Literature DB >> 15656695

Individualised cancer chemotherapy: strategies and performance of prospective studies on therapeutic drug monitoring with dose adaptation: a review.

Milly E de Jonge1, Alwin D R Huitema, Jan H M Schellens, Sjoerd Rodenhuis, Jos H Beijnen.   

Abstract

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is increasingly used in clinical practice for the optimisation of drug treatment. Although pharmacokinetic variability is an established factor involved in the variation of therapeutic outcome of many chemotherapeutic agents, the use of TDM in the field of oncology has been limited thus far. An important reason for this is that a therapeutic index for most anticancer agents has not been established; however, in the last 20 years, relationships between plasma drug concentrations and clinical outcome have been defined for various chemotherapeutic agents. Several attempts have been made to use these relationships for optimising the administration of chemotherapeutics by applying pharmacokinetically guided dosage. These prospective studies, individualising chemotherapy dose during therapy based on measured drug concentrations, are discussed in this review. We focus on the way a target value is defined, the methodologies used for dose adaptation and the way the performance of the dose-adaptation approach is evaluated. Furthermore, attention is paid to the results of the studies and the applicability of the strategies in clinical practice. It can be concluded that TDM may contribute to improving cancer chemotherapy in terms of patient outcome and survival and should therefore be further investigated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15656695     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200544020-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  90 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetically guided administration of chemotherapeutic agents.

Authors:  H J van den Bongard; R A Mathôt; J H Beijnen; J H Schellens
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Therapeutic monitoring of continuous infusion etoposide in small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  S P Joel; P Ellis; K O'Byrne; D Papamichael; M Hall; R Penson; S Nicholls; C O'Donnell; A Constantinou; J Woodhull; M Nicholson; I Smith; D Talbot; M Slevin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Methodological issues in pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling.

Authors:  E Bellissant; V Sébille; G Paintaud
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Conventional compared with individualized chemotherapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  W E Evans; M V Relling; J H Rodman; W R Crom; J M Boyett; C H Pui
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-02-19       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  A Bayesian dosing method for carboplatin given by continuous infusion for 120 h.

Authors:  P Guillet; S Monjanel; A Nicoara; F Duffaud; B Lacarelle; D Bagarry-Liegey; A Durand; J Catalin; R Favre
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  Reappraisal of some dosage adjustment guidelines.

Authors:  A Sulkes; J M Collins
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1987-03

8.  Tailored fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide compared with marrow-supported high-dose chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment for high-risk breast cancer: a randomised trial. Scandinavian Breast Group 9401 study.

Authors:  J Bergh; T Wiklund; B Erikstein; E Lidbrink; H Lindman; P Malmström; P Kellokumpu-Lehtinen; N O Bengtsson; G Söderlund; G Anker; E Wist; S Ottosson; E Salminen; P Ljungman; H Holte; J Nilsson; C Blomqvist; N Wilking
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-10-21       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 9.  Therapeutic drug monitoring in oncology. Problems and potential in antineoplastic therapy.

Authors:  M J Moore; C Erlichman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 10.  Pharmacokinetic optimisation of cancer chemotherapy. Effect on outcomes.

Authors:  E Masson; W C Zamboni
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 6.447

View more
  28 in total

Review 1.  Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics for treatment optimization in clinical oncology.

Authors:  Anthe S Zandvliet; Jan H M Schellens; Jos H Beijnen; Alwin D R Huitema
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Individualized dosing of oral targeted therapies in oncology is crucial in the era of precision medicine.

Authors:  Stefanie L Groenland; Ron H J Mathijssen; Jos H Beijnen; Alwin D R Huitema; Neeltje Steeghs
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Therapeutic drug monitoring of imatinib: Bayesian and alternative methods to predict trough levels.

Authors:  Verena Gotta; Nicolas Widmer; Michael Montemurro; Serge Leyvraz; Amina Haouala; Laurent A Decosterd; Chantal Csajka; Thierry Buclin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Practical guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring of anticancer tyrosine kinase inhibitors: focus on the pharmacokinetic targets.

Authors:  Huixin Yu; Neeltje Steeghs; Cynthia M Nijenhuis; Jan H M Schellens; Jos H Beijnen; Alwin D R Huitema
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Therapeutic drug monitoring and tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Authors:  Pauline Herviou; Emilie Thivat; Damien Richard; Lucie Roche; Joyce Dohou; Mélanie Pouget; Alain Eschalier; Xavier Durando; Nicolas Authier
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 6.  Genetic polymorphisms of drug-metabolising enzymes and drug transporters in the chemotherapeutic treatment of cancer.

Authors:  Tessa M Bosch; Irma Meijerman; Jos H Beijnen; Jan H M Schellens
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Model-based approach to early predict prolonged high grade neutropenia in carboplatin-treated patients and guide G-CSF prophylactic treatment.

Authors:  Mélanie L Pastor; Céline M Laffont; Laurence Gladieff; Etienne Chatelut; Didier Concordet
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 4.200

8.  Relationship of glutathione S-transferase genotypes with side-effects of pulsed cyclophosphamide therapy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Shilong Zhong; Min Huang; Xiuyan Yang; Liuqin Liang; Yixi Wang; Marjorie Romkes; Wei Duan; Eli Chan; Shu-Feng Zhou
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Analyses of 5-Fluorouracil in East-Asian Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yuxiang Ma; Yuehao Lin; Benyan Zou; Wanli Liu; Yang Zhang; Liping Zhao; Yan Huang; Yunpeng Yang; Wenfeng Fang; Yuanyuan Zhao; Jin Sheng; Tao Qin; Zhihuang Hu; Salavatore J Salamone; Yunying Li; Li Zhang; Hongyun Zhao
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 10.  Breath tests to phenotype drug disposition in oncology.

Authors:  Frans L Opdam; Anil S Modak; Hans Gelderblom; Henk-Jan Guchelaar
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 6.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.