Literature DB >> 2920497

Adaptive control of etoposide administration: impact of interpatient pharmacodynamic variability.

M J Ratain1, R L Schilsky, K E Choi, C Guarnieri, D Grimmer, N J Vogelzang, E Senekjian, M A Liebner.   

Abstract

We sought to use a previously derived pharmacodynamic model for 72-hour etoposide infusions to adaptively control administration of this agent and to demonstrate that more predictable toxicity could be obtained with this dosing scheme. A randomized crossover study design was used to compare "standard" dosing (125 mg/m2/day) to adaptive control, with dose adjustment at 28 hours based on the 24-hour plasma level. A total of 31 patients received 86 cycles of chemotherapy, 36 by standard dosing and 50 by adaptive control. However, there was no demonstrable advantage to the adaptive control scheme, because of apparent bias of the previous model. A new model was proposed that also included serum albumin, performance status, and prior RBC transfusions as measures of interpatient pharmacodynamic variability. We conclude that adaptive control dosing of etoposide is feasible but that the therapy must be individualized for both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2920497     DOI: 10.1038/clpt.1989.22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0009-9236            Impact factor:   6.875


  18 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetically guided administration of chemotherapeutic agents.

Authors:  H J van den Bongard; R A Mathôt; J H Beijnen; J H Schellens
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Body surface area as a determinant of pharmacokinetics and drug dosing.

Authors:  M Sawyer; M J Ratain
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 3.  Mechanistic models for myelosuppression.

Authors:  Lena E Friberg; Mats O Karlsson
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 4.  Individualised cancer chemotherapy: strategies and performance of prospective studies on therapeutic drug monitoring with dose adaptation: a review.

Authors:  Milly E de Jonge; Alwin D R Huitema; Jan H M Schellens; Sjoerd Rodenhuis; Jos H Beijnen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  A limited sampling method for estimation of the etoposide area under the curve.

Authors:  A S Strömgren; B T Sørensen; P Jakobsen; A Jakobsen
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  Clinical pharmacodynamics of continuous-infusion etoposide.

Authors:  A A Miller; C F Stewart; E A Tolley
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 7.  Adaptive control methods for the dose individualisation of anticancer agents.

Authors:  A Rousseau; P Marquet; J Debord; C Sabot; G Lachâtre
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 8.  Limited-sampling models for anticancer agents.

Authors:  L J van Warmerdam; W W ten Bokkel Huinink; R A Maes; J H Beijnen
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 9.  Pharmacokinetic optimisation of anticancer therapy.

Authors:  J Liliemark; C Peterson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 10.  Practical treatment guide for dose individualisation in cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  P Canal; E Chatelut; S Guichard
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.