Fei Dong1, Qian Li2, Duo Xu1, Wenji Xiu3, Qiang Zeng4, Xiuliang Zhu1, Fangfang Xu1, Biao Jiang1, Minming Zhang5. 1. Department of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310009, China. 2. Department of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310009, China. liqianivy@zju.edu.cn. 3. Department of Radiology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, China. 4. Department of Neurosurgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310009, China. 5. Department of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310009, China. zhangminming@zju.edu.cn.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To differentiate brain pilocytic astrocytoma (PA) from glioblastoma (GBM) using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) quantitative radiomic features by a decision tree model. METHODS: Sixty-six patients from two centres (PA, n = 31; GBM, n = 35) were randomly divided into training and validation data sets (about 2:1). Quantitative radiomic features of the tumours were extracted from contrast-enhanced MR images. A subset of features was selected by feature stability and Boruta algorithm. The selected features were used to build a decision tree model. Predictive accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were used to assess model performance. The classification outcome of the model was combined with tumour location, age and gender features, and multivariable logistic regression analysis and permutation test using the entire data set were performed to further evaluate the decision tree model. RESULTS: A total of 271 radiomic features were successfully extracted for each tumour. Twelve features were selected as input variables to build the decision tree model. Two features S(1, -1) Entropy and S(2, -2) SumAverg were finally included in the model. The model showed an accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of 0.87, 0.90 and 0.83 for the training data set and 0.86, 0.80 and 0.91 for the validation data set. The classification outcome of the model related to the actual tumour types and did not rely on the other three features (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A decision tree model with two features derived from the contrast-enhanced MR images performed well in differentiating PA from GBM. KEY POINTS: • MRI findings of PA and GBM are sometimes very similar. • Radiomics provides much more quantitative information about tumours. • Radiomic features can help to distinguish PA from GBM.
OBJECTIVE: To differentiate brain pilocytic astrocytoma (PA) from glioblastoma (GBM) using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) quantitative radiomic features by a decision tree model. METHODS: Sixty-six patients from two centres (PA, n = 31; GBM, n = 35) were randomly divided into training and validation data sets (about 2:1). Quantitative radiomic features of the tumours were extracted from contrast-enhanced MR images. A subset of features was selected by feature stability and Boruta algorithm. The selected features were used to build a decision tree model. Predictive accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were used to assess model performance. The classification outcome of the model was combined with tumour location, age and gender features, and multivariable logistic regression analysis and permutation test using the entire data set were performed to further evaluate the decision tree model. RESULTS: A total of 271 radiomic features were successfully extracted for each tumour. Twelve features were selected as input variables to build the decision tree model. Two features S(1, -1) Entropy and S(2, -2) SumAverg were finally included in the model. The model showed an accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of 0.87, 0.90 and 0.83 for the training data set and 0.86, 0.80 and 0.91 for the validation data set. The classification outcome of the model related to the actual tumour types and did not rely on the other three features (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A decision tree model with two features derived from the contrast-enhanced MR images performed well in differentiating PA from GBM. KEY POINTS: • MRI findings of PA and GBM are sometimes very similar. • Radiomics provides much more quantitative information about tumours. • Radiomic features can help to distinguish PA from GBM.
Authors: Piotr M Szczypiński; Michał Strzelecki; Andrzej Materka; Artur Klepaczko Journal: Comput Methods Programs Biomed Date: 2008-10-14 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: James G Smirniotopoulos; Frances M Murphy; Elizabeth J Rushing; John H Rees; Jason W Schroeder Journal: Radiographics Date: 2007 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: Richard D Murray; Paul L Penar; Christopher G Filippi; Izabela Tarasiewicz Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2011 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: Matthew D Cykowski; Richard A Allen; Angela C Kanaly; Kar-Ming Fung; Roxanne Marshall; Arie Perry; Ethan D Stolzenberg; S Terence Dunn Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2013-09-21 Impact factor: 4.506
Authors: Ji Eun Park; Donghyun Kim; Ho Sung Kim; Seo Young Park; Jung Youn Kim; Se Jin Cho; Jae Ho Shin; Jeong Hoon Kim Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-07-26 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Ji Eun Park; Ho Sung Kim; Donghyun Kim; Seo Young Park; Jung Youn Kim; Se Jin Cho; Jeong Hoon Kim Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2020-01-10 Impact factor: 4.430