Literature DB >> 11108434

Pharmacokinetically guided administration of chemotherapeutic agents.

H J van den Bongard1, R A Mathôt, J H Beijnen, J H Schellens.   

Abstract

The current practice for the dose calculation of most anticancer agents is based on body surface area in m2, although lower interpatient variation in pharmacokinetic parameters has been reported with pharmacokinetically guided administration. As chemotherapeutic agents have a narrow therapeutic window, pharmacokinetically guided administration may lead to less toxicity and higher efficacy than administration on the basis of body surface area. Pharmacokinetically guided administration, using parameters such as area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), steady-state plasma drug concentration and drug exposure time above a certain plasma concentration, has been studied for many antineoplastic agents. Assessment of pharmacokinetic profiles allows the characterisation of relationships between pharmacokinetic parameters and efficacy and toxicity. AUC appears to be more closely correlated with pharmacodynamics than does the dose per unit of body surface area. In particular, the AUC-guided administration of carboplatin has been extensively studied, based on the close relationship between the renal clearance of the drug and glomerular filtration rate. Several formulae and limited sampling models have been derived to predict the AUC of carboplatin. The relationship between AUC and pharmacodynamics has also been studied for other anticancer agents, for example fluorouracil, topotecan, etoposide, cisplatin and busulfan, but all less extensively than for carboplatin. The pharmacokinetically guided administration of these agents needs to be investigated further before the use of alternative administration formulae can become standard clinical practice. Prospective studies of pharmacokinetically guided versus surface area-based administration should be performed to validate pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships and to facilitate optimal dosage of anticancer agents in the clinic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11108434     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200039050-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  163 in total

1.  Validation of a limited sampling model for carboplatin in a high-dose chemotherapy combination.

Authors:  L J van Warmerdam; S Rodenhuis; O van Tellingen; R A Maes; J H Beijnen
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.333

2.  Conventional compared with individualized chemotherapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  W E Evans; M V Relling; J H Rodman; W R Crom; J M Boyett; C H Pui
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-02-19       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Pharmacokinetics and cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  P Workman; M A Graham
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Phase I trial, including pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic correlations, of combination paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  C P Belani; C M Kearns; E G Zuhowski; K Erkmen; D Hiponia; D Zacharski; C Engstrom; R K Ramanathan; M J Capozzoli; J Aisner; M J Egorin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Carboxypeptidase-G2, thymidine, and leucovorin rescue in cancer patients with methotrexate-induced renal dysfunction.

Authors:  B C Widemann; F M Balis; R F Murphy; J M Sorensen; M J Montello; M O'Brien; P C Adamson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Limited sampling models for topotecan pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  L J van Warmerdam; J Verweij; H Rosing; J H Schellens; R A Maes; J H Beijnen
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide plus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor: a phase I study with apparent activity in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  R L Krigel; C S Palackdharry; K Padavic; N Haas; D Kilpatrick; C Langer; R Comis
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Phase II study of 4'-iodo-4'-deoxydoxorubicin in non-resectable non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  J B Sørensen; L Stenbygaard; L Drivsholm; P Dombernowsky; H H Hansen
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.333

9.  Phase I clinical and pharmacological study of thymidine (NSC 21548) and cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) in patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  R L Schilsky; K O'Laughlin; M J Ratain
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis of fluorouracil during 72-hour continuous infusion with and without dipyridamole.

Authors:  D L Trump; M J Egorin; A Forrest; J K Willson; S Remick; K D Tutsch
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacology of anticancer drugs in the elderly population.

Authors:  Hans Wildiers; Martin S Highley; Ernst A de Bruijn; Allan T van Oosterom
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Development and validation of limited sampling strategies for prediction of the systemic exposure to the novel anticancer agent E7070 (N-(3-chloro-7-indolyl)-1,4-benzenedisulphonamide).

Authors:  Charlotte van Kesteren; R A A Mathôt; E Raymond; J P Armand; P Fumoleau; C Punt; M Ravic; J Wanders; J H Beijnen; J H M Schellens
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic guided trial design in oncology.

Authors:  Ch van Kesteren; R A A Mathôt; J H Beijnen; J H M Schellens
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 4.  Individualised cancer chemotherapy: strategies and performance of prospective studies on therapeutic drug monitoring with dose adaptation: a review.

Authors:  Milly E de Jonge; Alwin D R Huitema; Jan H M Schellens; Sjoerd Rodenhuis; Jos H Beijnen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Population pharmacokinetics of the BEACOPP polychemotherapy regimen in Hodgkin's lymphoma and its effect on myelotoxicity.

Authors:  Stefan Wilde; Alexander Jetter; Stephan Rietbrock; Dirk Kasel; Andreas Engert; Andreas Josting; Beate Klimm; Georg Hempel; Stefanie Reif; Ulrich Jaehde; Ute Merkel; Dagmar Busse; Matthias Schwab; Volker Diehl; Uwe Fuhr
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Development of a limited-sampling model for prediction of doxorubicin exposure in dogs.

Authors:  L A Wittenburg; D H Thamm; D L Gustafson
Journal:  Vet Comp Oncol       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 2.613

Review 7.  Genetic polymorphisms of drug-metabolising enzymes and drug transporters in the chemotherapeutic treatment of cancer.

Authors:  Tessa M Bosch; Irma Meijerman; Jos H Beijnen; Jan H M Schellens
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 8.  The Valley of Death in anticancer drug development: a reassessment.

Authors:  David J Adams
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 14.819

9.  Effects of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy on the frequency and function of regulatory T cells in patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Patrick J Schuler; Malgorzata Harasymczuk; Bastian Schilling; Zenichiro Saze; Laura Strauss; Stephan Lang; Jonas T Johnson; Theresa L Whiteside
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 10.  A systematic review of limited sampling strategies for platinum agents used in cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  Gabriel W Loh; Lillian S L Ting; Mary H H Ensom
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.