Literature DB >> 30353872

Distinguishing True Progression From Radionecrosis After Stereotactic Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases With Machine Learning and Radiomics.

Luke Peng1, Vishwa Parekh2, Peng Huang3, Doris D Lin2, Khadija Sheikh1, Brock Baker1, Talia Kirschbaum1, Francesca Silvestri1, Jessica Son1, Adam Robinson1, Ellen Huang1, Heather Ames4, Jimm Grimm1, Linda Chen1, Colette Shen1, Michael Soike5, Emory McTyre5, Kristin Redmond1, Michael Lim6, Junghoon Lee1, Michael A Jacobs2, Lawrence Kleinberg7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Treatment effect or radiation necrosis after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases is a common phenomenon often indistinguishable from true progression. Radiomics is an emerging field that promises to improve on conventional imaging. In this study, we sought to apply a radiomics-based prediction model to the problem of diagnosing treatment effect after SRS. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We included patients in the Johns Hopkins Health System who were treated with SRS for brain metastases who subsequently underwent resection for symptomatic growth. We also included cases of likely treatment effect in which lesions grew but subsequently regressed spontaneously. Lesions were segmented semiautomatically on preoperative T1 postcontrast and T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging, and radiomic features were extracted with software developed in-house. Top-performing features on univariate logistic regression were entered into a hybrid feature selection/classification model, IsoSVM, with parameter optimization and further feature selection performed using leave-one-out cross-validation. Final model performance was assessed by 10-fold cross-validation with 100 repeats. All cases were independently reviewed by a board-certified neuroradiologist for comparison.
RESULTS: We identified 82 treated lesions across 66 patients, with 77 lesions having pathologic confirmation. There were 51 radiomic features extracted per segmented lesion on each magnetic resonance imaging sequence. An optimized IsoSVM classifier based on top-ranked radiomic features had sensitivity and specificity of 65.38% and 86.67%, respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.81 on leave-one-out cross-validation. Only 73% of cases were classifiable by the neuroradiologist, with a sensitivity of 97% and specificity of 19%.
CONCLUSIONS: Radiomics holds promise for differentiating between treatment effect and true progression in brain metastases treated with SRS. A predictive model built on radiomic features from an institutional cohort performed well on cross-validation testing. These results warrant further validation in independent datasets. Such work could prove invaluable for guiding management of individual patients and assessing outcomes of novel interventions.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30353872      PMCID: PMC6746307          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.05.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  30 in total

Review 1.  MR spectroscopy in radiation injury.

Authors:  P C Sundgren
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Can standard magnetic resonance imaging reliably distinguish recurrent tumor from radiation necrosis after radiosurgery for brain metastases? A radiographic-pathological study.

Authors:  Ivan M Dequesada; Ronald G Quisling; Anthony Yachnis; William A Friedman
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  A meta-analysis evaluating stereotactic radiosurgery, whole-brain radiotherapy, or both for patients presenting with a limited number of brain metastases.

Authors:  May Tsao; Wei Xu; Arjun Sahgal
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  T1/T2 matching to differentiate tumor growth from radiation effects after stereotactic radiosurgery.

Authors:  Hideyuki Kano; Douglas Kondziolka; Javier Lobato-Polo; Oscar Zorro; John C Flickinger; L Dade Lunsford
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 5.  A comprehensive review of MR imaging changes following radiosurgery to 500 brain metastases.

Authors:  T R Patel; B J McHugh; W L Bi; F J Minja; J P S Knisely; V L Chiang
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Role of O-(2-(18)F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET for differentiation of local recurrent brain metastasis from radiation necrosis.

Authors:  Norbert Galldiks; Gabriele Stoffels; Christian P Filss; Marc D Piroth; Michael Sabel; Maximilian I Ruge; Hans Herzog; Nadim J Shah; Gereon R Fink; Heinz H Coenen; Karl-Josef Langen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Conventional MRI does not reliably distinguish radiation necrosis from tumor recurrence after stereotactic radiosurgery.

Authors:  Abigail L Stockham; Andrew L Tievsky; Shlomo A Koyfman; Chandana A Reddy; John H Suh; Michael A Vogelbaum; Gene H Barnett; Samuel T Chao
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 8.  Clinical features, mechanisms, and management of pseudoprogression in malignant gliomas.

Authors:  Dieta Brandsma; Lukas Stalpers; Walter Taal; Peter Sminia; Martin J van den Bent
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 41.316

9.  Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for the prediction of treatment response.

Authors:  Ann D King; Kwok-Keung Chow; Kwok-Hung Yu; Frankie Kwok Fai Mo; David K W Yeung; Jing Yuan; Kunwar S Bhatia; Alexander C Vlantis; Anil T Ahuja
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Coregistered FDG PET/CT-based textural characterization of head and neck cancer for radiation treatment planning.

Authors:  Huan Yu; Curtis Caldwell; Katherine Mah; Daniel Mozeg
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 10.048

View more
  40 in total

1.  Development and validation of an MRI-based radiomic nomogram to distinguish between good and poor responders in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Jia Wang; Xuejun Liu; Bin Hu; Yuanxiang Gao; Jingjing Chen; Jie Li
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-11-05

2.  Consensus recommendations for a standardized brain tumor imaging protocol for clinical trials in brain metastases.

Authors:  Timothy J Kaufmann; Marion Smits; Jerrold Boxerman; Raymond Huang; Daniel P Barboriak; Michael Weller; Caroline Chung; Christina Tsien; Paul D Brown; Lalitha Shankar; Evanthia Galanis; Elizabeth Gerstner; Martin J van den Bent; Terry C Burns; Ian F Parney; Gavin Dunn; Priscilla K Brastianos; Nancy U Lin; Patrick Y Wen; Benjamin M Ellingson
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 12.300

3.  Editorial commentary to "18F-Fluorocholine PET uptake correlates with pathologic evidence of recurrent tumor after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases" by Grkovski and colleagues.

Authors:  Pierre Lovinfosse; Selma Ben Mustapha; Nadia Withofs
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  Precision Digital Oncology: Emerging Role of Radiomics-based Biomarkers and Artificial Intelligence for Advanced Imaging and Characterization of Brain Tumors.

Authors:  Reza Forghani
Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer       Date:  2020-07-31

5.  Imaging challenges of immunotherapy and targeted therapy in patients with brain metastases: response, progression, and pseudoprogression.

Authors:  Norbert Galldiks; Martin Kocher; Garry Ceccon; Jan-Michael Werner; Anna Brunn; Martina Deckert; Whitney B Pope; Riccardo Soffietti; Emilie Le Rhun; Michael Weller; Jörg C Tonn; Gereon R Fink; Karl-Josef Langen
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 6.  Machine Learning-Based Radiomics in Neuro-Oncology.

Authors:  Felix Ehret; David Kaul; Hans Clusmann; Daniel Delev; Julius M Kernbach
Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl       Date:  2022

Review 7.  Radiomic Features Associated with Extent of Resection in Glioma Surgery.

Authors:  Giovanni Muscas; Simone Orlandini; Eleonora Becattini; Francesca Battista; Victor E Staartjes; Carlo Serra; Alessandro Della Puppa
Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl       Date:  2022

Review 8.  Current approaches to the management of brain metastases.

Authors:  John H Suh; Rupesh Kotecha; Samuel T Chao; Manmeet S Ahluwalia; Arjun Sahgal; Eric L Chang
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 66.675

9.  A Liquid Biopsy to Assess Brain Tumor Recurrence: Presence of Circulating Mo-MDSC and CD14+ VNN2+ Myeloid Cells as Biomarkers That Distinguish Brain Metastasis From Radiation Necrosis Following Stereotactic Radiosurgery.

Authors:  David C Soler; Amber Kerstetter-Fogle; Theresa Elder; Alankrita Raghavan; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; Kevin D Cooper; Thomas S McCormick; Andrew E Sloan
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 10.  Transformational Role of Medical Imaging in (Radiation) Oncology.

Authors:  Catherine Coolens; Matt N Gwilliam; Paula Alcaide-Leon; Isabella Maria de Freitas Faria; Fabio Ynoe de Moraes
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-23       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.