Literature DB >> 27926638

Determining Optimal Route of Hysterectomy for Benign Indications: Clinical Decision Tree Algorithm.

Jennifer J Schmitt1, Daniel A Carranza Leon, John A Occhino, Amy L Weaver, Sean C Dowdy, Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez, Kalyan S Pasupathy, John B Gebhart.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate practice change after initiation of a robotic surgery program using a clinical algorithm to determine the optimal surgical approach to benign hysterectomy.
METHODS: A retrospective postrobot cohort of benign hysterectomies (2009-2013) was identified and the expected surgical route was determined from an algorithm using vaginal access and uterine size as decision tree branches. We excluded the laparoscopic hysterectomy route. A prerobot cohort (2004-2005) was used to evaluate a practice change after the addition of robotic technology (2007). Costs were estimated.
RESULTS: Cohorts were similar in regard to uterine size, vaginal parity, and prior laparotomy history. In the prerobot cohort (n=473), 320 hysterectomies (67.7%) were performed vaginally and 153 (32.3%) through laparotomy with 15.1% (46/305) performed abdominally when the algorithm specified vaginal hysterectomy. In the postrobot cohort (n=1,198), 672 hysterectomies (56.1%) were vaginal; 390 (32.6%) robot-assisted; and 136 (11.4%) abdominal. Of 743 procedures, 38 (5.1%) involved laparotomy and 154 (20.7%) involved robotic technique when a vaginal approach was expected. Robotic hysterectomies had longer operations (141 compared with 59 minutes, P<.001) and higher rates of surgical site infection (4.7% compared with 0.2%, P<.001) and urinary tract infection (8.1% compared with 4.1%, P=.05) but no difference in major complications (P=.27) or readmissions (P=.27) compared with vaginal hysterectomy. Algorithm conformance would have saved an estimated $800,000 in hospital costs over 5 years.
CONCLUSION: When a decision tree algorithm indicated vaginal hysterectomy as the route of choice, vaginal hysterectomy was associated with shorter operative times, lower infection rate, and lower cost. Vaginal hysterectomy should be the route of choice when feasible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27926638      PMCID: PMC5217714          DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001756

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  7 in total

Review 1.  Entry into the anterior cul-de-sac during vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Brian J Linder; John B Gebhart
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Nationwide trends in the utilization of and payments for hysterectomy in the United States among commercially insured women.

Authors:  Daniel M Morgan; Neil S Kamdar; Carolyn W Swenson; Emily K Kobernik; Anne G Sammarco; Brahmajee Nallamothu
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Clinical Determinants of Vaginal and Abdominal Hysterectomy for Benign Conditions at the University Teaching Hospital, Yaounde-Cameroon.

Authors:  P M Tebeu; R Tayou; J S S Antaon; Y N Mawamba; V M Koh; J P Ngou-Mve-Ngou
Journal:  J West Afr Coll Surg       Date:  2022-01-05

4.  Hysterectomy with Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy in Female-to-Male Gender Affirmation Surgery: Comparison of Two Methods.

Authors:  M Jeftovic; B Stojanovic; M Bizic; D Stanojevic; J Kisic; M Bencic; M L Djordjevic
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Robotic transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for bilateral salpingo oophorectomy.

Authors:  Lior Lowenstein; Emad Matanes; Zeev Weiner; Jan Baekelandt
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X       Date:  2020-06-23

6.  Unexpected malignancy at the time of hysterectomy performed for a benign indication: A retrospective review.

Authors:  Cara G Elliott; Ally Murji; John Matelski; Adebanke Bianca Adekola; Jessica Chrzanowski; Lindsay Shirreff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Healthcare and Indirect Cost of the Laparoscopic vs. Vaginal Approach in Benign Hysterectomy.

Authors:  María Ángeles Martínez-Maestre; Francisco Jódar-Sánchez; Ana María Calderón-Cabrera; Carmen González-Cejudo; José Manuel Silván-Alfaro; Lidia María Melero-Cortés
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2022 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.789

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.