OBJECTIVES: Magnetic resonance (MRI) velocity mapping was used to evaluate non-invasively the flow profiles of the ascending aorta in normal volunteers and in patients with an aortic (mechanical) valve prosthesis. BACKGROUND: In patients with artificial aortic valves the flow profile in the ascending aorta is severely altered. These changes have been associated with an increased risk of thrombus formation and mechanical hemolysis. METHODS: Velocity profiles were determined 30 mm distal to the aortic valve in six healthy volunteers and seven patients with aortic valve replacement (replacement within the last 2 years) using ECG triggered phase contrast MRI. Peak flow, mean flow and mean reverse flow were measured in intervals of 25 ms during the entire heart cycle. Systolic reverse flow, end-systolic closing and diastolic leakage volume were calculated for all subjects. RESULTS: Peak flow velocity during mid-systole was significantly higher in patients with valvular prosthesis than in normals (mean + SD, 1.9 +/- 0.4 m/s vs. 1.2 +/- 0.03 m/s, P < 0.001) with a double peak and a zone of reversed flow close to the inner (left lateral) wall of the ascending aorta of the patients. Closing volume was significantly larger in patients than in controls (-3.3 +/- 1.2 ml/beat vs. -0.9 +/- 0.5 ml/beat; P < 0.001). There was reverse flow during systole in valvular patients amounting to 15.7 +/- 6.7% of total cardiac output compared to 2.3 +/- 1.2% in controls (P < 0.001). Diastolic mean flow was negative in patients after valve replacement but not in controls (-11.0 +/- 15.2 ml/beat vs. 6.8 +/- 3.2 ml/beat; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The following three major quantitative observations have been made in the present study: (1) Mechanical valve prostheses have an increased peak flow velocity with a systolic reverse flow at the inner (left lateral) wall of the ascending aorta. (2) A double peak flow velocity pattern can be observed in patients with bileaflet (mechanical) prosthesis. (3) The blood volume required for leaflet closure and the diastolic leakage blood volume are significantly higher for the examined bileaflet valve than for native heart valves.
OBJECTIVES: Magnetic resonance (MRI) velocity mapping was used to evaluate non-invasively the flow profiles of the ascending aorta in normal volunteers and in patients with an aortic (mechanical) valve prosthesis. BACKGROUND: In patients with artificial aortic valves the flow profile in the ascending aorta is severely altered. These changes have been associated with an increased risk of thrombus formation and mechanical hemolysis. METHODS: Velocity profiles were determined 30 mm distal to the aortic valve in six healthy volunteers and seven patients with aortic valve replacement (replacement within the last 2 years) using ECG triggered phase contrast MRI. Peak flow, mean flow and mean reverse flow were measured in intervals of 25 ms during the entire heart cycle. Systolic reverse flow, end-systolic closing and diastolic leakage volume were calculated for all subjects. RESULTS: Peak flow velocity during mid-systole was significantly higher in patients with valvular prosthesis than in normals (mean + SD, 1.9 +/- 0.4 m/s vs. 1.2 +/- 0.03 m/s, P < 0.001) with a double peak and a zone of reversed flow close to the inner (left lateral) wall of the ascending aorta of the patients. Closing volume was significantly larger in patients than in controls (-3.3 +/- 1.2 ml/beat vs. -0.9 +/- 0.5 ml/beat; P < 0.001). There was reverse flow during systole in valvularpatients amounting to 15.7 +/- 6.7% of total cardiac output compared to 2.3 +/- 1.2% in controls (P < 0.001). Diastolic mean flow was negative in patients after valve replacement but not in controls (-11.0 +/- 15.2 ml/beat vs. 6.8 +/- 3.2 ml/beat; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The following three major quantitative observations have been made in the present study: (1) Mechanical valve prostheses have an increased peak flow velocity with a systolic reverse flow at the inner (left lateral) wall of the ascending aorta. (2) A double peak flow velocity pattern can be observed in patients with bileaflet (mechanical) prosthesis. (3) The blood volume required for leaflet closure and the diastolic leakage blood volume are significantly higher for the examined bileaflet valve than for native heart valves.
Authors: J M Hasenkam; E M Pedersen; J H Ostergaard; H Nygaard; P K Paulsen; G Johannsen; B A Schurizek Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 1988-07 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: H Nygaard; P K Paulsen; J M Hasenkam; O Kromann-Hansen; E M Pedersen; P E Rovsing Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 1992 Impact factor: 4.191
Authors: Emilie Bollache; Paul W M Fedak; Pim van Ooij; Ozair Rahman; S Chris Malaisrie; Patrick M McCarthy; James C Carr; Alex Powell; Jeremy D Collins; Michael Markl; Alex J Barker Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2017-11-16 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Yeonyee E Yoon; Yoo Jin Hong; Hyung-Kwan Kim; Jeong A Kim; Jin Oh Na; Dong Hyun Yang; Young Jin Kim; Eui-Young Choi Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2014-11-07 Impact factor: 3.500
Authors: Yeonyee E Yoon; Yoo Jin Hong; Hyung-Kwan Kim; Jeong A Kim; Jin Oh Na; Dong Hyun Yang; Young Jin Kim; Eui-Young Choi Journal: Korean Circ J Date: 2014-11-25 Impact factor: 3.243
Authors: Nynke H M Kooistra; Freek Nijhoff; Masieh Abawi; Pierfrancesco Agostoni; Daniël M Araya Roos; Sjoerd van Tuijl; Niels Blanken; Michiel Voskuil; Pieter A F M Doevendans; Pieter R Stella; Tim Leiner Journal: J Cardiovasc Transl Res Date: 2019-03-15 Impact factor: 4.132