Literature DB >> 31115610

Adnexectomy at the time of vaginal hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse.

Emily A Slopnick1, David D Sheyn2, Graham C Chapman2, Sangeeta T Mahajan2, Sharif El-Nashar2, Adonis K Hijaz2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Preoperative counseling about salpingectomy with pelvic surgery is recommended by the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology for ovarian cancer risk reduction. Our objective was to determine recent practice patterns and patient factors associated with salpingectomy with vaginal hysterectomy (VH) for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in the USA. We hypothesize that salpingectomy might have become more common in recent years.
METHODS: We queried the 2014-2016 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database for women with a postoperative diagnosis of POP who underwent VH with any combination of pelvic reconstructive procedures. CPT codes do not differentiate salpingectomy from salpingo-oophorectomy, so subjects were stratified by whether concurrent adnexectomy was performed. Chi-squared and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate characteristics associated with adnexectomy. Propensity score matching was utilized when evaluating postoperative complication rates.
RESULTS: Of 5,344 women who underwent VH, 2019 (37.8%) had adnexectomy. Adnexectomy rate increased from 34.4% in 2014 to 46.8% in 2016 (p < 0.001). Adnexectomy rates of fellowship-trained urogynecologists and general gynecologists were similar (36.0% vs 38.8%, p = 0.197). On logistic regression analysis, patients more likely to undergo adnexectomy were < 65 years old (OR 0.844, CI 0.75-0.95, p = 0.004), had BMI <30 (OR 0.76, CI 0.68-0.86, p < 0.001), and were non-smokers (OR 0.78, CI 0.64-0.95, p = 0.016). Mean operative time was 17 min longer with adnexectomy (145 vs 128 min, p < 0.001). There were no differences in postoperative complications or reoperation rates between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Adnexectomy during VH for POP is safe and increasingly utilized by gynecology surgeons in the USA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Database; Gynecology; Health services research; Hysterectomy; Pelvic organ prolapse; Salpingectomy; Vaginal

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31115610     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-019-03967-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  24 in total

Review 1.  Wound healing and infection in surgery. The clinical impact of smoking and smoking cessation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lars Tue Sørensen
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2012-04

2.  Extending the safety evidence for opportunistic salpingectomy in prevention of ovarian cancer: a cohort study from British Columbia, Canada.

Authors:  Gillian E Hanley; Janice S Kwon; Sarah J Finlayson; David G Huntsman; Dianne Miller; Jessica N McAlpine
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Vaginal Salpingectomy Techniques in the Presence of Ovarian Conservation.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Cornella
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 4.137

Review 4.  The role of the fallopian tube in the origin of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Britt K Erickson; Michael G Conner; Charles N Landen
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Opportunistic salpingectomy: uptake, risks, and complications of a regional initiative for ovarian cancer prevention.

Authors:  Jessica N McAlpine; Gillian E Hanley; Michelle M M Woo; Alicia A Tone; Nirit Rozenberg; Kenneth D Swenerton; C Blake Gilks; Sarah J Finlayson; David G Huntsman; Dianne M Miller
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Possible origin of ovarian cancer in the fallopian tubes.

Authors:  Priya Venkatesan
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  The performance and safety of bilateral salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention in the United States.

Authors:  Gillian Elizabeth Hanley; Jessica Nell McAlpine; Celeste Leigh Pearce; Dianne Miller
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Updated hysterectomy surveillance and factors associated with minimally invasive hysterectomy.

Authors:  Sarah L Cohen; Allison F Vitonis; Jon I Einarsson
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 9.  Identifying older adults at risk of harm following elective surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jennifer Watt; Andrea C Tricco; Catherine Talbot-Hamon; Ba' Pham; Patricia Rios; Agnes Grudniewicz; Camilla Wong; Douglas Sinclair; Sharon E Straus
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 8.775

Review 10.  Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.

Authors:  Johanna W M Aarts; Theodoor E Nieboer; Neil Johnson; Emma Tavender; Ray Garry; Ben Willem J Mol; Kirsten B Kluivers
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.