Emilie Bollache1, Paul W M Fedak2, Pim van Ooij3, Ozair Rahman1, S Chris Malaisrie4, Patrick M McCarthy4, James C Carr1, Alex Powell1, Jeremy D Collins1, Michael Markl5, Alex J Barker6. 1. Department of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill. 2. Department of Cardiac Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Division of Surgery-Cardiac Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill. 3. Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 4. Division of Surgery-Cardiac Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill. 5. Department of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill; Department of Biomedical Engineering, McCormick School of Engineering, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill. 6. Department of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill. Electronic address: Alex.barker@northwestern.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess in patients with aortopathy perioperative changes in thoracic aortic wall shear stress (WSS), which is known to affect arterial remodeling, and the effects of specific surgical interventions. METHODS: Presurgical and postsurgical aortic 4D flow MRI were performed in 33 patients with aortopathy (54 ± 14 years; 5 women; sinus of Valsalva (d_SOV)/midascending aortic (d_MAA) diameters = 44 ± 5/45 ± 6 mm) scheduled for aortic valve (AVR) and/or root (ARR) replacement. Control patients with aortopathy who did not have surgery were matched for age, sex, body size, and d_MAA (n = 20: 52 ± 14 years; 3 women; d_SOV/d_MAA = 42 ± 4/42 ± 4 mm). Regional aortic 3D systolic peak WSS was calculated. An atlas of WSS normal values was used to quantify the percentage of at-risk tissue area with abnormally high WSS, excluding the area to be resected/graft. RESULTS: Peak WSS and at-risk area showed low interobserver variability (≤0.09 [-0.3; 0.5] Pa and 1.1% [-7%; 9%], respectively). In control patients, WSS was stable over time (follow-up-baseline differences ≤0.02 Pa and 0.0%, respectively). Proximal aortic WSS decreased after AVR (n = 5; peak WSS difference ≤-0.41 Pa and at-risk area ≤-10%, P < .05 vs controls). WSS was increased after ARR in regions distal to the graft (peak WSS difference ≥0.16 Pa and at-risk area ≥4%, P < .05 vs AVR). Follow-up duration had no significant effects on these WSS changes, except when comparing ascending aortic peak WSS between ARR and AVR (P = .006). CONCLUSIONS: Serial perioperative 4D flow MRI investigations showed distinct patterns of postsurgical changes in aortic WSS, which included both reductions and translocations. Larger longitudinal studies are warranted to validate these findings with clinical outcomes and prediction of risk of future aortic events.
OBJECTIVES: To assess in patients with aortopathy perioperative changes in thoracic aortic wall shear stress (WSS), which is known to affect arterial remodeling, and the effects of specific surgical interventions. METHODS: Presurgical and postsurgical aortic 4D flow MRI were performed in 33 patients with aortopathy (54 ± 14 years; 5 women; sinus of Valsalva (d_SOV)/midascending aortic (d_MAA) diameters = 44 ± 5/45 ± 6 mm) scheduled for aortic valve (AVR) and/or root (ARR) replacement. Control patients with aortopathy who did not have surgery were matched for age, sex, body size, and d_MAA (n = 20: 52 ± 14 years; 3 women; d_SOV/d_MAA = 42 ± 4/42 ± 4 mm). Regional aortic 3D systolic peak WSS was calculated. An atlas of WSS normal values was used to quantify the percentage of at-risk tissue area with abnormally high WSS, excluding the area to be resected/graft. RESULTS: Peak WSS and at-risk area showed low interobserver variability (≤0.09 [-0.3; 0.5] Pa and 1.1% [-7%; 9%], respectively). In control patients, WSS was stable over time (follow-up-baseline differences ≤0.02 Pa and 0.0%, respectively). Proximal aortic WSS decreased after AVR (n = 5; peak WSS difference ≤-0.41 Pa and at-risk area ≤-10%, P < .05 vs controls). WSS was increased after ARR in regions distal to the graft (peak WSS difference ≥0.16 Pa and at-risk area ≥4%, P < .05 vs AVR). Follow-up duration had no significant effects on these WSS changes, except when comparing ascending aortic peak WSS between ARR and AVR (P = .006). CONCLUSIONS: Serial perioperative 4D flow MRI investigations showed distinct patterns of postsurgical changes in aortic WSS, which included both reductions and translocations. Larger longitudinal studies are warranted to validate these findings with clinical outcomes and prediction of risk of future aortic events.
Authors: Loren F Hiratzka; George L Bakris; Joshua A Beckman; Robert M Bersin; Vincent F Carr; Donald E Casey; Kim A Eagle; Luke K Hermann; Eric M Isselbacher; Ella A Kazerooni; Nicholas T Kouchoukos; Bruce W Lytle; Dianna M Milewicz; David L Reich; Souvik Sen; Julie A Shinn; Lars G Svensson; David M Williams Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2010-04-06 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Patrick Horn; Daniel Stern; Verena Veulemans; Christian Heiss; Tobias Zeus; Marc W Merx; Malte Kelm; Ralf Westenfeld Journal: EuroIntervention Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 6.534
Authors: Gareth Crouch; Jayme Bennetts; Ajay Sinhal; Phillip J Tully; Darryl P Leong; Craig Bradbrook; Amy L Penhall; Carmine G De Pasquale; Adhiraj Chakrabarty; Robert A Baker; Joseph B Selvanayagam Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2014-10-17 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff; Ralf F Trauzeddel; Alex J Barker; Henriette Gruettner; Michael Markl; Jeanette Schulz-Menger Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2013-11-25 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Alessandro Della Corte; Simon C Body; Anna M Booher; Hans-Joachim Schaefers; Rita K Milewski; Hector I Michelena; Arturo Evangelista; Philippe Pibarot; Patrick Mathieu; Giuseppe Limongelli; Prem S Shekar; Sary F Aranki; Andrea Ballotta; Giuseppe Di Benedetto; Natzi Sakalihasan; Gianantonio Nappi; Kim A Eagle; Joseph E Bavaria; Alessandro Frigiola; Thoralf M Sundt Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2014-01-21 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: David G Guzzardi; Alex J Barker; Pim van Ooij; S Chris Malaisrie; Jyothy J Puthumana; Darrell D Belke; Holly E M Mewhort; Daniyil A Svystonyuk; Sean Kang; Subodh Verma; Jeremy Collins; James Carr; Robert O Bonow; Michael Markl; James D Thomas; Patrick M McCarthy; Paul W M Fedak Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2015-08-25 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Ethan M I Johnson; Mozziyar Etemadi; S Chris Malaisrie; Patrick M McCarthy; Michael Markl; Alex J Barker Journal: J Card Surg Date: 2019-10-15 Impact factor: 1.620
Authors: Emilie Bollache; Kristopher D Knott; Kelly Jarvis; Redha Boubertakh; Ryan Scott Dolan; Claudia Camaioni; Louise Collins; Paul Scully; Sydney Rabin; Thomas Treibel; James C Carr; Pim van Ooij; Jeremy D Collins; Julia Geiger; James C Moon; Alex J Barker; Steffen E Petersen; Michael Markl Journal: Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging Date: 2019-06-27
Authors: Ashitha Pathrose; Liliana Ma; Haben Berhane; Michael B Scott; Kelvin Chow; Christoph Forman; Ning Jin; Ali Serhal; Ryan Avery; James Carr; Michael Markl Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2020-10-26 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Erin E Crawford; Patrick M McCarthy; S Chris Malaisrie; Jyothy J Puthumana; Joshua D Robinson; Michael Markl; Menghan Liu; Adin-Cristian Andrei; David G Guzzardi; Jane Kruse; Paul W M Fedak Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2020-05-05 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Danielle D Massé; Jason A Shar; Kathleen N Brown; Sundeep G Keswani; K Jane Grande-Allen; Philippe Sucosky Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2018-09-13