Literature DB >> 20507828

Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection.

Jan Theeuwes1.   

Abstract

The present paper argues for the notion that when attention is spread across the visual field in the first sweep of information through the brain visual selection is completely stimulus-driven. Only later in time, through recurrent feedback processing, volitional control based on expectancy and goal set will bias visual selection in a top-down manner. Here we review behavioral evidence as well as evidence from ERP, fMRI, TMS and single cell recording consistent with stimulus-driven selection. Alternative viewpoints that assume a large role for top-down processing are discussed. It is argued that in most cases evidence supporting top-down control on visual selection in fact demonstrates top-down control on processes occurring later in time, following initial selection. We conclude that top-down knowledge regarding non-spatial features of the objects cannot alter the initial selection priority. Only by adjusting the size of the attentional window, the initial sweep of information through the brain may be altered in a top-down way.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20507828     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  281 in total

1.  Experience-dependent attentional tuning of distractor rejection.

Authors:  Daniel B Vatterott; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

2.  Exogenous attention to facial vs non-facial emotional visual stimuli.

Authors:  Luis Carretié; Dominique Kessel; Alejandra Carboni; Sara López-Martín; Jacobo Albert; Manuel Tapia; Francisco Mercado; Almudena Capilla; José A Hinojosa
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  How the speed of motor-response decisions, but not focal-attentional selection, differs as a function of task set and target prevalence.

Authors:  Thomas Töllner; Dragan Rangelov; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Visuospatial cueing by self-caused features: Orienting of attention and action-outcome associative learning.

Authors:  Davood G Gozli; Hira Aslam; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

5.  Oculomotor capture by stimuli that signal the availability of reward.

Authors:  Michel Failing; Tom Nissens; Daniel Pearson; Mike Le Pelley; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Activation of context-specific attentional control sets by exogenous allocation of visual attention to the context?

Authors:  Caroline Gottschalk; Rico Fischer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-02-05

7.  The boundary conditions of priming of visual search: from passive viewing through task-relevant working memory load.

Authors:  Arni Kristjánsson; Styrmir Saevarsson; Jon Driver
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-06

8.  Positive emotion broadens attention focus through decreased position-specific spatial encoding in early visual cortex: evidence from ERPs.

Authors:  Naomi Vanlessen; Valentina Rossi; Rudi De Raedt; Gilles Pourtois
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Directing driver attention with augmented reality cues.

Authors:  Michelle L Rusch; Mark C Schall; Patrick Gavin; John D Lee; Jeffrey D Dawson; Shaun Vecera; Matthew Rizzo
Journal:  Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav       Date:  2013-01

10.  Reward elicits cognitive control over emotional distraction: Evidence from pupillometry.

Authors:  Amy T Walsh; David Carmel; Gina M Grimshaw
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.282

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.