Literature DB >> 23969789

Nationwide trends in the performance of inpatient hysterectomy in the United States.

Jason D Wright1, Thomas J Herzog, Jennifer Tsui, Cande V Ananth, Sharyn N Lewin, Yu-Shiang Lu, Alfred I Neugut, Dawn L Hershman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the use of inpatient hysterectomy and explore changes in the use of various routes of hysterectomy and patterns of referral.
METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used to identify all women aged 18 years or older who underwent inpatient hysterectomy between 1998 and 2010. Weighted estimates of national trends were calculated and the number of procedures performed estimated. Trends in hospital volume and across hospital characteristics were examined.
RESULTS: After weighting, we identified a total 7,438,452 women who underwent inpatient hysterectomy between 1998 and 2010. The number of hysterectomies performed annually rose from 543,812 in 1998 to a peak of 681,234 in 2002; it then declined consistently annually and reached 433,621 cases in 2010. Overall, 247,973 (36.4%) fewer hysterectomies were performed in 2010 compared with 2002. From 2002 to 2010 the number of hysterectomies performed for each of the following indications declined: leiomyoma (-47.6%), abnormal bleeding (-28.9%), benign ovarian mass (-63.1%), endometriosis (-65.3%), and pelvic organ prolapse (-39.4%). The median hospital case volume decreased from 83 procedures per year in 2002 to 50 cases per year in 2010 (P<.001).
CONCLUSION: The number of inpatient hysterectomies performed in the United States has declined substantially over the past decade. The median number of hysterectomies per hospital has declined likewise by more than 40%. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23969789      PMCID: PMC3913114          DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318299a6cf

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  139 in total

1.  Open abdominal surgery: a diminishing art.

Authors:  Paul Riss; George Ralph; Peter Dwyer
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Safely Increase the Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy Rate: A Novel Three-Tiered Preoperative Categorization System Can Predict the Difficulty for Benign Disease.

Authors:  Esteban Andryjowicz; Teresa B Wray; V Reinaldo Ruiz; James Rudolf; Sara Noroozkhani; Sandra Crowder; Jeff M Slezak
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2015-07-24

3.  Are perioperative bundles associated with reduced postoperative morbidity in women undergoing benign hysterectomy? Retrospective cohort analysis of 16,286 cases in Michigan.

Authors:  John A Harris; Anne G Sammarco; Carolyn W Swenson; Shitanshu Uppal; Neil Kamdar; Darrel Campbell; Sarah Evilsizer; John O DeLancey; Daniel M Morgan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Utilization of apical vaginal support procedures at time of inpatient hysterectomy performed for benign conditions: a national estimate.

Authors:  Whitney Trotter Ross; Melanie R Meister; Jonathan P Shepherd; Margaret A Olsen; Jerry L Lowder
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Hysterectomy Uniquely Impacts Spatial Memory in a Rat Model: A Role for the Nonpregnant Uterus in Cognitive Processes.

Authors:  Stephanie V Koebele; Justin M Palmer; Bryanna Hadder; Ryan Melikian; Carly Fox; Isabel M Strouse; Dale F DeNardo; Christina George; Emily Daunis; Adrianna Nimer; Loretta P Mayer; Cheryl A Dyer; Heather A Bimonte-Nelson
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 4.736

6.  Trends in Inpatient and Outpatient Hysterectomy and Oophorectomy Rates Among Commercially Insured Women in the United States, 2000-2014.

Authors:  Kemi M Doll; Stacie B Dusetzina; Whitney Robinson
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 14.766

7.  Feasibility of prophylactic salpingectomy during vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Danielle D Antosh; Rachel High; Heidi W Brown; Sallie S Oliphant; Husam Abed; Nisha Philip; Cara L Grimes
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Why do we argue about route of hysterectomy? A call for dialogue.

Authors:  Andrew J Walter
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 9.  Medical Device Safety and Surgical Dissemination of Unrecognized Uterine Malignancy: Morcellation in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery.

Authors:  Tracilyn Hall; Susanna I Lee; David M Boruta; Annekathryn Goodman
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-09-17

10.  Trends in the national distribution of laparoscopic hysterectomies from 2003 to 2010.

Authors:  Jinhyung Lee; Kristofer Jennings; Mostafa A Borahay; Ana M Rodriguez; Gokhan S Kilic; Russell R Snyder; Pooja R Patel
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 4.137

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.