Literature DB >> 1764871

Pharmacokinetic optimisation of anticancer therapy.

J Liliemark1, C Peterson.   

Abstract

It is obvious that there are great problems with pharmacokinetic individualization of anticancer therapy. The strong relationship between dose intensity (total dose/unit time) and response revealed in clinical trials with some tumours provides a strong support for studies seeking relationships between the individual plasma pharmacokinetic profile and response to treatment. Unfortunately, studies that define a therapeutic window are sparse, and trials that prospectively test such models are even rarer. Thus, for most cancer drugs, it is not possible to give any definite advice on how to use pharmacokinetic determinations to establish individualised therapy, and there is therefore a definite need for such studies. It is important, however, that attempts to establish relationships between drug concentrations and therapeutic effects be founded on a sound theoretical base. When drugs, mainly antimetabolites, are extensively metabolised intracellularly and interact with intracellular processes about which there are data showing a strong interindividual heterogeneity, such data must be considered when designing pharmacokinetic investigations. Cytarabine and fluorouracil are good examples of this. The monitoring of intracellular drug/metabolite concentrations or of the direct biochemical events in the tumour cells seems to be a promising approach with such drugs. It also needs to be emphasised that pharmacokinetically guided individualization cannot be achieved before a therapeutic window is established, i.e. a knowledge of the relationship between drug concentration and clinical effects. The investigators in this field accept a great responsibility when clinical studies are undertaken: a poorly designed study showing no benefit from pharmacokinetically guided individualization can impair the possibilities of performing more adequate studies in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1764871     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-199121030-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  89 in total

1.  Is dose normalization to weight or body surface area useful in adults?

Authors:  L B Grochow; C Baraldi; D Noe
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1990-02-21       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Continuous infusion high-dose cytosine arabinoside without anthracyclines as induction and intensification therapy in adults under age 50 with newly diagnosed acute myelogenous leukemia.

Authors:  E Estey; M J Keating; W Plunkett; K B McCredie; E J Freireich
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 4.929

3.  Interpatient and intrapatient variability in vinblastine pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  M J Ratain; N J Vogelzang; J A Sinkule
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Combination chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced Hodgkin's disease.

Authors:  V T Devita; A A Serpick; P P Carbone
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1970-12       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Dose versus pharmacokinetics for predicting tolerance to 5-day continuous infusion of 5-FU.

Authors:  G Milano; P Roman; R Khater; M Frenay; N Renee; M Namer
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1988-04-15       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Maintenance chemotherapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: better in the evening.

Authors:  G E Rivard; C Infante-Rivard; C Hoyoux; J Champagne
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-12-07       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  High-dose cisplatin treatment: hearing loss and plasma concentrations.

Authors:  G Laurell; U Jungnelius
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Increasing the accumulation of daunorubicin in human leukemic cells by prolonging the infusion time.

Authors:  C Paul; U Tidefelt; J Liliemark; C Peterson
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.156

9.  ara-C in plasma and ara-CTP in leukemic cells after subcutaneous injection and continuous intravenous infusion of ara-C in patients with acute nonlymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  J O Liliemark; G Gahrton; C Y Paul; C O Peterson
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 4.929

10.  In vitro drug testing in patients with acute leukemia with incubations mimicking in vivo intracellular drug concentrations.

Authors:  U Tidefelt; B Sundman-Engberg; A S Rhedin; C Paul
Journal:  Eur J Haematol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.997

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Individualised cancer chemotherapy: strategies and performance of prospective studies on therapeutic drug monitoring with dose adaptation: a review.

Authors:  Milly E de Jonge; Alwin D R Huitema; Jan H M Schellens; Sjoerd Rodenhuis; Jos H Beijnen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Population pharmacokinetics of the BEACOPP polychemotherapy regimen in Hodgkin's lymphoma and its effect on myelotoxicity.

Authors:  Stefan Wilde; Alexander Jetter; Stephan Rietbrock; Dirk Kasel; Andreas Engert; Andreas Josting; Beate Klimm; Georg Hempel; Stefanie Reif; Ulrich Jaehde; Ute Merkel; Dagmar Busse; Matthias Schwab; Volker Diehl; Uwe Fuhr
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Clinical pharmacokinetics and dose optimisation of carboplatin.

Authors:  S B Duffull; B A Robinson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Pharmacokinetic optimisation of antiretroviral therapy in patients with HIV infection.

Authors:  B N Stretcher
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 5.  Limited-sampling models for anticancer agents.

Authors:  L J van Warmerdam; W W ten Bokkel Huinink; R A Maes; J H Beijnen
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 6.  The efficiency concept in pharmacodynamics.

Authors:  G Alván; G Paintaud; M Wakelkamp
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 7.  Risk factors determining chemotherapeutic toxicity in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  F G Jansman; D T Sleijfer; J L Coenen; J C De Graaf; J R Brouwers
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Growth kinetics of L1210 leukemic cells exposed to different concentration courses of methotrexate in vitro.

Authors:  S Gimmel; H R Maurer
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.333

9.  Evaluation of methotrexate tissue exposure by in situ microdialysis in a rat model.

Authors:  O Ekstrøm; A Andersen; D J Warren; K E Giercksky; L Slørdal
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.333

10.  Pharmacokinetics of zidovudine phosphorylation in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus.

Authors:  B N Stretcher; A J Pesce; P T Frame; D S Stein
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.