Literature DB >> 8652159

Limitations in the use of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in objective audiometry as the result of fine structure.

J Heitmann1, B Waldmann, P K Plinkert.   

Abstract

There is strong evidence for a link between intact cochlear function and otoacoustic emissions (OAE). However, all attempts to find a close correlation between auditory thresholds and amplitudes of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) have failed. As an explanation for these findings, we have studied DPOAE fine structure and its dependence on increasing primary sound levels. Errors due to different calibrations of equipment for measuring DPOAE and auditory thresholds were also investigated. DPOAE were measured in 16 subjects using a frequency range of 500-1000 Hz. Frequencies were changed in 12.5 Hz steps at primary levels of 55, 60, 65 and 70 dB SPL. DPOAE amplitudes were found to vary by up to 20 dB for a frequency step of 50 Hz. Some fine structures showed narrow dips that shifted in frequency and diminished in amplitude with increasing primary levels. These findings demonstrated that sampling DPOAE amplitudes at widely spaced frequencies gave incomplete information about true course. DPOAE growth functions measured close to a dip in the DPOAE fine structure were rendered useless by interference with either the frequency shift or amplitude variations of the dip at different primary levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8652159     DOI: 10.1007/bf00615115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  14 in total

1.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Values for clinical use.

Authors:  P Bonfils; P Avan
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1992-10

2.  The behavior of the acoustic distortion product, 2f1-f2, from the human ear and its relation to auditory sensitivity.

Authors:  S A Gaskill; A M Brown
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Clinical applications of otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  B L Lonsbury-Martin; M L Whitehead; G K Martin
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1991-10

4.  The evoked cochlear mechanical response and the auditory microstructure - evidence for a new element in cochlear mechanics.

Authors:  D T Kemp
Journal:  Scand Audiol Suppl       Date:  1979

5.  The microstructure of quiet and masked thresholds.

Authors:  G R Long
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system.

Authors:  D T Kemp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Quantitative assessment of human cochlear function by evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  P Avan; P Bonfils; D Loth; P Narcy; J Trotoux
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  [Early detection of cisplatin-induced ototoxicity using evoked otoacoustic emissions].

Authors:  P K Plinkert; S Kröber
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 1.057

9.  Fine structure of the 2f1-f2 acoustic distortion product: changes with primary level.

Authors:  N J He; R A Schmiedt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Otoacoustic emissions from normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects: distortion product responses.

Authors:  M P Gorga; S T Neely; B Bergman; K L Beauchaine; J R Kaminski; J Peters; W Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  7 in total

1.  Reducing reflected contributions to ear-canal distortion product otoacoustic emissions in humans.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Stephen T Neely; Judy G Kopun; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions: cochlear-source contributions and clinical test performance.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Stephen T Neely; Judy G Kopun; Darcia M Dierking; Hongyang Tan; Connie Converse; Elizabeth Kennedy; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Considering distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure in measurements of the medial olivocochlear reflex.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Srikanta K Mishra; Tracy L Williams
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Optimizing Clinical Interpretation of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Infants.

Authors:  Chelsea M Blankenship; Lisa L Hunter; Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; David K Brown; Annie McCune; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Li Lin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 5.  [Update: blast and explosion trauma].

Authors:  P S van de Weyer; M Praetorius; M Tisch
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Screening for Early Stages of High-frequency Hearing Loss in Adolescents.

Authors:  Danique E Paping; Marc van der Schroef; Hiske W Helleman; André Goedegebure; Rob J Baatenburg de Jong; Jantien L Vroegop
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2022 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.293

7.  Fine structure of distortion product otoacoustic emissions: its dependence on age and hearing threshold and clinical implications.

Authors:  Wolfgang Wagner; Peter K Plinkert; Reinhard Vonthein; Stefan K Plontke
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 2.503

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.