Literature DB >> 32076666

Two-Minute k-Space and Time-accelerated Aortic Four-dimensional Flow MRI: Dual-Center Study of Feasibility and Impact on Velocity and Wall Shear Stress Quantification.

Emilie Bollache1, Kristopher D Knott1, Kelly Jarvis1, Redha Boubertakh1, Ryan Scott Dolan1, Claudia Camaioni1, Louise Collins1, Paul Scully1, Sydney Rabin1, Thomas Treibel1, James C Carr1, Pim van Ooij1, Jeremy D Collins1, Julia Geiger1, James C Moon1, Alex J Barker1, Steffen E Petersen1, Michael Markl1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the two-center feasibility of highly k-space and time (k-t)-accelerated 2-minute aortic four-dimensional (4D) flow MRI and to evaluate its performance for the quantification of velocities and wall shear stress (WSS).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study prospectively included 68 participants (center 1, 11 healthy volunteers [mean age ± standard deviation, 61 years ± 15] and 16 patients with aortic disease [mean age, 60 years ± 10]; center 2, 14 healthy volunteers [mean age, 38 years ± 13] and 27 patients with aortic or cardiac disease [mean age, 78 years ± 18]). Each participant underwent highly accelerated 4D flow MRI (k-t acceleration, acceleration factor of 5) of the thoracic aorta. For comparison, conventional 4D flow MRI (acceleration factor of 2) was acquired in the participants at center 1 (n = 27). Regional aortic peak systolic velocities and three-dimensional WSS were quantified.
RESULTS: k-t-accelerated scan times (center 1, 2:03 minutes ± 0:29; center 2, 2:06 minutes ± 0:20) were significantly reduced compared with conventional 4D flow MRI (center 1, 12:38 minutes ± 2:25; P < .0001). Overall good agreement was found between the two techniques (absolute differences ≤15%), but proximal aortic WSS was significantly underestimated in patients by using k-t-accelerated 4D flow when compared with conventional 4D flow (P ≤ .03). k-t-accelerated 4D flow MRI was reproducible (intra- and interobserver intraclass correlation coefficient ≥0.98) and identified significantly increased peak velocities and WSS in patients with stenotic (P ≤ .003) or bicuspid (P ≤ .04) aortic valves compared with healthy volunteers. In addition, k-t-accelerated 4D flow MRI-derived velocities and WSS were inversely related to age (r ≥-0.53; P ≤ .03) over all healthy volunteers.
CONCLUSION: k-t-accelerated aortic 4D flow MRI providing 2-minute scan times was feasible and reproducible at two centers. Although consistent healthy aging- and disease-related changes in aortic hemodynamics were observed, care should be taken when considering WSS, which can be underestimated in patients.© RSNA, 2019See also the commentary by François in this issue. 2019 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 32076666      PMCID: PMC6614912          DOI: 10.1148/ryct.2019180008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging        ISSN: 2638-6135


  43 in total

1.  Accelerating 4D flow MRI by exploiting low-rank matrix structure and hadamard sparsity.

Authors:  Giuseppe Valvano; Nicola Martini; Adrian Huber; Claudio Santelli; Christian Binter; Dante Chiappino; Luigi Landini; Sebastian Kozerke
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Volumetric arterial wall shear stress calculation based on cine phase contrast MRI.

Authors:  Wouter V Potters; Pim van Ooij; Henk Marquering; Ed vanBavel; Aart J Nederveen
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  A Bayesian approach for 4D flow imaging of aortic valve in a single breath-hold.

Authors:  Adam Rich; Lee C Potter; Ning Jin; Yingmin Liu; Orlando P Simonetti; Rizwan Ahmad
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Improved Semiautomated 4D Flow MRI Analysis in the Aorta in Patients With Congenital Aortic Valve Anomalies Versus Tricuspid Aortic Valves.

Authors:  Susanne Schnell; Pegah Entezari; Riti J Mahadewia; S Chris Malaisrie; Patrick M McCarthy; Jeremy D Collins; James Carr; Michael Markl
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  3D axial and circumferential wall shear stress from 4D flow MRI data using a finite element method and a laplacian approach.

Authors:  Julio Sotelo; Lydia Dux-Santoy; Andrea Guala; José Rodríguez-Palomares; Arturo Evangelista; Carlos Sing-Long; Jesús Urbina; Joaquín Mura; Daniel E Hurtado; Sergio Uribe
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Accelerated phase contrast MRI using hybrid one- and two-sided flow encodings only (HOTFEO).

Authors:  Da Wang; Aichi Chien; Jiaxin Shao; Fadil Abbas Ali; Peng Hu
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 4.044

7.  Quantification of thoracic blood flow using volumetric magnetic resonance imaging with radial velocity encoding: in vivo validation.

Authors:  Alex Frydrychowicz; Oliver Wieben; Eric Niespodzany; Scott B Reeder; Kevin M Johnson; Christopher J François
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  Finite element modelling of pulsatile blood flow in idealized model of human aortic arch: study of hypotension and hypertension.

Authors:  Paritosh Vasava; Payman Jalali; Mahsa Dabagh; Pertti J Kolari
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 2.238

9.  Cardiac 4D phase-contrast CMR at 9.4 T using self-gated ultra-short echo time (UTE) imaging.

Authors:  M Krämer; A G Motaal; K-H Herrmann; B Löffler; J R Reichenbach; G J Strijkers; V Hoerr
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 10.  4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement.

Authors:  Petter Dyverfeldt; Malenka Bissell; Alex J Barker; Ann F Bolger; Carl-Johan Carlhäll; Tino Ebbers; Christopher J Francios; Alex Frydrychowicz; Julia Geiger; Daniel Giese; Michael D Hope; Philip J Kilner; Sebastian Kozerke; Saul Myerson; Stefan Neubauer; Oliver Wieben; Michael Markl
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 5.364

View more
  4 in total

1.  How Well Does an Automated Approach Calculate and Visualize Blood Flow Vorticity at 4D Flow MRI?

Authors:  Michael Markl
Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging       Date:  2020-02-27

2.  Fast and Feasible: Two-Minute k-Space and Time-accelerated Aortic Four-dimensional Flow MRI.

Authors:  Christopher J François
Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging       Date:  2019-06-27

3.  Highly accelerated aortic 4D flow MRI using compressed sensing: Performance at different acceleration factors in patients with aortic disease.

Authors:  Ashitha Pathrose; Liliana Ma; Haben Berhane; Michael B Scott; Kelvin Chow; Christoph Forman; Ning Jin; Ali Serhal; Ryan Avery; James Carr; Michael Markl
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Influence of Spatial Resolution and Compressed SENSE Acceleration Factor on Flow Quantification with 4D Flow MRI at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Mariya S Pravdivtseva; Franziska Gaidzik; Philipp Berg; Patricia Ulloa; Naomi Larsen; Olav Jansen; Jan-Bernd Hövener; Mona Salehi Ravesh
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2022-02-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.