence and Evisceration: A Review.

Authors:  Camran Nezhat; Megan Kennedy Burns; Michelle Wood; Ceana Nezhat; Azadeh Nezhat; Farr Nezhat
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Vaginal cuff dehiscence in a series of 12,398 hysterectomies: effect of different types of colpotomy and vaginal closure.

Authors:  Amanda Stevens; M Ali Parsa; Chandhana Paka; Jacqualin Miller; Elizabeth Buescher; Azadeh Nezhat
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Hysterectomy rates in the United States 1990-1997.

Authors:  Cynthia M Farquhar; Claudia A Steiner
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 5.  Vaginal cuff dehiscence: risk factors and management.

Authors:  Beth Cronin; Vivian W Sung; Kristen A Matteson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Nationwide trends in the performance of inpatient hysterectomy in the United States.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Thomas J Herzog; Jennifer Tsui; Cande V Ananth; Sharyn N Lewin; Yu-Shiang Lu; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 7.  Surgical outcomes for low-volume vs high-volume surgeons in gynecology surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alex Mowat; Christopher Maher; Emma Ballard
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 8.  Complications of hysterectomy.

Authors:  Daniel L Clarke-Pearson; Elizabeth J Geller
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Obesity and older age as protective factors for vaginal cuff dehiscence following total hysterectomy.

Authors:  Nicole M Donnellan; Suketu Mansuria; Nancy Aguwa; Deirdre Lum; Leslie Meyn; Ted Lee
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2015-01-30

Review 10.  Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.

Authors:  Johanna W M Aarts; Theodoor E Nieboer; Neil Johnson; Emma Tavender; Ray Garry; Ben Willem J Mol; Kirsten B Kluivers
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.