Literature DB >> 11392451

Body surface area as a determinant of pharmacokinetics and drug dosing.

M Sawyer1, M J Ratain.   

Abstract

Body surface area (BSA) was introduced into medical oncology in order to derive a safe starting dose for phase I studies of anticancer drugs from preclinical animal toxicology data. It is not clear however, as to why dosing by BSA was extended to the routine dosing of antineoplastic agents. Several formulas exist to estimate BSA, but the formula derived by DuBois and DuBois is the one used in adult medical oncology. This formula was derived based on data from only nine patients; subsequent attempts to validate the formula have found the DuBois formula to either over or underestimate the actual determined BSA. While cardiac output does correlate with BSA, the relationship between BSA and other physiologic measures relevant for drug metabolism and disposition, such as, renal and hepatic function, is weak or nonexistent. Further only epirubicin, etoposide, and carboplatin have been studied to determine if dosing by BSA would reduce interpatient variability, and none of these drugs were found to have significant relationships between their pharmacokinetics and BSA. Future clinical trials of new agents should not presume that dosing based on BSA reduces interpatient variability. Studies should examine the role, if any, BSA has in dosing new chemotherapeutic agents in initial phase I studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11392451     DOI: 10.1023/a:1010639201787

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest New Drugs        ISSN: 0167-6997            Impact factor:   3.850


  35 in total

1.  A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. 1916.

Authors:  D Du Bois; E F Du Bois
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.008

2.  STUDIES OF KIDNEY FUNCTION IN CHILDREN: I. Urea Clearance Values: (1) No Evidence of Kidney Disease (2) After Acute Hematuric Nephritis Following an Acute Infection (3) in the Acute Stage of Hematuric Nephritis.

Authors:  G E Cullen; W E Nelson; F E Holmes
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1935-09       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Pharmacologically based dosing of etoposide: a means of safely increasing dose intensity.

Authors:  M J Ratain; R Mick; R L Schilsky; N J Vogelzang; F Berezin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Is dose normalization to weight or body surface area useful in adults?

Authors:  L B Grochow; C Baraldi; D Noe
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1990-02-21       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Stroke volume and cardiac output in normotensive children and adults. Assessment of relations with body size and impact of overweight.

Authors:  G de Simone; R B Devereux; S R Daniels; G Mureddu; M J Roman; T R Kimball; R Greco; S Witt; F Contaldo
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1997-04-01       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Adaptive control of etoposide administration: impact of interpatient pharmacodynamic variability.

Authors:  M J Ratain; R L Schilsky; K E Choi; C Guarnieri; D Grimmer; N J Vogelzang; E Senekjian; M A Liebner
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 6.875

7.  Human surface area: comparison of the Du Bois formula with direct photometric measurement.

Authors:  D Mitchell; N B Strydom; C H van Graan; W H van der Walt
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 3.657

8.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of long-term continuous-infusion doxorubicin.

Authors:  S P Ackland; M J Ratain; N J Vogelzang; K E Choi; M Ruane; J A Sinkule
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 6.875

9.  Effects of demographic variables on vorozole pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers and in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  V K Piotrovsky; M L Huang; A Van Peer; C Langenaecken
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.333

10.  What is the effect of adjusting epirubicin doses for body surface area?

Authors:  N A Dobbs; C J Twelves
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  48 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic integration in drug development and dosage-regimen optimization for veterinary medicine.

Authors:  Pierre-Louis Toutain
Journal:  AAPS PharmSci       Date:  2002

2.  Prescribing oral chemotherapy.

Authors:  Sandeep D Parsad; Mark J Ratain
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-02-24

3.  Metabolic and neurologic consequences of chronic lopinavir/ritonavir administration to C57BL/6 mice.

Authors:  Paul J Pistell; Sunita Gupta; Alecia G Knight; Michelle Domingue; Romina M Uranga; Donald K Ingram; Indu Kheterpal; Carmen Ruiz; Jeffrey N Keller; Annadora J Bruce-Keller
Journal:  Antiviral Res       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 5.970

4.  Relationship between diverse patient body size- and image acquisition-related factors, and quantitative and qualitative image quality in coronary computed tomography angiography: a multicenter observational study.

Authors:  Daisuke Utsunomiya; Ryoichi Tanaka; Kunihiro Yoshioka; Kazuo Awai; Teruhito Mochizuki; Naofumi Matsunaga; Tomoaki Ichikawa; Masayuki Kanematsu; Tonsok Kim; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  Dose standardisation of anticancer drugs.

Authors:  Anne-Lise Pouliquen; Laurence Escalup; Nathalie Jourdan; Paul Cottu; Pierre Faure; Isabelle Madelaine-Chambrin
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2011-01-14

6.  Comparative Toxicity by Sex Among Children Treated for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Kathleen A Meeske; Lingyun Ji; David R Freyer; Paul Gaynon; Kathleen Ruccione; Anna Butturini; Vassilios I Avramis; Stuart Siegel; Yousif Matloub; Nita L Seibel; Richard Sposto
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.167

7.  Factors affecting the pharmacokinetic profile of MS-275, a novel histone deacetylase inhibitor, in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Milin R Acharya; Judith E Karp; Edward A Sausville; Kyunghwa Hwang; Qin Ryan; Ivana Gojo; Jurgen Venitz; William D Figg; Alex Sparreboom
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.850

8.  Fixed-dose capecitabine is feasible: results from a pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic study in metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Michelle A Rudek; Roisin M Connolly; Janelle M Hoskins; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Stacie C Jeter; Deborah K Armstrong; John H Fetting; Vered Stearns; Laurie A Wright; Ming Zhao; Stanley P Watkins; Howard L McLeod; Nancy E Davidson; Antonio C Wolff
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Population-based input function and image-derived input function for [¹¹C](R)-rolipram PET imaging: methodology, validation and application to the study of major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Paolo Zanotti-Fregonara; Christina S Hines; Sami S Zoghbi; Jeih-San Liow; Yi Zhang; Victor W Pike; Wayne C Drevets; Alan G Mallinger; Carlos A Zarate; Masahiro Fujita; Robert B Innis
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  The average body surface area of adult cancer patients in the UK: a multicentre retrospective study.

Authors:  Joseph J Sacco; Joanne Botten; Fergus Macbeth; Adrian Bagust; Peter Clark
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.