Literature DB >> 33010740

Changes in visual cortical processing attenuate singleton distraction during visual search.

Bo-Yeong Won1, Martha Forloines2, Zhiheng Zhou3, Joy J Geng4.   

Abstract

The ability to suppress distractions is essential to successful completion of goal-directed behaviors. Several behavioral studies have recently provided strong evidence that learned suppression may be particularly efficient in reducing distractor interference. Expectations about a distractor's repeated location, color, or even presence are rapidly learned and used to attenuate interference. In this study, we use a visual search paradigm in which a color singleton, which is known to capture attention, occurs within blocks with high or low frequency. The behavioral results show reduced singleton interference during the high compared to the low frequency block (Won et al., 2019). The fMRI results provide evidence that the attenuation of distractor interference is supported by changes in singleton, target, and non-salient distractor representations within retinotopic visual cortex. These changes in visual cortex are accompanied by findings that singleton-present trials compared to non-singleton trials produce greater activation in bilateral parietal cortex, indicative of attentional capture, in low frequency, but not high frequency blocks. Together, these results suggest that the readout of saliency signals associated with an expected color singleton from visual cortex is suppressed, resulting in less competition for attentional priority in frontoparietal attentional control regions.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Functional magnetic resonance imaging; MVPA; Singleton distraction; Visual cortex; Visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33010740      PMCID: PMC7655700          DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.08.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  85 in total

1.  Preparatory activity in visual cortex indexes distractor suppression during covert spatial orienting.

Authors:  John T Serences; Steven Yantis; Andrew Culberson; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-07-14       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Cue validity modulates the neural correlates of covert endogenous orienting of attention in parietal and frontal cortex.

Authors:  Simone Vossel; Christiane M Thiel; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-07-17       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Top-down versus bottom-up control of attention in the prefrontal and posterior parietal cortices.

Authors:  Timothy J Buschman; Earl K Miller
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-03-30       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI.

Authors:  Nikos K Logothetis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Driven to less distraction: rTMS of the right parietal cortex reduces attentional capture in visual search.

Authors:  John Hodsoll; Carmel Mevorach; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Specific Visual Subregions of TPJ Mediate Reorienting of Spatial Attention.

Authors:  Laura Dugué; Elisha P Merriam; David J Heeger; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture.

Authors:  Benchi Wang; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Oculomotor Inhibition of Salient Distractors: Voluntary Inhibition Cannot Override Selection History.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; John M Gaspar; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2019-04-09

9.  Within-hemifield competition in early visual areas limits the ability to track multiple objects with attention.

Authors:  Viola S Störmer; George A Alvarez; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture independent of search strategy.

Authors:  Benchi Wang; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.199

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Priming of probabilistic attentional templates.

Authors:  Árni Kristjánsson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-07-13

2.  Learned distractor rejection persists across target search in a different dimension.

Authors:  Brad T Stilwell; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 2.157

3.  History Modulates Early Sensory Processing of Salient Distractors.

Authors:  Kirsten C S Adam; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 6.709

4.  Differing Time Courses of Reward-Related Attentional Processing: An EEG Source-Space Analysis.

Authors:  Denise E L Lockhofen; Nils Hübner; Fatma Hemdan; Gebhard Sammer; Dion Henare; Anna Schubö; Christoph Mulert
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 5.  Ten simple rules to study distractor suppression.

Authors:  Malte Wöstmann; Viola S Störmer; Jonas Obleser; Douglas A Addleman; Søren K Andersen; Nicholas Gaspelin; Joy J Geng; Steven J Luck; MaryAnn P Noonan; Heleen A Slagter; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 10.885

6.  Statistical learning of target selection and distractor suppression shape attentional priority according to different timeframes.

Authors:  Valeria Di Caro; Chiara Della Libera
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Memory precision for salient distractors decreases with learned suppression.

Authors:  Bo-Yeong Won; Aditi Venkatesh; Phillip P Witkowski; Timothy Banh; Joy J Geng
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-07-28
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.