Literature DB >> 23168760

Outpatient vaginal hysterectomy: optimizing perioperative management for same-day discharge.

Mark A Zakaria1, Barbara S Levy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To present tactics for optimizing outpatient vaginal hysterectomy and describe perioperative outcomes in a large consecutive case series.
METHODS: This is a descriptive study and review of clinical outcomes in 1,071 patients selected to undergo vaginal hysterectomy for benign indications from 2000 to 2010. The setting is a single-surgeon private practice in a community hospital. Outcome measures include length of hospital stay, estimated blood loss, operative time, uterine weight, and perioperative complications, including hospital readmissions and emergency room visits.
RESULTS: One thousand seventy-one of 1,162 cases (92%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 90.5-93.7) were total vaginal hysterectomies, of which 1,029 (96%, 95% CI 94.9-97.3) were discharged the same day after surgery. The median operative time was 34 minutes (range 17-210 minutes), and estimated blood loss was 45 mL (range 5-800 mL). The median patient age was 46 years (range 27-86 years), and median uterine weight was 160 g (range 25-1,380 g). One hundred ninety-three patients (18%, 95% CI 15.8-20.5) were nulliparous and 218 (20%, 95% CI 18-22.9) had prior pelvic surgery. Five patients (0.5%, 95% CI 0.2-1.1) required readmission or emergency room evaluation within the first 30 days.
CONCLUSION: Vaginal hysterectomy can be successfully adopted as a same-day discharge procedure. In this population, regardless of previous pelvic surgery or nulliparity, good perioperative outcomes have been achieved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23168760     DOI: 10.1097/aog.0b013e3182732ece

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  8 in total

Review 1.  Vaginal Hysterectomy: The Present Past.

Authors:  Dionysios K Veronikis
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec

2.  The Decreasing Length of Hospital Stay following Vaginal Hysterectomy: 2011-2012 vs. 1996-1997 vs. 1995-1996.

Authors:  P Reif; T Drobnitsch; T Aigmüller; R Laky; D Ulrich; J Haas; A Bader; K Tamussino
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.915

3.  Vaginal hysterectomy: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Michael D Moen; Holly E Richter
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Extending the limits of vaginal hysterectomy under local anesthesia and conscious sedation.

Authors:  Themos Grigoriadis; Dimitrios Zacharakis; Konstantinos Kypriotis; Athanasios Protopapas; Sofia Hadzillia; Stavros Athanasiou
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Nationwide trends in the utilization of and payments for hysterectomy in the United States among commercially insured women.

Authors:  Daniel M Morgan; Neil S Kamdar; Carolyn W Swenson; Emily K Kobernik; Anne G Sammarco; Brahmajee Nallamothu
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Non-decent Vaginal Hysterectomy in Rural Setup of MP: A Poor Acceptance.

Authors:  Sapna B Jain; Kshma D Chandrakar
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2016-03-12

7.  Updated hysterectomy surveillance and factors associated with minimally invasive hysterectomy.

Authors:  Sarah L Cohen; Allison F Vitonis; Jon I Einarsson
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 8.  Preemptive local analgesia at vaginal hysterectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nadja Taumberger; Anna-Maria Schütz; Klaus Jeitler; Andrea Siebenhofer; Holger Simonis; Helmar Bornemann-Cimenti; Rene Laky; Karl Tamussino
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 1.932

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.