Literature DB >> 23025581

Context-dependent control over attentional capture.

Joshua D Cosman1, Shaun P Vecera.   

Abstract

A number of studies have demonstrated that the likelihood of a salient item capturing attention is dependent on the "attentional set" an individual employs in a given situation. The instantiation of an attentional set is often viewed as a strategic, voluntary process, relying on working memory systems that represent immediate task priorities. However, influential theories of attention and automaticity propose that goal-directed control can operate more or less automatically on the basis of longer term task representations, a notion supported by a number of recent studies. Here, we provide evidence that longer term contextual learning can rapidly and automatically influence the instantiation of a given attentional set. Observers learned associations between specific attentional sets and specific task-irrelevant background scenes during a training session, and in the ensuing test session, simply reinstating particular scenes on a trial-by-trial basis biased observers to employ the associated attentional set. This directly influenced the magnitude of attentional capture, suggesting that memory for the context in which a task is performed can play an important role in the ability to instantiate a particular attentional set and overcome distraction by salient, task-irrelevant information. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23025581      PMCID: PMC3924559          DOI: 10.1037/a0030027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  69 in total

1.  Interacting roles of attention and visual salience in V4.

Authors:  John H Reynolds; Robert Desimone
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2003-03-06       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  A salient distractor does not disrupt conjunction search.

Authors:  D Lamy; Y Tsal
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-03

Review 3.  Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection.

Authors:  Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2010-05-26

4.  Effects of search mode and intertrial priming on singleton search.

Authors:  Dominique Lamy; Tomer Carmel; Howard E Egeth; Andrew B Leber
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2006-08

5.  The Neural Basis of Selective Attention: Cortical Sources and Targets of Attentional Modulation.

Authors:  Steven Yantis
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2008

6.  Time to Guide: Evidence for Delayed Attentional Guidance in Contextual Cueing.

Authors:  Melina A Kunar; Stephen J Flusberg; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2008

7.  Observing degradation of visual representations over short intervals when medial temporal lobe is damaged.

Authors:  David E Warren; Melissa C Duff; Daniel Tranel; Neal J Cohen
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Interactions of top-down and bottom-up mechanisms in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Stephanie McMains; Sabine Kastner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  A neural theory of visual attention: bridging cognition and neurophysiology.

Authors:  Claus Bundesen; Thomas Habekost; Soren Kyllingsbaek
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Perceptual deficits in amnesia: challenging the medial temporal lobe 'mnemonic' view.

Authors:  Andy C H Lee; Tim J Bussey; Elisabeth A Murray; Lisa M Saksida; Russell A Epstein; Narinder Kapur; John R Hodges; Kim S Graham
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  18 in total

1.  The Caudate Nucleus Mediates Learning of Stimulus-Control State Associations.

Authors:  Yu-Chin Chiu; Jiefeng Jiang; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Filtering visual onsets via habituation: A context-specific long-term memory of irrelevant stimuli.

Authors:  Massimo Turatto; Francesca Bonetti; David Pascucci
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-06

3.  Light social drinkers are more distracted by irrelevant information from an induced attentional bias than heavy social drinkers.

Authors:  Helen C Knight; Daniel T Smith; David C Knight; Amanda Ellison
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-08-18       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 4.  Inhibition as a potential resolution to the attentional capture debate.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2018-10-29

5.  Context isn't everything: Search performance is influenced by the nature of the task but not the background.

Authors:  Brett A Cochrane; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Learned states of preparatory attentional control.

Authors:  Anthony W Sali; Brian A Anderson; Steven Yantis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Selection history in context: Evidence for the role of reinforcement learning in biasing attention.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Mark K Britton
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Establishment of an attentional set via statistical learning.

Authors:  Joshua D Cosman; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Oculomotor Inhibition of Salient Distractors: Voluntary Inhibition Cannot Override Selection History.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; John M Gaspar; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2019-04-09

10.  Learned control over distraction is disrupted in amnesia.

Authors:  Joshua D Cosman; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-06-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.