Literature DB >> 21861683

Attentional capture by salient distractors during visual search is determined by temporal task demands.

Monika Kiss1, Anna Grubert, Anders Petersen, Martin Eimer.   

Abstract

The question whether attentional capture by salient but task-irrelevant visual stimuli is triggered in a bottom-up fashion or depends on top-down task settings is still unresolved. Strong support for bottom-up capture was obtained in the additional singleton task, in which search arrays were visible until response onset. Equally strong evidence for top-down control of attentional capture was obtained in spatial cueing experiments in which display durations were very brief. To demonstrate the critical role of temporal task demands on salience-driven attentional capture, we measured ERP indicators of capture by task-irrelevant color singletons in search arrays that could also contain a shape target. In Experiment 1, all displays were visible until response onset. In Experiment 2, display duration was limited to 200 msec. With long display durations, color singleton distractors elicited an N2pc component that was followed by a late Pd component, suggesting that they triggered attentional capture, which was later replaced by location-specific inhibition. When search arrays were visible for only 200 msec, the distractor-elicited N2pc was eliminated and was replaced by a Pd component in the same time range, indicative of rapid suppression of capture. Results show that attentional capture by salient distractors can be inhibited for short-duration search displays, in which it would interfere with target processing. They demonstrate that salience-driven capture is not a purely bottom-up phenomenon but is subject to top-down control.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21861683     DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  27 in total

1.  Opposing effects of stimulus-driven and memory-driven attention in visual search.

Authors:  Koeun Jung; Suk Won Han; Yoonki Min
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-02

2.  The success of the representation maintenance affects the memory-guided search processing: an ERP study.

Authors:  Min Wang; Ping Yang; Zhenlan Jin; Junjun Zhang; Ling Li
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  A meta-analysis of contingent-capture effects.

Authors:  Christian Büsel; Martin Voracek; Ulrich Ansorge
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-08-31

4.  Early information processing contributions to object individuation revealed by perception of illusory figures.

Authors:  Claire K Naughtin; Jason B Mattingley; Paul E Dux
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Opposing effects of memory-driven and stimulus-driven attention on distractor perception.

Authors:  Suk Won Han
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2017-09-04

6.  Neural Evidence for the Contribution of Active Suppression During Working Memory Filtering.

Authors:  Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 7.  Inhibition as a potential resolution to the attentional capture debate.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2018-10-29

8.  Active suppression after involuntary capture of attention.

Authors:  Risa Sawaki; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-04

Review 9.  The Role of Inhibition in Avoiding Distraction by Salient Stimuli.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  The effects of stimulus-driven competition and task set on involuntary attention.

Authors:  Suk Won Han; René Marois
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.