Zijian Zhang1,2, Jinzhong Yang3, Angela Ho2,4, Wen Jiang5, Jennifer Logan5, Xin Wang2, Paul D Brown5, Susan L McGovern5, Nandita Guha-Thakurta6, Sherise D Ferguson7, Xenia Fave2, Lifei Zhang2, Dennis Mackin2, Laurence E Court2, Jing Li5. 1. Central South University Xiangya Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, China. 2. Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 1420, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. 3. Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 1420, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. jyang4@mdanderson.org. 4. University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 1420, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. 6. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 1420, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. 7. Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 1420, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To develop a model using radiomic features extracted from MR images to distinguish radiation necrosis from tumour progression in brain metastases after Gamma Knife radiosurgery. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 87 patients with pathologically confirmed necrosis (24 lesions) or progression (73 lesions) and calculated 285 radiomic features from four MR sequences (T1, T1 post-contrast, T2, and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery) obtained at two follow-up time points per lesion per patient. Reproducibility of each feature between the two time points was calculated within each group to identify a subset of features with distinct reproducible values between two groups. Changes in radiomic features from one time point to the next (delta radiomics) were used to build a model to classify necrosis and progression lesions. RESULTS: A combination of five radiomic features from both T1 post-contrast and T2 MR images were found to be useful in distinguishing necrosis from progression lesions. Delta radiomic features with a RUSBoost ensemble classifier had an overall predictive accuracy of 73.2% and an area under the curve value of 0.73 in leave-one-out cross-validation. CONCLUSIONS: Delta radiomic features extracted from MR images have potential for distinguishing radiation necrosis from tumour progression after radiosurgery for brain metastases. KEY POINTS: • Some radiomic features showed better reproducibility for progressive lesions than necrotic ones • Delta radiomic features can help to distinguish radiation necrosis from tumour progression • Delta radiomic features had better predictive value than did traditional radiomic features.
OBJECTIVES: To develop a model using radiomic features extracted from MR images to distinguish radiation necrosis from tumour progression in brain metastases after Gamma Knife radiosurgery. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 87 patients with pathologically confirmed necrosis (24 lesions) or progression (73 lesions) and calculated 285 radiomic features from four MR sequences (T1, T1 post-contrast, T2, and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery) obtained at two follow-up time points per lesion per patient. Reproducibility of each feature between the two time points was calculated within each group to identify a subset of features with distinct reproducible values between two groups. Changes in radiomic features from one time point to the next (delta radiomics) were used to build a model to classify necrosis and progression lesions. RESULTS: A combination of five radiomic features from both T1 post-contrast and T2 MR images were found to be useful in distinguishing necrosis from progression lesions. Delta radiomic features with a RUSBoost ensemble classifier had an overall predictive accuracy of 73.2% and an area under the curve value of 0.73 in leave-one-out cross-validation. CONCLUSIONS: Delta radiomic features extracted from MR images have potential for distinguishing radiation necrosis from tumour progression after radiosurgery for brain metastases. KEY POINTS: • Some radiomic features showed better reproducibility for progressive lesions than necrotic ones • Delta radiomic features can help to distinguish radiation necrosis from tumour progression • Delta radiomic features had better predictive value than did traditional radiomic features.
Authors: David Mattes; David R Haynor; Hubert Vesselle; Thomas K Lewellen; William Eubank Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Philipp Kickingereder; Sina Burth; Antje Wick; Michael Götz; Oliver Eidel; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Klaus H Maier-Hein; Wolfgang Wick; Martin Bendszus; Alexander Radbruch; David Bonekamp Journal: Radiology Date: 2016-06-20 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Douglas Kondziolka; Juan J Martin; John C Flickinger; David M Friedland; Adam M Brufsky; Joseph Baar; Sanjiv Agarwala; John M Kirkwood; L Dade Lunsford Journal: Cancer Date: 2005-12-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Duc Fehr; Harini Veeraraghavan; Andreas Wibmer; Tatsuo Gondo; Kazuhiro Matsumoto; Herbert Alberto Vargas; Evis Sala; Hedvig Hricak; Joseph O Deasy Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-11-02 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jinzhong Yang; Lifei Zhang; Xenia J Fave; David V Fried; Francesco C Stingo; Chaan S Ng; Laurence E Court Journal: Comput Med Imaging Graph Date: 2015-12-14 Impact factor: 4.790
Authors: Haruka Itakura; Achal S Achrol; Lex A Mitchell; Joshua J Loya; Tiffany Liu; Erick M Westbroek; Abdullah H Feroze; Scott Rodriguez; Sebastian Echegaray; Tej D Azad; Kristen W Yeom; Sandy Napel; Daniel L Rubin; Steven D Chang; Griffith R Harsh; Olivier Gevaert Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2015-09-02 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Ji Eun Park; Donghyun Kim; Ho Sung Kim; Seo Young Park; Jung Youn Kim; Se Jin Cho; Jae Ho Shin; Jeong Hoon Kim Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-07-26 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: M Ismail; V Hill; V Statsevych; R Huang; P Prasanna; R Correa; G Singh; K Bera; N Beig; R Thawani; A Madabhushi; M Aahluwalia; P Tiwari Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Robert H Press; Hui-Kuo G Shu; Hyunsuk Shim; James M Mountz; Brenda F Kurland; Richard L Wahl; Ella F Jones; Nola M Hylton; Elizabeth R Gerstner; Robert J Nordstrom; Lori Henderson; Karen A Kurdziel; Bhadrasain Vikram; Michael A Jacobs; Matthias Holdhoff; Edward Taylor; David A Jaffray; Lawrence H Schwartz; David A Mankoff; Paul E Kinahan; Hannah M Linden; Philippe Lambin; Thomas J Dilling; Daniel L Rubin; Lubomir Hadjiiski; John M Buatti Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2018-06-30 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Michele Avanzo; Lise Wei; Joseph Stancanello; Martin Vallières; Arvind Rao; Olivier Morin; Sarah A Mattonen; Issam El Naqa Journal: Med Phys Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 4.071