Literature DB >> 26578786

Automatic classification of prostate cancer Gleason scores from multiparametric magnetic resonance images.

Duc Fehr1, Harini Veeraraghavan2, Andreas Wibmer3, Tatsuo Gondo4, Kazuhiro Matsumoto4, Herbert Alberto Vargas3, Evis Sala3, Hedvig Hricak3, Joseph O Deasy1.   

Abstract

Noninvasive, radiological image-based detection and stratification of Gleason patterns can impact clinical outcomes, treatment selection, and the determination of disease status at diagnosis without subjecting patients to surgical biopsies. We present machine learning-based automatic classification of prostate cancer aggressiveness by combining apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and T2-weighted (T2-w) MRI-based texture features. Our approach achieved reasonably accurate classification of Gleason scores (GS) 6(3 + 3) vs. ≥7 and 7(3 + 4) vs. 7(4 + 3) despite the presence of highly unbalanced samples by using two different sample augmentation techniques followed by feature selection-based classification. Our method distinguished between GS 6(3 + 3) and ≥7 cancers with 93% accuracy for cancers occurring in both peripheral (PZ) and transition (TZ) zones and 92% for cancers occurring in the PZ alone. Our approach distinguished the GS 7(3 + 4) from GS 7(4 + 3) with 92% accuracy for cancers occurring in both the PZ and TZ and with 93% for cancers occurring in the PZ alone. In comparison, a classifier using only the ADC mean achieved a top accuracy of 58% for distinguishing GS 6(3 + 3) vs. GS ≥7 for cancers occurring in PZ and TZ and 63% for cancers occurring in PZ alone. The same classifier achieved an accuracy of 59% for distinguishing GS 7(3 + 4) from GS 7(4 + 3) occurring in the PZ and TZ and 60% for cancers occurring in PZ alone. Separate analysis of the cancers occurring in TZ alone was not performed owing to the limited number of samples. Our results suggest that texture features derived from ADC and T2-w MRI together with sample augmentation can help to obtain reasonably accurate classification of Gleason patterns.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gleason score classification; PCa Gleason (3+4) vs. (4+3) cancers; PCa Gleason 6 vs. ≥7; learning from unbalanced data; multiparametric MRI

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26578786      PMCID: PMC4655555          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1505935112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  36 in total

1.  Transatlantic Consensus Group on active surveillance and focal therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hashim U Ahmed; Oguz Akin; Jonathan A Coleman; Sarah Crane; Mark Emberton; Larry Goldenberg; Hedvig Hricak; Mike W Kattan; John Kurhanewicz; Caroline M Moore; Chris Parker; Thomas J Polascik; Peter Scardino; Nicholas van As; Arnauld Villers
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Engineering and algorithm design for an image processing Api: a technical report on ITK--the Insight Toolkit.

Authors:  Terry S Yoo; Michael J Ackerman; William E Lorensen; Will Schroeder; Vikram Chalana; Stephen Aylward; Dimitris Metaxas; Ross Whitaker
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2002

3.  Computer-aided diagnosis of prostate cancer in the peripheral zone using multiparametric MRI.

Authors:  Emilie Niaf; Olivier Rouvière; Florence Mège-Lechevallier; Flavie Bratan; Carole Lartizien
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Prostate MRI: evaluating tumor volume and apparent diffusion coefficient as surrogate biomarkers for predicting tumor Gleason score.

Authors:  Olivio F Donati; Asim Afaq; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Yousef Mazaheri; Junting Zheng; Chaya S Moskowitz; Hedvig Hricak; Oguz Akin
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Haralick texture analysis of prostate MRI: utility for differentiating non-cancerous prostate from prostate cancer and differentiating prostate cancers with different Gleason scores.

Authors:  Andreas Wibmer; Hedvig Hricak; Tatsuo Gondo; Kazuhiro Matsumoto; Harini Veeraraghavan; Duc Fehr; Junting Zheng; Debra Goldman; Chaya Moskowitz; Samson W Fine; Victor E Reuter; James Eastham; Evis Sala; Hebert Alberto Vargas
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Predicting 15-year prostate cancer specific mortality after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Scott E Eggener; Peter T Scardino; Patrick C Walsh; Misop Han; Alan W Partin; Bruce J Trock; Zhaoyong Feng; David P Wood; James A Eastham; Ofer Yossepowitch; Danny M Rabah; Michael W Kattan; Changhong Yu; Eric A Klein; Andrew J Stephenson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Multimodal wavelet embedding representation for data combination (MaWERiC): integrating magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy for prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  P Tiwari; S Viswanath; J Kurhanewicz; A Sridhar; A Madabhushi
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 4.044

8.  Central gland and peripheral zone prostate tumors have significantly different quantitative imaging signatures on 3 Tesla endorectal, in vivo T2-weighted MR imagery.

Authors:  Satish E Viswanath; Nicholas B Bloch; Jonathan C Chappelow; Robert Toth; Neil M Rofsky; Elizabeth M Genega; Robert E Lenkinski; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Prostate cancer specific mortality and Gleason 7 disease differences in prostate cancer outcomes between cases with Gleason 4 + 3 and Gleason 3 + 4 tumors in a population based cohort.

Authors:  Jonathan L Wright; Claudia A Salinas; Daniel W Lin; Suzanne Kolb; Joseph Koopmeiners; Ziding Feng; Janet L Stanford
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: a potential non-invasive marker of tumour aggressiveness in localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  N M deSouza; S F Riches; N J Vanas; V A Morgan; S A Ashley; C Fisher; G S Payne; C Parker
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 2.350

View more
  102 in total

1.  Prostate cancer: The applicability of textural analysis of MRI for grading.

Authors:  Frederick Kelcz; David F Jarrard
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Radiomic features from pretreatment biparametric MRI predict prostate cancer biochemical recurrence: Preliminary findings.

Authors:  Rakesh Shiradkar; Soumya Ghose; Ivan Jambor; Pekka Taimen; Otto Ettala; Andrei S Purysko; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  PROSTATEx Challenges for computerized classification of prostate lesions from multiparametric magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Samuel G Armato; Henkjan Huisman; Karen Drukker; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Justin S Kirby; Nicholas Petrick; George Redmond; Maryellen L Giger; Kenny Cha; Artem Mamonov; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Keyvan Farahani
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-11-10

4.  Classification of suspicious lesions on prostate multiparametric MRI using machine learning.

Authors:  Deukwoo Kwon; Isildinha M Reis; Adrian L Breto; Yohann Tschudi; Nicole Gautney; Olmo Zavala-Romero; Christopher Lopez; John C Ford; Sanoj Punnen; Alan Pollack; Radka Stoyanova
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-09-06

5.  Preoperative Prediction of Extracapsular Extension: Radiomics Signature Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Stage Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Shuai Ma; Huihui Xie; Huihui Wang; Jiejin Yang; Chao Han; Xiaoying Wang; Xiaodong Zhang
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Multisite evaluation of radiomic feature reproducibility and discriminability for identifying peripheral zone prostate tumors on MRI.

Authors:  Prathyush Chirra; Patrick Leo; Michael Yim; B Nicolas Bloch; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Andrei Purysko; Mark Rosen; Anant Madabhushi; Satish E Viswanath
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-06-14

Review 7.  [MRI of the prostate].

Authors:  D Nörenberg; O Solyanik; B Schlenker; G Magistro; B Ertl-Wagner; D A Clevert; C Stief; M F Reiser; M D'Anastasi
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Detection of prostate cancer in multiparametric MRI using random forest with instance weighting.

Authors:  Nathan Lay; Yohannes Tsehay; Matthew D Greer; Baris Turkbey; Jin Tae Kwak; Peter L Choyke; Peter Pinto; Bradford J Wood; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-06-12

Review 9.  Texture analysis of medical images for radiotherapy applications.

Authors:  Elisa Scalco; Giovanna Rizzo
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 10.  Novel imaging techniques of rectal cancer: what do radiomics and radiogenomics have to offer? A literature review.

Authors:  Natally Horvat; David D B Bates; Iva Petkovska
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2019-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.